2+
Pd4(dppm)4(H)2 Cluster
divided by the total number of moles of cluster. These values were
extracted at the very beginning of the reaction where the graphs of
tof vs time were fairly linear. The samples for GC/MS analyses
were collected with an Ar-purged syringe, degassed with Ar-
bubbling, and stored in the dark in the freezer (-5 °C) until analysis.
High-Pressure Hydrogenations. The hydrogenation reactions
under high pressure were performed in a 200-mL Parr Instrument
autoclave (4001 model) equipped with a gas inlet-outlet valve and
a liquid sampling valve. Mechanical stirring provided agitation. In
this contribution, no heating was provided when high-pressure
experiments were performed. A 100-mL solution of THF (or other
desired solvents) containing 4 × 10-6 mol of [Pd4(dppm)4H2](BF4)2
(or other salts depending on the experiments), 0.004 mol of
substrate, and 0.004 mol of methylcyclohexane was placed inside
the reactor. The reactor was purged three times with H2 gas at the
desired pressure, while the stirring was activated. All the runs were
24 h.
homogeneous Pd catalysts indicates that the active species
all appear to be mononuclear,8 except for one material, a
species formulated as {Pd5(PPh)2}n. In this case, no structural
characterization is available, but this catalyst turns out to be
very efficient.8b To our knowledge, besides this material, the
title cluster and Pd2(dppm)3,9 there is no other polynuclear
palladium species that has been investigated for its homo-
geneous catalyzing hydrogenation properties. One wonders
what the effects of the presence of more than one metal atom
in the active catalysts are, with respect to cooperativity.
We now report the catalytic properties of the title cluster
toward the homogeneous hydrogenation of phenylacetylene,
diphenylethyne, and phenyl-1-propyne as a function of
temperature, pressure, solvents, cluster and substrate con-
centrations, and counterions. The mechanism involves the
cluster dissociation into active d9-d9 dimers.
Variable Concentration Hydrogenations. The hydrogenation
reactions using various concentrations of cluster (4 × 10-6, 10-5
,
Experimental Section
2 × 10-5, 6 × 10-5, 8 × 10-5, 2 × 10-4, and 10-4 M) and substrates
-
Materials. The title cluster as BF4-, Cl-, and BPh4 salts has
(4 × 10-3, 10-2, 2 × 10-2, 6 × 10-2, 8 × 10-2, 10-1, 2 × 10-1
,
been prepared according to literature procedures.3,6 The phenyl-
acetylene, diphenylethyne, 1-phenyl-1-propyne, cyclohexene, and
methylcyclohexane starting substrates and the corresponding hy-
drogenated products styrene, cis- and trans-stilbene, cis- and trans-
phenyl-1-propene, ethylbenzene, 1,2-diphenylethane, and propyl-
benzene used to calibrate the GC/MS instrument, were purchased
from Aldrich, and were used as received. The solvents THF
(Anachemia), acetonitrile (Fisher), acetone (Fisher), CH2Cl2 (ACP),
pyridine (Aldrich), and DMF (Aldrich) were purified according to
literature procedures.10 The cluster was kept under inert atmosphere
at all times, even in the solid state, for best results and reproduc-
ibility.
and 4 × 10-1 M) were performed at 20 °C and 600 psi of H2. The
procedure was the same as described above.
GC/MS Analyses. The GC/MS analyses were performed with
a Hewlett-Packard 5890 series II spectrometer coupled with a
selective mass detector HP 5971 series. The hydrogenated products
were analyzed by temperature-programmed gas chromatography
(10 °C/min) from 60 to 250 °C with a DB-5MS column. A 0.9
mL/min helium flow has been used. The instrument was calibrated
using authentic samples of the substrates and their hydrogenation
products.
NMR Experiments. Variable-temperature NMR spectra were
recorded on a Bruker WM 300 spectrometer (1H NMR: 300.15
MHz, 31P NMR: 121.497 MHz). The reference was the residual
nondeuterated solvent. The chemical shifts are reported with respect
to TMS (1H NMR) and H3PO4 (31P NMR).
UV-Visible Experiments. UV-visible spectra were recorded
on a Hewlett-Packard (HP 8452A) diode array spectrophotometer.
Space-Filling Model and Simulations. The space-filling model
shown in Figure 3 was generated using the commercially available
PC-model 7.0 (Serena software) which uses the MMX empirical
parameters, and using ORTEP 32 and POV-Ray 3.5. The former
software is used to compute the skeleton for Pd4, while ORTEP
and POV-Ray generate the space-filling drawing. For the PC-model
computations, no particular constraint on bond lengths or angles
was applied, but comparisons with known structures containing the
same Pd2(dppm)2 skeleton from the literature were made, to ensure
the validity of the results. Simulated curves of Figures 2 and 5
were obtained from the regression function of the commercially
available Sigma Plot 2001 (Version 7.0) software.
Variable-Temperature Hydrogenation. The hydrogenation
reactions at 1 atm of H2 as a function of temperature were performed
using two 250-mL round flasks connected to each other with a
cannula. The first one contains 100 mL of THF, and H2 bubbling
was allowed to pass through this first flask to minimize the effect
of evaporation with time. In these experiments, the level of solvent
in the reaction flask never changed. The second flask contained 50
mL of THF, 0.002 mol of substrates ([substrate] ) 0.04 M), and
0.002 mol of methylcyclohexane as internal standard ([methylcy-
clohexane] ) 0.04 M). The whole system was allowed to reach
the desired temperature and purged for 1 h prior to addition of 2 ×
10-6 mol of Pd4(dppm)4H2(BF4)2 ([Pd4] ) 4 × 10-5 M). The
turnover frequency (tof) is defined as the number of moles of
consumed starting alkyne (or alkene when it applies) per hour,
(8) See, for examples: (a) Tsuji, J. Palladium Reagents and Catalysts;
Wiley: New York, 1995. (b) Moiseev, I. I.; Vargaftic, M. N. New J.
Chem. 1998, 1217. (c) van Asselt, R.; Elsevier, C. J. J. Mol. Catal.
1991, 65, L13. (d) Tani, K.; Ono, N.; Okamoto, S.; Sato, F. J. Chem.
Soc., Chem. Commun. 1993, 386. (e) Tour, J. M.; Pendalwar, S. L.
Tetrahedron. Lett. 1990, 31, 4719. (f) Suzuki, N.; Tsukanaka, T.;
Nomoto, T.; Ayaguchi, Y.; Izawa, Y. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.
1983, 515. (g) Borriello, C.; Ferrara, M. L.; Orabona, I.; Panunzi, A.;
Ruffo, F. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 2000, 2545. (h) Pelagatti, P.;
Bacchi, A.; Carelli, M.; Costa, M.; Fochi, A.; Ghidini, P.; Leporati,
E.; Masi, M.; Pelizzi, C.; Pelizzi, G. J. Organomet. Chem. 1999, 583,
94.
(9) Stern and Maples examined the catalytic activity of this complex with
respect to homogeneous hydrogenation. Because the complex was
handled in air, the true nature of the catalyst may be unknown. Stern,
E.; Maples, P. K. J. Catal. 1972, 27, 120.
(10) (a) Perrin, D. D.; Armarego, W. L. F.; Perrin, D. R. Purifications of
Laboratory Chemicals; Pergamon Press: Oxford, 1966. (b) Gordon,
A. J.; Ford, R. A. The Chemist’s Companion, a Handbook of Practical
Data, Techniques and References; Wiley: New York, 1972; p 436.
Results and Discussion
Hydrogenation under Mild Conditions. The [Pd4(dppm)4-
(H)2](BF4)2 cluster catalyses the homogeneous hydrogenation
of phenylacetylene, diphenylethyne, and phenyl-1-propyne
at 20 °C and 1 atm of H2 in THF with tof’s 500, 200, and
500 h-1, respectively, to form the semi- (cis- and trans- when
it applies) and fully hydrogenated corresponding products
(the definition for tof is provided in the Experimental
Section). These values are good when compared with
literature data for other catalysts (Table 1).11-13 However,
the values still fall short when compared with the best known
Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 43, No. 2, 2004 791