C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Figure 3. Proposed transition states for the nucleophilic attack of
vinylketene silyl N,O-acetal 10.
a synthetic point of view, our method using 10 can directly afford
the δ-hydroxy-R,γ-dimethyl-R,â-unsaturated carbonyl unit that is
seen in many polyketide natural products.16 Further optimization
and application of the methodology to the synthesis of biologically
interesting natural products are currently under investigation.
Figure 2. Proposed transition states for the nucleophilic attack of
vinylketene silyl N,O-acetal 4 and 7.
Scheme 3. Remote 1,6,7-Asymmetric Induction by Vinylogous
Mukaiyama Aldol Reaction Using 10a
Acknowledgment. This work was supported in part by the
Takeda Science Foundation, Sankyo Co. Ltd., and Grant-in-Aids
for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture,
Sports, and, Science and Technology, Japan.
Supporting Information Available: Detailed experimental pro-
cedures, full characterization, and copies of all new compounds. This
a Reagents: (i) NaHMDS, TBSCl, THF, -78 °C (90%). (ii) Hexanal,
b
1
TiCl4, CH2Cl2, -78 °C (87%). Determined by H NMR spectroscopy.
Table 2. Vinylogous Mukaiyama Aldol Reaction with Vinylketene
Silyl N,O-Acetal 10
References
(1) (a) ComprehensiVe Organic Synthesis; Trost, B. M., Fleming, I., Eds.;
Pergamon Press: Oxford, 1991. (b) Oare, D. A.; Heathcock, C. H. Top.
Stereochem. 1991, 20, 87. (c) Hoveyda, A. H.; Evans, D. A.; Fu, G. C.
Chem. ReV. 1993, 93, 1307.
(2) For reviews of the remote acyclic stereocontrol, see: (a) Mitchell, H. J.;
Nelson, A.; Warren, S. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1999, 1899. (b)
Mikami, K.; Shimizu, M.; Zhang, H.-C.; Maryanoff, B. E. Tetrahedron
2001, 57, 2917.
temp
C)
yield
(%)
entry
R
(
°
product
d.s.c
(3) (a) O’Malley, S. J.; Leighton, J. L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40,
2915. (b) Takemoto, Y.; Ishii, K.; Ibuka, T.; Miwa, Y.; Tada, T.; Nakao,
S.; Tanaka, T.; Ohishi, H.; Kai, Y.; Kanehisa, N. J. Org. Chem. 2001,
35, 6116. (c) Denmark, S. E.; Fujimori, S. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 3477. (d)
Dias, L. C.; Bau´, R. Z.; de Sousa, M. A.; Zukerman-Schepector, J. Org.
Lett. 2002, 4, 4325.
(4) (a) Mikami, K.; Shimizu, M. J. Synth. Org. Chem. Jpn. 1993, 51, 3. (b)
Thomas, E. J. Chemtracts: Org. Chem. 1994, 7, 207. (c) Sailes, H.;
Whiting, A. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2000, 1785. (d) Evans, D. A.;
Hu, E.; Burch, J. D.; Jaeschke, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 5654.
(5) For a review of the vinylogous aldol reaction, see: Casiraghi, G.; Zanardi,
F.; Appendino, G.; Rassu, G. Chem. ReV. 2000, 100, 1929.
(6) (a) Evans, D. A.; Kozlowski, M. C.; Murray, J. A.; Burgey, C. S.; Connell,
B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 669. (b) Bluet, G.; Campagne, J. M. J.
Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 4293. (c) Hassfeld, J.; Kalesse, M. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2002, 43, 5093.
1
2
3
4
CH3(CH2)4
(CH3)2CH
-78
-78
11a 87
11b 99
>50:1
>50:1
(E)-CH3CH2CHdC(CH3) -78 to -40 11c 67 (81b) >50:1
Ph
-78 to -55 11d 90
20:1
a 1.0 equiv of TiCl4, 2.0 equiv of aldehyde, 1.0 equiv of 10, 0.1 M in
CH2Cl2. b Conversion yield. c Determined by 400 MHz 1H NMR spectros-
copy.
ior, as well as the difference in the degree of stereoselectivity in
the cases of 4 and 7, can be rationalized by the Newman projection
models shown in Figure 2 (B for 4 and C for 7). In the case of 7,
approach of hexanal from the upper face is not effectively blocked
by chiral oxazolidin-2-one because the alkyl group of the aldehyde
is located at the opposite site of chiral auxiliary XN. Consequently,
the diastereoselectivity of 7 was lower than that for 4.
(7) (a) Hosokawa, S.; Sekiguchi, K.; Enemoto, M.; Kobayashi, S. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2000, 41, 6429. (b) Hosokawa, S.; Sekiguchi, K.; Hayase, K.;
Hirukawa, Y.; Kobayashi, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 6435. (c)
Hosokawa, S.; Kobayashi, S. J. Synth. Org. Chem. Jpn. 2001, 59, 1103.
(8) Abe, T.; Suzuki, T.; Sekiguchi, K.; Hosokawa, S.; Kobayashi, S.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 9303.
We examined the enol silylation of chiral imide 9, derived from
2-methyl-2-pentenoic acid, with NaHMDS and TBSCl. The vi-
nylketene silyl N,O-acetal 10 was isolated in 90% yield as a single
isomer. The E,E-stereochemistry of 10 was established by NOE
experiments. The TiCl4-mediated vinylogous Mukaiyama aldol
reaction of 10 with hexanal gave the aldol adduct 11a (RdC5H11)
in 87% yield as an almost single isomer. The relative as well as
absolute stereochemistry of 11a was established by correlation to
the known compound.14 Results with other aldehydes are sum-
marized in Table 2. In all cases (entries 2-4), we tentatively
assumed that the major isomer has anti-stereochemistry. This was
confirmed by separate experiments.15 The excellent stereoselectivity
in this strategy with 10 is noteworthy. We assume that the major
anti-isomer was formed from transition state D (Figure 3) by
analogy to the reaction of 4 (transition state B). Transition state E,
which would lead to the syn-isomer, is unfavorable because of
interaction between the R-methyl and the R group, as well as the
δ-methyl and TiCl4.
(9) Other Lewis acids such as BF3‚OEt2, Me2AlCl, TiCl2(OiPr)2, and SnCl4
were not effective in terms of yield and stereoselectivity.
(10) Absolute configuration was determined by chemical correlation to (3R)-
1,3-diacetoxyoctane (i, O3 then Me2S; ii, NaBH4; iii, Ac2O, Et3N). Barchi,
J.; Moore, R. E.; Patterson, M. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 8193.
(11) Ohtani, I.; Kusumi, T.; Kashman, Y.; Kakisawa, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1991, 113, 4092.
(12) Absolute configuration was determined by chemical correlation to (1S)-
1,3-diacetoxy-1-phenylpropane (i, O3 then Me2S; ii, NaBH4; iii, Ac2O,
Et3N). Matsuura, F.; Hamada, Y.; Shioiri, T. Tetrahedron 1993, 49, 8211.
(13) Energy-minimized conformation of 4 calculated using Spartan version
’04 version 1.0.1 (PM3) also supported the hypothesis.
(14) Absolute configuration was determined by chemical correlation to methyl
(2R,3R)-3-hydroxy-2-methyloctanoate (i, O3 then Me2S; ii, NaClO2; iii,
TMSCHN2). Watabu, H.; Ohkubo, M.; Matsubara, H.; Sakai, T.; Tsuboi,
S.; Utaka, M. Chem. Lett. 1989, 12, 2183.
(15) Absolute configuration of the hydroxyl group of 11b and 11c was
determined by modified Mosher’s method. (a) 11b was converted to the
known (4S,5R)-4-isopropyl-2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-5-methyl-1,3-dioxane.
Harada, T.; Egusa, T.; Igarashi, Y.; Kinugasa, M.; Oku, A. J. Org. Chem.
2002, 67, 7080. (b) Relative stereochemistry of 11c was determined by
correlating to (1S)-1-[(5S)-2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-5-methyl-1,3-dioxan-4-
yl]-ethanone. Toshima, K.; Jyojima, T.; Yamaguchi, H.; Noguchi, Y.;
Yoshida, T.; Murase, H.; Nakata, M.; Matsumura, S. J. Org. Chem. 1997,
62, 3271. (c) 11d was converted to the known (2S,3S)-2-methyl-1-
phenylpropane-1,3-diol. Abiko, A.; Liu, J.; Masamune, S. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1997, 119, 2586.
In conclusion, we found that the chiral vinylketene silyl N,O-
acetal 4 and 10 underwent a highly regio- and diastereoselective
vinylogous Mukaiyama aldol reaction which provides a unique and
effective means of controlling remote asymmetric induction. From
(16) (a) O’Hagan, D. The Polyketide Metabolites; Ellis Horwood: Chichester,
U.K., 1991. (b) O’Hagan, D. Nat. Prod. Rep. 1995, 12, 1. (c) Katz, D.;
Donadio, S. Annu. ReV. Microbiol. 1993, 47, 875.
JA0465855
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 126, NO. 42, 2004 13605