Base-Off B12 Coenzymes and Analogues
J. Phys. Chem. B, Vol. 114, No. 38, 2010 12403
The estimated quantum yield for bond homolysis is 0.12 (
0.06 following excitation of AdoCbl and 0.2 ( 0.1 following
excitation of PrCbl. In contrast, the estimated quantum yield
for bond homolysis in MeCbl is substantially larger at 0.65
(+0.15, -0.25). The error bars reflect uncertainties in the
measurements, including the uncertainty in the percentage of
molecules excited within the sample volume and uncertainty
in the extinction coefficients of the base-off spectra. These
quantum yields reflect the primary yield of the radical pair based
on the observed difference spectra between 400 and 600 ps.
The time scales for diffusive separation of the adenosyl and
propyl radicals from the cob(II)alamin in water at 20 °C, pH 7,
are 1.6 and 1.5 ns, respectively.37 Thus, the steady state quantum
yield may be influenced by geminate recombination of the
radical pair on a time scale longer then the measurements
reported here. There is no evidence for geminate recombination
in the data, but the signals are small enough that a small
amplitude nanosecond recombination cannot be ruled out.
The methyl radical diffuses significantly faster than the larger
adenosyl and n-propyl radicals. An effective lifetime of
130-400 ps is expected for the contact radical pair based on
measurements of recombination in the base-on compound and
on simple hydrodynamic calculations.37 In the data reported here
for base-off MeCbl, the transient absorption signal between 200
and 600 ps is constant. Geminate recombination does not occur
with any appreciable yield.
These quantum yields can be compared with the quantum
yields reported by Taylor et al. for steady state aerobic photolysis
of the base-off cobalamins at pH 1.27 Photolysis of base-off
AdoCbl (pH 1) resulted in a homolysis yield of ca. 0.02-0.04
across the spectrum from 250 to 470 nm. This is somewhat
lower than the estimate of 0.12 in the current study. Geminate
recombination of the radical pair may account for the discrep-
ancy. The photolysis yield following excitation of base-off PrCbl
at pH 1 was 0.26 ( 0.02 from 250 to 500 nm, in reasonable
agreement with the present measurement at 405 nm. The yield
for aerobic homolysis of MeCbl at pH 1 is 0.27 ( 0.02 from
470 to 350 nm, somewhat higher at shorter wavelengths and
lower at longer wavelengths. It appears that the primary yield
at 600 ps is substantially larger than the steady state quantum
yield. Geminate recombination will not account for the
discrepancy.
to π f π* transitions with vibrational progressions accounting
for the shoulders and subpeaks. More recently computational
and spectroscopic studies have called this into question, assign-
ing the major features to a complicated manifold of electronic
states.11-21,38 Accurate electronic structure calculations will be
able to account for the similarities and differences in the ground
and excited state spectra. Thus, these observations provide a
constraint for evaluating the calculations.
A. Electronic Structure and Excited State Spectra. Recent
TDDFT quantum chemical calculations by Kozlowski and
co-workers18,19 and Brunold and co-workers5,12 have explored
the electronic structure of base-off adenosyl and methyl cobi-
namides (AdoCbi and MeCbi). Most of these calculations have
examined the vertical transitions at the ground state equilibrium
geometry. In contrast, the transient absorption experiments probe
the excited state spectra as a function of conformational
relaxation and at the excited state minimum energy configura-
tion. Nonetheless, it is useful to consider the experimental results
in the context of these calculations. Koszlowski and co-workers
used B3LYP and BP86 functionals in TDDFT calculations of
the electronic transition of MeCbl, MeCbi, AdoCbl, and
AdoCbi.18,19 Calculations of AdoCbl and AdoCbi were also
performed using both functionals and a polarizable continuum
model to account for the influence of water solvation.18
In all of the calculations of base-on and base-off cobalamins,
the oscillator strength is carried by transitions involving π f
π* transitions of the corrin ring. The calculations using the
B3LYP functional do a better job of handling the π f π*
transitions than the calculations using the BP86 functional. As
a result, the B3LYP functional provides a prediction of the
absorption spectra. However, the BP86 functional is expected
to do a better job of modeling the d/π f π*/d transitions
sensitive to the axial ligation of the cobalt.18,19 Thus, it is useful
to consider the results of both methods. All of the calculations
for the cobinamides predict one or more states below the π f
π* states responsible for the absorption spectrum.
The B3LYP calculations of MeCbi predict that the lowest
singlet state, S1, contains contributions from the dyz + π, dxz +
π, and π + dyz f σ*(Co-C) configurations. The S2 state contains
contributions from the dxz + π f σ*, π + dy f dxy + π*, and
π + dz2 f π* configurations. Both of these states are lower in
energy than the dominant π f π* states carrying the oscillator
strength. The calculation using the BP86 functional predicts only
one state, with dominant dxy + π f π* character, below the
allowed π f π* states (Tables S4 and S5 of ref 19). Calculations
of AdoCbi show similar trends, with an Ado(π) f π*
configuration added to the mix (Tables S4 and S5 of ref 18). In
fact, the lowest state is dominated by the Ado(π) f π*
configuration in the calculation using the BP86 functional. When
the water solvent is approximated using the PCM model, the
Ado(π) f π* transitions move to higher energy, although
Ado(π*) mixes with σ*(Co-C) and contributes to the lowest
transitions in the calculation using the B3LYP functional (Tables
S11 and S12 of ref 18).
Discussion
The data presented above provide important new insights into
the electronic structure and reactivity of alkylcobalamins. The
mechanism for bond homolysis is modified by the presence or
absence of the nitrogenous axial ligand. The difference in
photochemistry reflects the influence of the axial ligand on the
electronic structure of the cobalamin and provides additional
insight into the role ligation and environment play in the
reactivity of the C-Co bond. Accurate electronic structure
calculations will be required to fully interpret the observed
photochemistry and photophysics of the cobalamin cofactors.
It is also noteworthy that the spectra of the lowest-lying
excited states populated following excitation of these three base-
off alkylcobalamins are remarkably similar to the spectra of
the parent ground state molecules. There is a very weak red
absorption tail observed for all three molecules, but the major
absorption features begin around 465 nm for both PrCbl and
AdoCbl (Figure 6). MeCbl appears to have a smaller band
around ca. 530 nm followed by a stronger transition at 465 nm
(Figure 7). Early models for the electronic structure of cobal-
amins assigned the major transitions in the absorption spectrum
It is dangerous to draw too many conclusions from these
calculations. They were performed at the ground state geometry
without allowing the excited state geometry to relax. In addition,
the methods are not yet well calibrated for the dark states
strongly influenced by the Co d atomic orbitals. Nonetheless, it
is suggestive that the lowest states are dominated by d orbital
excitations. It is also interesting that the σ*(Co-C) orbital plays
a significant role in the lowest transitions, at least in the B3LYP
calculations. It appears likely that the excited state spectra of
all three base-off compounds resemble the ground state spectra