With the above optimized conditions, the generality of our
process was examined with a selected series of aldehydes
with 2 (conditions A: i-Pr2NEt, -78 °C, 30 min, 0 °C, 40
min) and 7 (conditions C: Et3N, -78 °C, 2 h) and compared
with 3 (conditions B: Et3N, -78 °C, 2 h) (Table 2). The
the TBS ether and oxidized with DMP to the aldehyde (4i).
Ester 1d was converted to the Z-enolate with 7 and treated
with 4i to obtain the aldol 5id in 88% yield and g99%
selectivity. This hydroxy ester was protected as the TBS ether
and reduced with BH3·SMe2 to the corresponding alcohol 9.
This constitutes the synthesis of the racemic C5-C9
framework of our target (Scheme 3).
Table 2. Examination of Aldehydes for the Aldol Reaction
Scheme 3
.
Preparation of Racemic C5-C9 Framework of
6-CF3-dictyostatin
R′CHO
R′
aldol
no.
4
enol. conditionsa 5b yield,%c syn/antid
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
4a p-FC6H4
4a p-FC6H4
4a p-FC6H4
4b Ph
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
5aa
5ad
5ad
5ba
5bd
5bd
5ca
5cd
5cd
5da
5dd
5dd
5ea
5ed
5ed
5fa
69
76
74
64
79
87
67
90
76
70
81
95
50
72
75
48
65
52
63
65
73
61
40
70
86:14
5:95
e1:g99
86:14
6:94
e1:g99
86:14
9:91
e1:g99
86:14
4:96
e1:g99
90:10
12:88
e1:g99
57:43
8:92
e1:g99
75:25
8:92
4b Ph
4b Ph
4c p-NO2 C6H4
4c p-NO2 C6H4
4c p-NO2 C6H4
10 4d p-MeO C6H4
11 4d p-MeO C6H4
12 4d p-MeO C6H4
13 4e E-PhCHdCH
14 4e E-PhCHdCH
15 4e E-PhCHdCH
16 4f n-Pr
In conclusion, our investigations concentrated on the
boron-mediated enolization of 3,3,3-trifluoromethylpropi-
onates, and we have described the first successful enolbora-
tion-aldolization of these fluoroesters. Contrary to the
17 4f n-Pr
5fd
18 4f n-Pr
5fd
19 4g i-Pr
5ga
5gd
5gd
5ha
5hd
5hd
20 4g i-Pr
21 4g i-Pr
e1:g99
54:46
9:91
22 4h t-Bu
23 4h t-Bu
(20) Typical Procedure for the Anti-Selective Aldol Reaction. Bis-
exo-2-norbornylborane (Nrb2BH) (2.5 mmol), prepared from norbornene
and BH3·SMe2, was transferred to an oven-dried 50 mL round-bottom
flask in a glove bag. Methylene chloride (5 mL) was added, and the
mixture was cooled to 0 °C, followed by the addition of trifluo-
romethanesulfonic acid (2.8 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at
ambient temperature for 1 h and cooled to -78 °C, and triethylamine
(3.6 mmol) was added dropwise via syringe, followed by the addition
of tert-butyl 3,3,3-trifluoropropionate (1 mmol). The resulting solution
was stirred at this temperature for 2 h. The aldehyde (1.5 mmol) in
methylene chloride (1 mL) was then added, dropwise, to the above
enolate solution and stirred for an additional 1 h, followed by stirring
at 0 °C for 1 h. The reaction was quenched by the addition of pH 7
buffer solution (2 mL). The mixture was diluted with MeOH (2 mL),
followed by the careful addition of 30% hydrogen peroxide (2 mL),
and stirred vigorously for 6-8 h. The reaction mixture was partitioned
between water (4 mL) and methylene chloride (20 mL), the aqueous
layer was extracted with methylene chloride, and the combined organics
were washed with brine (5 mL), dried (anhydrous Na2SO4), filtered,
concentrated, and purified by silica gel chromatography to obtain the
pure anti-aldol product. Typical Procedure for the Syn-Selective Aldol
Reaction. 3,3,3-Trifluoropropionates (1 mmol) and methylene chloride
(4 mL) were transferred to an oven-dried 50-mL round-bottom flask
under nitrogen. This solution was cooled to -78 °C, and a solution of
n-butylboron triflate in dichloromethane (2 mmol) was added, followed
by the dropwise addition of diisopropylethylamine (3 mmol). The
resulting solution was stirred at this temperature for 30 min and 0 °C at
40 min. The aldehyde (0.75 mmol) in methylene chloride (1 mL) was
added dropwise to the enolate solution. The reaction mixture was stirred
for 1 h at -78 °C and 1 h at 0 °C and quenched by addition of pH 7
buffer solution (2 mL). The mixture was diluted with MeOH (2 mL),
followed by the careful addition of 30% hydrogen peroxide (2 mL),
and stirred vigorously for 6-8 h. The reaction mixture was partitioned
between water (4 mL) and methylene chloride (20 mL). The aqueous
layer was extracted with methylene chloride, and the combined organics
were washed with brine (5 mL), dried (anhydrous Na2SO4), filtered,
concentrated, and purified by silica gel chromatography to obtain the
pure syn-aldol product.
24 4h t-Bu
e1:g99
a A: R ) Me, 2, i-Pr2NEt, -78 °C, 30 min, 0 °C, 40 min. B: R ) t-Bu,
3, Et3N, -78 °C, 2 h. C: R ) t-Bu, 7, Et3N, -78 °C, 2 h. b The first letter
refers to the aldehyde, and the second letter refers to the ester. c Combined
yield of syn and anti isomers. d Syn and anti ratios were determined by 19
F
NMR spectroscopy.16
diastereomeric excess (de) for syn-aldols with reagent 2 is
in the 72-80% range for aromatic aldehydes and lower for
aliphatic aldehydes. Reagent 3 provided anti-aldols in
76-92% de. The bulky reagent 7 provided anti-aldols
exclusively (g99%) for all classes of aldehydes examined,
thus confirming its control.
Pursuing our goal, we examined reagent 7 for the
preparation of the CF3-containing racemic substructure of
C6-CF3 dictyostatin. 1,3-Propanediol was monoprotected as
(16) (a) The diastereomer ratio (dr) was determined by 19F NMR
spectroscopy. (b) For the assignment of the syn and anti configuration, see:
Sakamoto, T.; Takahashi, K.; Yamazaki, T.; Kitazume, T. J. Org. Chem.
1999, 64, 9467.
(17) Note that the E-enolate for the esters is similar to the Z-enolate for
ketones.
(18) In comparison, the TiCl4-catalyzed aldol reaction of silicon enolates
(ref 12) and TMEDA-assisted aldol reaction of titanium enolates (ref 13)
of trifluoropropanamides provide syn-products selectively.
(19) Brown and co-workers have shown that decreased bulk on boron
favors syn-aldol and increased bulk favors anti-aldols for ketone
enolization-aldolization. Brown, H. C.; Ganesan, K.; Dhar, R. K. J. Org.
Chem. 1992, 57, 3767.
4476
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 20, 2010