A.O. Ribeiro et al. / Journal of Alloys and Compounds 374 (2004) 151–153
153
Table 1
4. Conclusions
Experimental intensity parameters Ω2 and Ω4 for Eu(ppa)3·2H2O and
Eu(ppa)3·phen complexes
The present study reports a new complex of Eu3+ with
a -diketone with a phenyl group attached to the center of
the coordination ring, which represents an efficient antenna
molecule for the transfer of the absorbed energy to rare earth
ion. The ternary complex Eu(ppa)3·phen synthesized present
a strong luminescence, with the characteristic very sharp
Compound
Ω2 (10−20 cm2)
Ω4 (10−20 cm2)
Eu(ppa)3·2H2O
Eu(ppa)3·phen
23.7
24.6
8.9
11.4
5
7
bands of the transitions D0 → FJ (J = 0–4) of Eu3+
0–4) level of Eu3+ at 578, 591, 610, 651, and 702 nm are ob-
served for both complexes. The number of Stark levels [12]
5
7
(bandwidths of D0 → F2 at 610.6 nm = 15 cm−1 and
7
5D0 → F0 at 578.8 nm = 12 cm−1), becoming a promising
5
7
corresponding to D0 → F0,1,2 set of transitions observed
in the spectra are 1, 3, and 4 for hydrated complex and 1, 3,
and 5 for phen ternary complex, respectively. The different
number of Stark levels for Eu(ppa)3·phen is a result of the
change in the coordination site symmetry and an increase
in the rigidity of the complex, attributed by the presence
of the 1,10-phenanthroline molecule. A single symmetrical
candidate as luminescent material for photoluminescence
applications.
Acknowledgements
peak is observed for the 5D0 → F0 transition in both com-
7
CAPES, CNPq, FAPESP are gratefully acknowledged.
plexes, assuring that only one Eu3+ species is present in the
samples.
References
The decay time curves associated with the excited state
5D0 to the ground state F2 of Eu3+ in the complexes con-
7
[1] H.R. Li, H.J. Zhang, J. Lin, S.B. Wang, K.Y. Yang, J. Non-Cryst.
Solids 278 (2000) 219.
[2] O.A. Serra, I.L.V. Rosa, E.J. Nassar, P.C. Cardoso, P.S. Calefi, J.
Alloys Compd. 249 (1997) 178.
[3] A.A.S. Araújo, H.F. Brito, O.L. Malta, J.R. Matos, E.E.S. Teotonio,
S. Storpirtis, C.M.S. Izumi, J. Inorg. Biochem. 88 (1) (2001) 87.
[4] J.C.G. Bunzli, E. Moret, V. Foiret, K.J. Schenk, W. Mingzhao, J.
Linpei, J. Alloys Compd. 207 (1994) 107.
[5] H.F. Brito, O.L. Malta, J.F.S. Menezes, J. Alloys Compd. 303 (2000)
336.
[6] B. Yan, H. Zhang, S. wang, J. Ni, J. Photochem. Photobio. A 112
(1998) 231.
[7] G.F. Sá, O.L. Malta, C.M. Donegá, A.M. Simas, R.L. Longo, E.F.
Santa-Cruz Silva Jr., Coord. Chem. Rev. 196 (2000) 165.
[8] O.L. Malta, H.F. Brito, J.F.S. Menezes, F.R. Gonçalves, C.M. Donegá,
Alves Jr., Chem. Phys. Lett. 282 (1998) 233.
[9] S.T. Frey, M.L. Gong, W.D. Horrocks, Inorg. Chem. 33 (1994) 3329.
[10] O.A. Serra, E.J. Nassar, P.S. Calefi, I.L.V. Rosa, J. Alloys Compd.
275 (1998) 838.
[11] K. Nakamoto, Infrared e Raman Spectra of Inorganic and Coordi-
nation Compounds, fourth ed., Wiley, New York, 1986, p. 254.
[12] O.A. Serra, L.C. Thompson, Inorg. Chem. 15 (1976) 504.
[13] H.F. Brito, O.L. Malta, L.R. Souza, R. Ferraz, C.A.A. Carvalho,
J.F.S. Menezes, J. Alloys Compd. 275 (1998) 254.
sist in mono exponential decays with lifetimes values of
0.38 ms for Eu(ppa)3·2H2O and 0.51 ms for Eu(ppa)3·phen
( 0.01 ms). The mono exponential decay curves, in agree-
5
7
ment with the single peak observed for D0 → F0 transi-
tion, also indicate that Eu3+ occupies only one site in both
complexes.
Based on luminescence spectra of the Eu3+ compounds,
Ω experimental intensity parameters (λ = 2 and 4) were
calculated (Table 1) [13]. The Ω2 and Ω4 values for
Eu(ppa)3·phen are higher than the ones for Eu(ppa)3·2H2O
complex. Therefore, the substitution of water molecules
for phen increases the polarizability of Eu3+ chemical en-
vironment, also increasing the hypersensitive behavior of
the 0 → 2 transition. Moreover, the area values related to
each set of transitions for the different complexes shows
that Eu(ppa)3·phen emission is more intense than that of
Eu(ppa)3·2H2O. The phen ligand displaces the two wa-
ter molecules of the Eu3+ coordination sphere, which are
strong luminescence quenchers, explaining the increasing
of luminescence.