Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
Article
3.01 (A/B = 100/0), 3.30 (A/B = 100/0), where A = 2% CH3CN/
H2O with 5 mM NH4OAc, B = 95% CH3CN/H2O with 5 mM
NH4OAc, at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min, with UV detection at 220 nm,
at column temperature of 40 °C. A part of compounds were assessed
by the following method. The analytical HPLC system consisted of
Prominence UFLC (Shimadzu Corporation, Japan), L-column2 ODS
column (30 mm × 2.1 mm I.D., 2 μm) (Chemicals Evaluation and
Research Institute, Japan) at column temperature of 50 °C and nano
quantity analyte detector, QT-500 (Quant technologies LLC, MN,
USA). The mobile phase A and B are a mixture of distillated water, 50
mmol/L ammonium acetate aqueous solution, and acetonitrile
(8:1:1,v/v/v) and a mixture of acetonitrile and 50 mmol/L ammonium
acetate aqueous solution (9:1,v/v), respectively. The flow rate
maintained 0.5 mL/min. The mixture ratio of mobile phase A and B
changed from 95/5 to 5/95 with a 2 min linear gradient and
subsequently with a 1 min isocratic elution 5/95. Elemental analyses
were carried out by Takeda Analytical Laboratories Limited and were
within 0.4% of the theoretical values unless otherwise noted. The
purity of compounds was assessed by elemental analysis or analytical
HPLC (>95%). Experimental procedures for compounds 14−19
including their intermediates were disclosed in the previous literature
(Supporting Information).21
4′-Hydroxy-2′,6′-dimethylbiphenyl-3-carbaldehyde (44). 4-
Bromo-3,5-dimethylphenol (43) 10.3 g, 51.0 mmol) and (3-
formylphenyl)boronic acid (7.67 g, 51.2 mmol) were dissolved in a
mixture of 1 M sodium carbonate aq (150 mL), EtOH (50 mL), and
toluene (150 mL). After argon substitution, tetrakis-
(triphenylphosphine)palladium(0) (2.95 g, 2.55 mmol) was added.
The reaction mixture was stirred at 80 °C under argon atmosphere for
24 h. The reaction mixture was cooled, and water was added. The
mixture was diluted with AcOEt, and the insoluble material was
filtered off through Celite. The organic layer of the filtrate was washed
with brine, dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate, and concentrated.
The residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography
(AcOEt−hexane = 10:90−40:60) to give a solid, which was triturated
with hexane−AcOEt to give 44 (9.53 g, 83%) as pale-yellow crystals.
1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 1.97 (s, 6H), 4.69 (s, 1H), 6.62 (s, 2H), 7.42 (dt,
and tributylphosphine (0.448 mL, 1.80 mmol) in toluene (20 mL) was
added portionwise 1,1′-(azodicarbonyl)dipiperidine (0.454 g, 1.80
mmol) at 0 °C, and the mixture was stirred at room temperature under
nitrogen atmosphere for 15 h. Hexane (10 mL) was added, and the
insoluble material was removed by filtration. The filtrate was
concentrated, and the residue was purified by silica gel column
chromatography (AcOEt−hexane =5:95−30:70) to give methyl (6-
{[4′-(2-ethoxyethoxy)-2′,6′-dimethylbiphenyl-3-yl]methoxy}-2,3-dihy-
1
dro-1-benzofuran-3-yl)acetate (0.481 g, 89%) as a colorless oil. H
NMR (CDCl3) δ 1.25 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H), 1.98 (s, 6H), 2.55 (dd, J =
16.5, 9.2 Hz, 1H), 2.75 (dd, J = 16.5, 5.4 Hz, 1H), 3.62 (q, J = 7.1 Hz,
2H), 3.71 (s, 3H), 3.75−3.85 (m, 3H), 4.14 (t, J = 5.1 Hz, 2H), 4.26
(dd, J = 9.2, 6.0 Hz, 1H), 4.75 (t, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H), 5.05 (s, 2H), 6.45−
6.50 (m, 2H), 6.68 (s, 2H), 7.01 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.08 (dt, J = 7.0,
1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.16 (s, 1H), 7.35−7.44 (m, 2H). MS m/z 491 (M +
H)+. Step 2: To a solution of methyl (6-{[4′-(2-ethoxyethoxy)-2′,6′-
dimethylbiphenyl-3-yl]methoxy}-2,3-dihydro-1-benzofuran-3-yl)-
acetate (1.96 g, 4.00 mmol) in MeOH (20 mL) and THF (20 mL)
was added 2 M NaOH aqueous solution (6 mL), and the mixture was
stirred at room temperature for 3 days. The mixture was diluted with
water, acidified with 10% citric acid aqueous solution, and extracted
with AcOEt. The organic layer was washed with brine, dried over
MgSO4, and concentrated. The residue was purified by silica gel
column chromatography (AcOEt−hexane = 20:80−80:20) and
crystallized from heptane−AcOEt to give 53 (1.12 g, 59%) as
1
colorless prisms; mp 72 °C. H NMR (CDCl3) δ 1.25 (t, J = 7.1 Hz,
3H), 1.98 (s, 6H), 2.61 (dd, J = 16.8, 9.2 Hz, 1H), 2.80 (dd, J = 16.8,
5.4 Hz, 1H), 3.62 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 3.75−3.85 (m, 3H), 4.14 (t, J =
5.0 Hz, 2H), 4.28 (dd, J = 9.2, 6.0 Hz, 1H), 4.75 (t, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H),
5.05 (s, 2H), 6.45−6.51 (m, 2H), 6.68 (s, 2H), 7.03−7.10 (m, 2H),
7.16 (s, 1H), 7.34−7.44 (m, 2H). MS m/z 477 (M + H)+. HPLC
purity (220 nm) 100%. Anal. Calcd for C29H32O6: C, 73.09; H, 6.77.
Found: C, 73.06; H, 6.73.
Ca Influx Activity of CHO Cells Expressing Human GPR40/
FFA1 (FLIPR Assay). CHO dhfr cells stably expressing human
GPR40/FFA1 (accession no. NM_005303) were plated and incubated
overnight in 5% CO2 at 37 °C. Then, cells were incubated in loading
buffer (recording medium containing 2.5 μg/mL fluorescent calcium
indicator Fluo 4-AM (Molecular Devices), 2.5 mmol/L probenecid
(Dojindo), and 0.1% fatty acid-free BSA (Sigma)) for 60 min at 37 °C.
Various concentrations of test compounds or γ-linolenic acid (Sigma)
were added into the cells and increase of the intracellular Ca2+
concentration after addition were monitored by FLIPR Tetra system
(Molecular Devices) for 90 s. The agonistic activities of test
compounds and γ-linolenic acid on human GPR40/FFA1 were
expressed as [(A − B)/(C − B)] × 100 (increase of the intracellular
Ca2+ concentration (A) in test compounds-treated cells, (B) in vehicle-
treated cells, and (C) in 10 μM γ-linolenic acid-treated cells). EC50
values and 95% confidence intervals of each compound were obtained
with Prism 5 software (GraphPad).
Preparation of CHO Membrane for GPR40/FFA1 Receptor
Binding Assay. Cell lines stably expressing human GPR40/FFA1 and
rat GPR40/FFA1 were used for the experiments. Each cell was
cultured in Minimum Essential Medium Alpha (MEM-Alpha,
Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% dialyzed Fetal-Bovine-Serum
(dialyzed FBS, Thermo Trace Ltd.), 100 unit/mL penicillin, and 100
unit/mL streptomycin in 5% CO2/95% air atmosphere at 37 °C. Cells
were harvested at confluence in Dulbecco’s Phosphate-Buffered-Saline
(D-PBS, Invitrogen) containing 1 mM EDTA and centrifuged. Cells
were homogenized in ice-cold membrane preparation buffer (50 mM
Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 5 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM PMSF (Wako), 20 μg/mL
leupeptin, 0.1 μg/mL pepstatin A, 100 μg/mL Phosphoramidon,
Peptide Institute, Inc.) and centrifuged (700g, 10 min, 4 °C). The
supernatant was filtered through 40 μm Cell Strainer (BD Falcon) and
ultracentrifuged (100000g, 1 h, 4 °C) with Optima L-100 XP
Ultracentrifuge (Beckman Coulter). The precipitation was suspended
in the same buffer, and the protein concentration was determined with
the BCA Protein assay reagent (Pierce) following membrane
solubilization with 0.1% SDS and 0.1 M NaOH aqueous solution.
J = 7.7, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 7.59 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.66 (t, J = 1.7 Hz, 1H),
7.86 (dt, J = 7.6, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 10.05 (s, 1H). MS m/z 227 (M + H)+.
[4′-(2-Ethoxyethoxy)-2′,6′-dimethylbiphenyl-3-yl]methanol
(42i). Step 1: A mixture of 44 (8.52 g, 37.7 mmol), 2-chloroethyl ethyl
ether (6.15 g, 56.6 mmol), K2CO3 (6.25 g, 45.2 mmol), and KI (1.25
g, 7.54 mmol) in DMF (40 mL) was stirred under nitrogen
atmosphere at 80 °C for 18 h. After evaporation of the solvent, the
residue was partitioned between water and AcOEt. The extract was
washed with brine, dried over anhydrous MgSO4, and concentrated.
The residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography
(AcOEt−hexane =5:95−25:75) to give 4′-(2-ethoxyethoxy)-2′,6′-
1
dimethylbiphenyl-3-carbaldehyde (10.0 g, 89%) as a colorless oil. H
NMR (CDCl3) δ 1.26 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H), 1.99 (s, 6H), 3.62 (q, J = 7.0
Hz, 2H), 3.81 (t, J = 4.9 Hz, 2H), 4.15 (t, J = 4.9 Hz, 2H), 6.71 (s,
2H), 7.42 (dt, J = 7.5, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 7.58 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.66 (t, J =
1.5 Hz, 1H), 7.86 (dt, J = 7.5, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 10.05 (s, 1H). MS m/z 299
(M + H)+. Step 2: To a solution of the obtained oil (4.21 g, 14.1
mmol) in MeOH (15 mL) and THF (30 mL) was added portionwise
NaBH4 (0.533 g, 14.1 mmol) at 0 °C, and the mixture was stirred
under nitrogen atmosphere at 0 °C for 2 h. The mixture was quenched
with water and 1 M HCl aqueous solution and extracted with AcOEt.
The extract was washed with brine, dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, and
concentrated. The residue was purified by silica gel column
chromatography (AcOEt−hexane = 20:80−60:40) to give a solid.
Recrystallization from hexane−AcOEt gave 42i (3.37 g, 79%) as
colorless crystals. 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 1.25 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H), 1.66 (t,
J = 5.9 Hz, 1H), 2.00 (s, 6H), 3.62 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 3.80 (t, J = 5.1
Hz, 2H), 4.14 (t, J = 5.1 Hz, 2H), 4.73 (d, J = 5.9 Hz, 2H), 6.69 (s,
2H), 7.06 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 7.12 (s, 1H), 7.33 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H),
7.40 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H). MS m/z 301 (M + H)+.
(6-{[4′-(2-Ethoxyethoxy)-2′,6′-dimethylbiphenyl-3-yl]-
methoxy}-2,3-dihydro-1-benzofuran-3-yl)acetic Acid (53). Step
1: To a mixture of 7e (0.250 g, 1.20 mmol), 42h (0.330 g, 1.10 mmol),
1550
dx.doi.org/10.1021/jm2012968 | J. Med. Chem. 2012, 55, 1538−1552