C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Table 1. Conversion of 2,3-Epoxy Alcohols to 2,3-Disubstituted THF Ringsa
a Typical reaction conditions (3.0-10.0 equiv trimethylsulfoxonium iodide, NaH, 0.1 M epoxy alcohol in DMSO, 80 °C, 36 h). b In THF with nBuLi as
the base.
Scheme 3
Since it is relatively simple to obtain 2,3-epoxy-alcohols in high
enantiomeric excess via the Sharpless asymmetric epoxidation, this
can be a powerful methodology in gaining entry into the synthesis
of THF rings with stereodefined substituents. Future work is focused
on methods to control regioselectivity of ylide attack, to increase
the extent of substitution by varying groups on the epoxide and
ylide, and to use this approach to synthesize larger rings.
Acknowledgment. Generous support was provided in part by
the Michigan Economic Development Corporation (GR-183). The
authors are thankful for contributions made by Ms. Abra Jeffers.
Utilization of the Payne rearrangement for regiochemical control
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures and
spectral data for compounds 3-45 (PDF). This material is available
was initially invoked since optically enriched 2,3-epoxy alcohols
can be generated with ease; however, in theory, any epoxide
containing a neighboring free hydroxyl available for cyclization
can be used provided the regiochemistry of ylide attack can be
controlled by steric or electronic factors. The substrates in Scheme
3 were prepared to circumvent the problems encountered with alkyl-
substituted epoxy alcohols such as 33 (Table 1, entry 14) in the
Payne rearrangement approach. The reaction could be performed
in either DMSO using ylide generated from trimethylsulfoxonium
iodide and NaH or in THF using ylide generated with nBuLi as
the base. It is known that THF retards Payne rearrangement and
thus is a good medium to promote direct attack of the epoxide with
ylide generated in situ.22 Thus, reaction of 41 (Payne rearranged
equivalent of 33, 2:1 mixture of diastereomers) yielded 34 and 34a
(epimeric at the hydroxyl bearing carbon) in better yields as
compared to the reaction of 33, which would require in situ Payne
rearrangement.
In some cases, such as 42, the choice of solvent is not important
(55% with THF, 56% with DMSO) but, more often than not, can
be crucial to the success of the reaction. For example, 44 was treated
with dimethylsulfoxonium methylide in both DMSO and tetrahy-
drofuran as solvents. In DMSO, the desired 40 (diastereomeric
mixture) was obtained in 18% yield and the elimination product in
27% yield, results similar to entry 17 in Table 1. However, when
the reaction was performed in THF as the solvent, 40 was obtained
in 53% yield (mixture of diastereoismers) with no evidence of
elimination products. Racemization was a problem with epoxide
45, since the enantiomeric compounds resulting from Payne
rearrangement both undergo indiscriminate attack by the ylide.
In conclusion, we have developed a new method for the synthesis
of 2,3-substituted THF rings. The stereochemistry that is set by
the asymmetric epoxidation is translated fully to the final product.
References
(1) Johnson, R. A.; Sharpless, K. B. In Catalytic Asymmetric Synthesis; Ojima,
I., Ed.; Wiley-VCH: New York, 1993; pp 101-158.
(2) Sasaki, M.; Tanino, K.; Hirai, A.; Miyashita, M. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 1789-
1791.
(3) Poch, M.; Alcon, M.; Moyano, A.; Pericas, M. A.; Riera, A. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1993, 34, 7781-7784.
(4) Choudary, B. M.; Rani, S. S.; Kantam, M. L. Synth. Commun. 1990, 20,
2313-2317.
(5) Kirshenbaum, K. S.; Sharpless, K. B. Chem. Lett. 1987, 11-14.
(6) Ko, S. Y.; Sharpless, K. B. J. Org. Chem. 1986, 51, 5413-5415.
(7) Behrens, C. H.; Sharpless, K. B. J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50, 5696-5704.
(8) Behrens, C. H.; Ko, S. Y.; Sharpless, K. B.; Walker, F. J. J. Org. Chem.
1985, 50, 5687-5696.
(9) Caron, M.; Sharpless, K. B. J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50, 1557-1560.
(10) Roush, W. R.; Brown, R. J.; Dimare, M. J. Org. Chem. 1983, 48, 5083-
5093.
(11) Walker, B. J. Organophosphorus Chem. 1996, 27, 264-307.
(12) Vedejs, E.; Peterson, M. J. In Topics in Stereochemistry; John Wiley &
Sons: New York, 1994; Vol. 21, pp 1-157.
(13) Okuma, K.; Tanaka, Y.; Kaji, S.; Ohta, H. J. Org. Chem. 1983, 48, 5133-
5134.
(14) Fitton, A. O.; Hill, J.; Jane, D. E.; Millar, R. Synthesis 1987, 1140-1142.
(15) Trost, B. M.; Melvin, L. S., Jr. Sulfur Ylides. Emerging Synthetic
Intermediates; Academic Press: New York, 1975; Vol. 31.
(16) Possible counterion influence in the conversion of 2 to 3 was investigated
with using Li, Na, and K salts. The isolated yields of 3 LiHMDS,
NaHMDS, and KHMDS as bases were 59%, 92%, and 82%, respectively.
Per the suggestion of the reviewer, microwave-assisted conversion of 2
to 3 with NaHMDS as the base in DMSO greatly reduced the reaction
time (30 pulses, 15 s/pulse) while maintaining a high yield of product
(see Supporting Information for details).
(17) Payne, G. B. J. Org. Chem. 1962, 27, 3819-3822.
(18) Hanson, R. M. Org. React. 2002, 60, 1-156.
(19) Wrobel, J. E.; Ganem, B. J. Org. Chem. 1983, 48, 3761-3764.
(20) Rickborn, B.; Thummel, R. P. J. Org. Chem. 1969, 34, 3583-3586.
(21) Alcaraz, L.; Cridland, A.; Kinchin, E. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 4051-4053.
(22) Page, P. C. B.; Rayner, C. M.; Sutherland, I. O. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1 1990, 1375-1382.
JA0469075
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 126, NO. 42, 2004 13601