708
B. Santhamma, K. Nickisch / Steroids 78 (2013) 707–710
4a is a known compound and spectral data were found to be
matching [14].
1603, 1251, 1087, 827. 1H NMR (d, 300 MHz, CDCl3) 0.02 and
0.04 (2s, 6H, –Si(CH3)2, 0.80 (d, J = 7 Hz, 3H, –CH3), 0.89 (m, 12H,
4Â –CH3), 3.60 (t, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H, –CHO), 6.57 (m, 1H, –ArH), 6.66
(dd, J1 = 3 Hz, J2 = 6 Hz, 1H, –ArH), 7.01 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H). 13C
NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) À4.8, À4.5, 15.1, 17.3, 18.1, 23.4, 25.9,
26.9, 30.2, 30.5, 30.9, 36.7, 43.7, 45.0, 51.3, 83.0, 91.9, 113.2,
115.4, 127.9, 129.7, 138.9, 153.8. HRMS calculated for C25H39O2Si
(M/ZÀH) 399.2718. Found 399.2719.
2.2. General procedure for the aromatization reaction
2.2.1. 11b,17b-Dibenzyloxy estra-1,3,5 (10)-triene-3-ol (2)
A solution of compound 1 (1 g, 2.12 mmol) in anhydrous THF
(10 mL) was cooled to À78 °C and was treated dropwise with a
1 M THF solution of lithium bis(trimethylsilyl)amide (LiHMDS)
(4.24 mL, 4.24 mmol). The resulting solution was stirred at
À78 °C for 1.5 h. A solution of phenylselenyl chloride in anhydrous
THF (10 mL) was added to the reaction mixture at À78 °C and was
stirred for 3 h with warming to 0 °C. TLC showed complete conver-
sion of starting material to the product. The reaction was quenched
by the addition of saturated ammonium chloride (20 mL) and was
extracted with EtOAc. The combined organic layers were washed
with water, brine and were dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate.
The solvent was removed in vacuo to afford crude 1a as a dark
brown viscous liquid (1.25 g). The crude 1a thus obtained was dis-
solved in THF (20 mL) and was treated with 30% hydrogen perox-
ide solution (0.5 mL, 4.24 mmol). The reaction mixture was
stirred at room temperature for 3 h and was quenched by the addi-
tion of saturated Na2S2O3 solution. The reaction mixture was ex-
tracted with EtOAc (2 Â 30 mL) and the combined organic layers
were washed with water, brine and dried over anhydrous sodium
sulfate. The solvent was removed in vacuo to give crude 2 (1 g)
as a dark brown solid, which was purified by chromatography on
a silica column eluting with 20% EtOAc–hexane solvent system.
This gave the pure compound 2 as a pale yellow solid (530 mg,
53%) m.p. 152–153 °C IR (cmÀ1) 3303, 2871, 1582, 1099, 1041, 701.
1H NMR (d, 300 MHz, CDCl3) 1.10 (s, 3H, –CH3), 3.48 (t,
J = 8.4 Hz, –CHO), 4.28 (m, 1H, CHO), 4.36 (d, J = 11.7 Hz, 1H, –
OCH2), 4.58 (m, 3H, –OCH2), 4.68 (s, 1H, –OH), 6.53 (m, 2H, ArH),
6.81 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H, –ArH), 7.17 (m, 2H, ArH), 7.28 (m, 4H, –
ArH), 7.37 (m, 4H, –ArH). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) 13.3, 23.0,
27.2, 27.7, 29.7, 33.6, 38.6, 43.3, 49.5, 51.2, 59.4, 70.4, 71.6, 74.0,
88.7, 112.6, 115.5, 127.4, 127.5, 128.0, 128.3, 129.2, 138.4, 138.9,
139.3, 152.9. HRMS calculated for C32H35O3 (M/ZÀH) 467.2586.
Found 467.2632.
2.2.4. 17b-tert-Butyldimethylsilyloxy,7a,11b-dimethyl-estra-
1,3,5(10)-triene-3-ol (4c)
Compound 4c was prepared from 3c in 69% yield following the
general procedure described for 2 except phenylselenyl bromide
was used in place of phenylselenyl chloride and the following
amounts of reagents were used: 3c (353 mg, 0.85 mmol), phenyl-
selenyl bromide (401 mg, 2 mmol), LiHMDS (2.6 mL, 2.6 mmol),
30% hydrogen peroxide (0.13 mL, 1.1 mmol). The product was puri-
fied using a silica column eluting with 10% EtOAc–hexane solvent
system. 4c: 180 mg, white crystalline solid. m.p. 179–181 °C. IR
(cmÀ1) 3307, 2900, 1502, 1246, 1112, 839. 1H NMR (d, 300 MHz,
CDCl3) 0.03 (2s, 6H, –Si(CH3)2), 0.80 (d, J = 7 Hz, 3H, –CH3), 0.85
(m, 6H, 2Â –CH3), 0.9 (s, 9H, 3Â –CH3), 3.62 (t, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H, –
CHO), 6.52 (m, 1H, –ArH), 6.62 (dd, J1 = 3 Hz, J2 = 6 Hz, 1H, –ArH),
7.03 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) À4.7, À4.5,
12.3, 15.0, 17.4, 18.1, 22.7, 25.9, 27.7, 30.8, 30.9, 35.8, 38.2, 42.5,
43.9, 44.9, 45.7, 48.2, 83.0, 113.0, 116.0, 127.9, 130.0, 137.6,
152.9. HRMS calculated for C26H41O2Si (M/ZÀH) 413.2876. Found
413.2874.
2.2.5. 13b-Ethyl-11-methylene-18-nor-estra-1,3,5(10)-triene-3,17b-
ol (6a)
Compound 6a was prepared from 5a in 59% yield following the
general procedure described for 2 except phenylselenyl bromide
was used in place of phenylselenyl chloride and the following
amounts of reagents were used: 5a (460 mg, 1.5 mmol), phenylsel-
enyl bromide (722 mg, 3.1 mmol), LiHMDS (7.7 mL, 7.7 mmol), 30%
hydrogen peroxide (0.17 mL, 1.5 mmol). The product was purified
using a silica column eluting with 30% EtOAc–hexane solvent sys-
tem. 6a: 260 mg, pale yellow amorphous solid. IR (cmÀ1) 3320,
2938, 1616, 1288, 1058, 801. 1H NMR (d, 300 MHz, CDCl3) 1.07 (t,
J = 7.5 Hz, 3H, –CH3), 3.93 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H, –CHO), 4.74 (bs, 1H, –
OH), 4.87 (s, 1H, @CH), 4.98 (s, 1H, @CH), 6.58 (s, 1H, –ArH), 6.63
(dd, J1 = 3 Hz, J2 = 6 Hz, 1H, –ArH), 7.21 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H, –ArH).
13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) 9.2, 18.8, 22.0, 26.8, 30.7, 31.3, 41.6,
44.3, 47.2, 51.3, 52.2, 83.3, 109.0, 112.4, 115.4, 127.9, 131.4,
2.2.2. 11b-Methyl-estra-1,3,5(10)-triene-3, 17b-diol (4a)
Compound 4a was prepared from 3a in 60% yield following the
general procedure described for 2 except phenylselenyl bromide
was used in place of phenylselenyl chloride and the following
amounts of reagents were used: 3a (288 mg, 1 mmol), phenylsele-
nyl bromide (472 mg, 2 mmol), LiHMDS (5 mL, 5 mmol), 30%
hydrogen peroxide (0.17 mL, 1.5 mmol). The product was purified
using a silica column eluting with 30% EtOAc–hexane solvent sys-
tem. 4a: 170 mg, pale yellow amorphous solid. IR (cmÀ1) 3336,
2908, 1616, 1246, 1058, 822. 1H NMR (d, 300 MHz, CDCl3) 0.88
(m, 6H, 2Â –CH3), 3.71 (m, 1H, –CHO), 4.68 (s, 1H, –OH), 6.54 (m,
1H, –ArH), 6.63 (dd, J1 = 2.7 Hz, J2 = 5.7 Hz, –ArH), 7.05 (d,
J = 8.3 Hz, –ArH). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) 14.8, 17.3, 23.2, 26.8,
30.1, 30.4, 30.5, 33.8, 43.4, 44.4, 48.9, 51.6, 83.1, 112.9, 115.2,
128.1, 130.4, 139.1, 152.9.
139.5, 147.5, 153.2. HRMS calculated for
297.1855. Found 297.1860.
C
20H25O2 (M/ZÀH)
2.2.6. 13b-Ethyl-11-methylene-18,19-dinor-17a-pregna-1,3,5(10)-
triene-20-yne-3,17b-ol (6b)
Compound 6b was prepared from 5b in 84% yield following the
general procedure described for 2 except phenylselenyl bromide
was used in place of phenylselenyl chloride and the following
amounts of reagents were used: 5b (324 mg, 1 mmol), phenylsele-
nyl bromide (472 mg, 2 mmol), LiHMDS (5 mL, 5 mmol), 30%
hydrogen peroxide (0. 22 mL, 2 mmol). The product was purified
using a silica column eluting with 40% EtOAc–hexane solvent sys-
tem. 6b: 270 mg, pale yellow amorphous solid. IR (cmÀ1) 3301,
2940, 2245, 1611, 1246, 1053, 905. 1H NMR (d, 300 MHz, CDCl3)
1.06 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H, –CH3), 2.05 (s, 1H), 3.03 (d, J = 10 Hz, 1H),
4.72 (s, 1H, –OH), 4.88 (s, 1H, @CH), 5.00 (s, 1H, @CH), 6.56 (d,
J = 2.6 Hz, 1H, –ArH), 6.63 (dd, J1 = 2.6 Hz, J2 = 6 Hz, 1H, –ArH),
7.21 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H, –ArH). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) 9.3, 19.9,
21.7, 26.9, 30.7, 40.0, 40.4, 42.0, 50.9, 52.1, 74.2, 81.1, 87.8, 109.2,
112.5, 115.3, 127.8, 131.3, 139.5, 147.8, 153.1.
2.2.3. 17b-tert-butyldimethylsilyloxy, 11b-methyl-estra-1,3,5(10)-
triene-3-ol (4b)
Compound 4b was prepared from 3b in 79% yield following the
general procedure described for 2 except phenylselenyl bromide
was used in place of phenylselenyl chloride and the following
amounts of reagents were used: 3b (403 mg, 1 mmol), phenylsele-
nyl bromide (283 mg, 1.2 mmol), LiHMDS (3 mL, 3 mmol), 30%
hydrogen peroxide (0. 13 mL, 1.2 mmol). The product was purified
using a silica column eluting with 10% EtOAc–hexane solvent sys-
tem. 4b: 320 mg, white amorphous solid. IR (cmÀ1) 3303, 2883,