C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Table 1. Iridium-Catalyzed Hydrogenation of Substrates 3-10a
primarily based on discrimination between a larger and a smaller
geminal substituent. Thus, due to the pseudo-C2 symmetry of the
reactive site, only one large substituent is required on the alkene,
but two large substituents in trans configuration will perform better.
The nonsubstituted position on the alkene will preferentially be
oriented toward the bulky phenyl substituent of the oxazole part in
the catalyst. Thus, tetra-substituted alkenes are poor substrates for
this catalyst, i.e., alkene 10. For alkenes with the most bulky
substituents cis, such as 9, the selectivity could be compromised.
R,â-Unsaturated esters add a complicating electronic effect to the
selectivity. B3LYP/LACVP calculations on trans-methyl crotonate
suggest a strong preference for â-addition of the hydride (5 kcal/
mol). This results in low converversion and poor enantioselectivity
in the reduction of methyl R-methyl cinnamate.
In conclusion, we have used a computationally derived selectivity
model to design new catalysts for hydrogenation of disubstituted
styrenes. This new class of catalysts is highly selective and
applicable to a wide range of substrates. The enantioselectivities
reported here are in the range of the best previously reported.
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by grants from
the Swedish Research Council (VR) and SELCHEM graduate
program. A.B. thanks the Norwegian Research Council (grant
151722/V30) and NorFA for financial support. We are also very
grateful to Professor Lars Kristian Hansen (University of Tromsø)
for performing the X-ray analysis.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures for
the preparations of the ligands, complexes, hydrogenation procedures,
characterization data, and chiral separation data (PDF, CIF). This
a Conditions: pressure, 30 bar (entry 1), 50 bar (entries 2-4, 6-9), 100
bar (entry 5); all reactions were run at room temperature for 2 h, except for
entries 5 and 6, where the reaction was run overnight instead; catalyst
loading, 0.5 mol %, except for entries 5 and 6, where 1 mol % was used
instead; all reactions were run in CH2Cl2 as 0.25 M solutions.
References
(1) Brown J. M. In ComprehensiVe Asymmetric Catalysis; Jacobsen, E. N.,
Pfaltz, A., Yamamoto, H., Eds.; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1999; Vol. I,
pp 121-182.
(2) (a) Lightfoot, A.; Schnider, P.; Pfaltz, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998,
37, 2897-2899. (b) Blankenstein, J.; Pfaltz, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2001, 40, 4445-4447. (c) Menges, F.; Neuburger, M.; Pfaltz, A. Org.
Lett. 2002, 4, 4713-4716. (d) Durry, W. J., III; Zimmerman, N.; Keenan,
M.; Hayashi, M.; Kaiser, S.; Goddard, R.; Pfaltz, A. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2004, 43, 70-74. (e) Perry, M. C.; Cui, X.; Powell, M.; Hou, D.;
Reibenspies, J.; Burgess, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 113-123. (f)
Tang, W.; Wang, W.; Zhang, X. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 943-
946. (g) Xu, G.; Gilbertson, S. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 953-955. (h)
Bunlaksananurson, T.; Polborn, K.; Knochel, P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2003, 42, 3941-3943.
(3) Crabtree, R. H. Acc. Chem. Res. 1979, 12, 331-338.
(4) Pfaltz, A.; Blankenstein, J.; Hilgraf, R.; Ho¨rmann, E.; McIntyre, S.;
Menges, F.; Scho¨nleber, M.; Smidt, S. P.; Wu¨stenberg, B.; Zimmermann,
N. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2003, 345 (Nos. 1+2), 33-43.
(5) Brandt, P.; Hedberg, C.; Andersson, P. G. Chem. Eur. J. 2003, 339-347.
(6) Parakash, I.; Parakash, O.; Bailey, B. R., III; Moriarty, R. M. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1985, 107, 1345-1378.
(7) Rok, L.; Yup, Y. S. J. Heterocycles 1998, 48, 875-884.
(8) Absolute configuration of alcohol 4 was determined by X-ray analysis of
the corresponding (S-1-phenylethyl)carbamic acid 6,6-dimethyl-2-phenyl-
4,5,6,7-tetrahydrobenzooxazol-4-yl ester (15). Crystallographic data have
been deposited with the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre as
supplementary publication no. CCDC 237031. Copies of the data can be
obtained free of charge, on application to CCDC, 12 Union Rd., Cambridge
CB2 1EZ, UK (fax +44-(0)1223-336033 or e-mail deposit@
ccdc.cam.ac.uk).
Figure 3. (Left) Structure of the selectivity-determining transition state of
the coupled migration insertion/oxidative addition of dihydrogen. (Right)
Selectivity model using the ligand structure of the optimized transition state
and a schematic substrate molecule.
substrate 6 being hydrogenated by catalyst 1a (Figure 3).9 The
calculated structure, being very similar to those previously reported,5
clearly shows a chiral pocket well suited to accommodate an alkene
with large trans substituents. The enantiofacial selectivity is
(9) Transition-state optimization was performed at the B3LYP/LACVP level
of theory in the Jaguar program. For details, see ref 5.
JA0464241
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 126, NO. 44, 2004 14309