on the number of DBs, but it is also affected by the steric
availability of DBs for the interaction with silver ions. The
retention increases with increasing number of DBs with the
secondary separation according to the position and geometry
of DBs. Off-line or online two-dimensional (2D) HPLC of
relatively complementary separation modes in NARP and silver-
ion HPLC is a highly promising method for the analysis of
The chemical interesterification (so-called randomization) has
been used in many industrial applications in fat and oil process-
ing.28 It changes physicochemical properties of natural oils with
the assistance of fatty acids already present in TGs in a given oil
or fat. The degree of change is based on the reaction temperature,
reaction time, and catalysts used. The most common catalyst in
this process is sodium methoxide, but it is possible to use bases,
acids, and some metal ions as well. Sodium methoxide has the
highest reactivity, but on the other hand, it is very sensitive to
any trace of water, which stops the reaction due to the hydrolysis
of sodium methoxide. In the first reaction step, the bonds between
glycerol and fatty acids are cleaved yielding a mixture of diacylg-
lycerols (DGs), monoacylglycerols (MGs), and fatty acids. These
species subsequently undergo the interesterification reactions
providing a random distribution of fatty acids in newly formed
TGs.
The main goal of our work is the development of a silver-ion
HPLC/MS method applicable for the separation and quantitation
of regioisomeric ratios of TGs in complex mixtures. TG regioi-
someric pairs are separated by the optimized silver-ion HPLC
method, identified based on characteristic differences in their
APCI mass spectra, and quantified according to the ratio of
chromatographic peak areas. The randomization procedure plays
an important role in generating the series of regioisomeric
standards. Applications to complex natural samples of plant oils
and animal fats containing different TG regioisomers are
demonstrated.
,17
TGs.16
The different ratios of [M + H - RiCOOH]+ fragment ions
in atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI) mass
spectra of positional isomers (regioisomers) of TGs was first
reported in 199618 and later on applied for HPLC/APCI-MS
characterization of prevailing fatty acids in sn-2 position in plant
oils.19 All MS approaches are based on the fact that the neutral
loss of fatty acid from the sn-2 position yields the fragment ion
with a lower relative abundance compared to cleavages from
the side sn-1/3 positions. It is often applied for the assignment
of prevailing fatty acids in the sn-2 position, but for the
quantitative determination of sn-2 occupation the calibration
curves for mixtures of both regioisomers have to be measur-
ed20-23 using the same instrument and ionization technique. APCI
is the most frequently used ionization technique for TG analysis
due to their nonpolar character, but electrospray ionization (ESI)
can be applied as well due to the formation of ammonium
adducts.24-26
If the TG has different fatty acids in sn-1 and sn-3 positions,
then the carbon atom in the sn-2 position becomes a chiral center.
Common analytical techniques working in a nonchiral environ-
ment cannot differentiate between sn-1 and sn-3 enantiomers;
therefore, they are generally treated as equivalent due to the lack
of suitable analytical techniques for their analysis.3,5,19,21 No chiral
separation of intact TGs have been reported so far with the
exception of synthetic TGs containing very different fatty acids
C8:0 versus C22:5 or C22:6,27 which is not a combination occurring
in nature. Due to the absence of any official recommendation for
the designation of sn-1/3 isomers, we list them in the order of
decreasing masses in accordance with our previously proposed
rule,20 e.g., OLP but not PLO. In case of isobaric fatty acids in
sn-1/3 positions, the more common fatty acid is listed first, e.g.,
LnOγLn but not γLnOLn.
EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
Materials. Acetonitrile, 2-propanol, methanol, ethanol, propi-
onitrile, ethylacetate, hexane (solvents are HPLC gradient grade),
and sodium methoxide were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St.
Louis, MO). Standards of tripalmitin (PPP, C16:0), triolein (OOO,
∆9-C18:1), trilinolein (LLL, ∆9,12-C18:2), and trilinolenin (LnLnLn,
∆9,12,15-C18:3) were purchased from Nu-ChekPrep (Elysian,
MN). Palm and olive oils were purchased from Augustus Oil
Limited (Hampshire, England).
Sample Preparation. An amount of 10-15 g of the sample
(sunflower or blackcurrant seeds, fat tissue from pig) was
weighed, and then seeds were carefully crushed in a mortar to
fine particles, whereas fat tissue was crushed in a homogenizer.
Then 15 mL of hexane was added, and this mixture was stirred
occasionally for 15 min. The solid particles were filtered out using
a course filter paper, and the extract was filtered again using a
fine filter (0.45 µm). From the filtered extract, hexane was
evaporated using a mild stream of nitrogen to yield pure plant oil
or animal fat.
Randomization. Amounts of 50 mg of each TG standard and
100 mg of sodium methoxide were weighed into a dry boiling
flask with the addition of 2 mL of hexane dried with molecular
sieves. The mixture was heated for 30 min in a water bath under
the reflux condenser. The reaction temperature was kept constant
at 75 °C. Then, the mixture was extracted with water and three
times with 1 mL of methanol to remove sodium methoxide. The
hexane phase containing randomized analyte was injected into
the silver-ion HPLC system.
(16) Dugo, P.; Favoino, O.; Tranchida, P. Q.; Dugo, G.; Mondello, L. J. Chro-
matogr., A 2004, 1041, 135–142
(17) Van der Klift, E. J. C.; Vivo´-Truyols, G.; Claassen, F. W.; Van Holthoon,
F. L.; Van Beek, T. A. J. Chromatogr., A 2008, 1178, 43–55
(18) Mottram, H. R.; Evershed, R. P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 8593–8596
(19) Mottram, H. R.; Woodbury, S. E.; Evershed, R. P. Rapid Commun. Mass
Spectrom. 1997, 11, 1240–1252
(20) Holcˇapek, M.; Jandera, P.; Zderadicˇka, P.; Hruba´, L. J. Chromatogr., A 2003,
1010, 195–215
(21) Byrdwell, W. C.; Neff, W. E. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2002, 16,
300–319
(22) Fauconnot, L.; Hau, J.; Aeschlimann, J. M.; Fay, L. B.; Dionisi, F. Rapid
Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2004, 18, 218–224
(23) Leskinen, H.; Suomela, J. P.; Kallio, H. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom.
2007, 21, 2361–2373
(24) McAnoy, A. M.; Wu, C. C.; Murphy, R. C. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2005,
16, 1498–1509
(25) Cvacˇka, J.; Hovorka, O.; Jirosˇ, P.; Kindl, J.; Stra´nsky´, K.; Valterova´, I.
J. Chromatogr., A 2006, 1101, 226–237
(26) Malone, M.; Evans, J. J. Lipids 2004, 39, 273–284
(27) Iwasaki, Y.; Yasui, M.; Ishikawa, T.; Irimescu, R.; Hata, K.; Yamane, T.
J. Chromatogr., A 2001, 905, 111–118
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
(28) Marangoni, A. G.; Rousseau, D. In Food Lipids; Akoh, C. C., Min, D. B.,
Eds.; Marcel Dekker: New York, 2002; pp 301-333 and references therein.
.
3904 Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 81, No. 10, May 15, 2009