copper metal during the ring opening reaction. To test for leaching we
filtered the catalyst after the reaction and allowed the filtered catalyst
and the filtrate to react with another aliquot of epoxide. We observed
that the ring opening reaction with the filtered catalyst proceeded at
95% of the original rate, while the filtrate showed less than 5% conver-
sion. On the other hand, the powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern
of the filtered catalyst after the reaction revealed the same pattern as the
original catalyst, suggesting that the original structure of the filtered
catalyst has been kept during the reaction.
discrete Cu() molecule 2 did not catalyze the alcoholysis of
epoxide (Table 1, entry 3).
In summary, we have shown a new structure in coordination
polymer 1 containing btp-bridged tetranuclear Cu() units
weakly connected by nitrate ions. With acetate counteranions
however, a discrete Cu() molecule, 2, was obtained. This result
suggests that both the Jahn–Teller effect of Cu() and the
counteranion effect are important for the construction of
coordination polymers. We have also reported for the first time
that Cu-containing 1 is an efficient heterogeneous catalyst for
regioselective ring opening of epoxide with methanol. This
catalyst system appears to be an efficient, mild, and easily
recyclable method for the alcoholysis of epoxides.
¶ We will discuss a comparison of homogeneous vs. heterogeneous
catalytic activity for the Cu(NO3)2 salt and catalyst 1 elsewhere.
1 S. Noro, R. Kitaura, M. Komdo, S. Kitagawa, T. Ishii, H. Matsuzaka
and M. Yamashita, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2002, 124, 2568 and references
therein.
2 S. R. Batten and R. Robson, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 1998, 37, 1461;
M. J. Zaworotko, Chem. Soc. Rev., 1994, 283; P. J. Hagrman,
D. Hagrman and J. Zubieta, Angw. Chem., Int. Ed., 1999, 38, 2638;
M. Munakata, L. P. Wu and T. Kuroda-Sowa, Adv. Inorg. Chem.,
1999, 46, 173; M. Eddadoudi, D. B. Moler, H. Li, B. Chen,
T. M. Reineke, M. O’Keeffe and O. M. Yaghi, Acc. Chem. Res., 2001,
34, 319; B. Moulton and M. J. Zaworotko, Chem. Rev., 2001, 101,
1629.
Y. Kim acknowledges the Korean Science & Engineering
Foundation (R03-2000-000-00002-0) and C. Kim acknowledges
the Korean Research Foundation (DP0270 and 2002-070-
C00053). We thank Dr Alan Lough from the University of
Toronto, Canada for X-ray data collection.
3 M. Du, X.-H. Bu, Y.-M. Guo and H. Liu, Inorg. Chem., 2002, 41,
4904 and references therein.
Notes and references
† A water solution of Cu(NO3)2 was carefully layered with a methanol
solution of btp ligand. Anal. calc. for C27H21Cu2N25O12, 1: C, 31.96; H,
2.23; N, 34.49. Found: C, 32.95; H, 2.31; N, 34.53%.
For C22H20CuN14O4, 2: C, 43.45; H, 3.32; N, 32.26. Found: C, 43.45;
H, 3.30; N, 32.23%.
4 A few other metal-containing coordination polymers have been
reported to show the catalytic activities: M. Fujita, Y. J. Kwon,
S. Washizu and K. Ogura, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1994, 116, 1151;
T. Sawaki, T. Dewa and Y. Aoyama, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120,
8539; J. S. Seo, D. Whang, H. Lee, S. I. Jun, J. Oh, Y. J. Jeon and K.
Kim, Nature, 2000, 404, 982.
5 Y. Kim, S.-J. Kim and A. J. Lough, Polyhedron, 2001, 20, 3073.
6 D. A. Evans, T. Rovis, M. C. Kozlowski and J. S. Tedrow, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1999, 121, 1994; D. A. Evans, S. J. Miller and T. Lactka,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1993, 115, 6460; G. Sekar, A. DattaGupta and
V. K. Singh, J. Org. Chem., 1998, 63, 2961; I. E. Marko, A. Gautier,
I. Chelle-Regnaut, P. R. Giles, M. Tsukazaki, C. J. Urch and
S. M. Brown, J. Org. Chem., 1998, 63, 7576; M. B. Andrus and
B. W. Poehlein, Tetrahedron Lett., 2000, 41, 1013.
‡ Crystal data for compound 1: C27H21Cu2N25O12, 0.12 × 0.11 ×
0.10 mm3, FW = 1014.77, triclinic, a = 11.1473(3), b = 13.3356(3),
c = 13.4689(3) Å, α = 78.475(2), β = 70.419(2), γ = 76.033(2)Њ,
V = 1815.12(8) Å3, Z = 2, µ(Mo-Kα) = 1.274 mmϪ1, 23632 measured
reflections [R(int) = 0.073] were used in all calculations, final R = 0.0751
(Rw = 0.1003) with reflections having intensities greater than 2σ,
GOF(F 2) = 1.043. CCDC reference number 196739.
Crystal data for compound 2: C22H24CuN14O6, 0.35 × 0.3 × 0.25
mm3, FW = 644.09, triclinic, a = 6.867(3), b = 9.304(2), c = 10.935(4) Å,
α = 93.40(2), β = 102.42(3), γ = 97.11(2)Њ, V = 674.3(4) Å3, Z = 1,
µ(Mo-Kα) = 0.877 mmϪ1, 2882 measured reflections [R(int) = 0.0152]
were used in all calculations, final R = 0.0405 (Rw = 0.1026) with reflec-
tions having intensities greater than 2σ, GOF(F 2) = 1.117. CCDC refer-
for crystallographic data in CIF or other electronic format.
7 Y. Kim, S. K. Choi, S.-M. Park, W. Nam and S.-J. Kim, Inorg. Chem.
Commun., 2002, 5, 612 and references therein; D. W. Yoo, S.-K. Yoo,
C. Kim and J.-K. Lee, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 2002, 3931.
8 J. G. Smith, Synthesis, 1984, 629; D. M. Hodgson, A. R. Gibbs and
G. P. Lee, Tetrahedron, 1996, 52, 14361; N. Iranpoor and H. Adibi,
Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 2000, 73, 675.
§ The decrease in the catalytic activity is presumably due to leaching of
9 L. J. Farrugia, J. Appl. Crystallogr., 1997, 30, 565.
D a l t o n T r a n s . , 2 0 0 3 , 1 4 5 4 – 1 4 5 6
1456