A R T I C L E S
Terrier et al.
results of thermodynamic investigations with the structural
information provided by NMR studies, the exceptional electron-
withdrawing capability of the SO2CF3 group in carbanion
stabilization was convincingly demonstrated. However, of equal
importance perhaps was the discovery of a dominant solvent
dependence of the carbon acidity, which was in marked contrast
for the SO2CF3 group as compared with the well-recognized
situation for the NO2 group.18a Thus, going from water to Me2-
SO strongly decreases the acidity of R-nitro activated carbon
acids, in accord with the well-established nitronate structure of
the conjugate carbanions.3,14,19,20 In such species, negative charge
is predominantly delocalized onto the oxygens of the NO2 group,
resulting in loss of H-bonding as the H2O content of the medium
is decreased. On the other hand, the same solvent transfer
increases the acidity of R-SO2CF3 activated carbon acids.18a In
the series of benzyltriflones 1-6, it could be shown through
substituent effects in the phenyl ring that the negative charge
in the generated benzylic anions remains largely localized on
the exocyclic carbon center, even in the case of a trinitro
activation of the phenyl ring.18b Because of a predominance of
polarization effects, a situation first recognized in a study of
the ionization of dimethyl sulfone,21 Me2SO is thus rendered
especially favorable in stabilizing charge through dispersion,
thereby increasing the carbon acidity. A striking illustration of
the contrasting response of R-nitro and R-SO2CF3 activated
carbon acids to H2O-Me2SO transfer is the observation of
inversions in relative acidities of these two classes of com-
pounds, for example, nitromethane 7 is 1 order of magnitude
more acidic than trifluoromethanesulfonylmethane 8 in water
but it becomes 500-fold less acidic than 8 in pure Me2SO.18a
Such a clear reversal in the relative acidifying effects of the
NO2 and SO2CF3 groups within a family of structurally similar
carbon acids was unprecedented and revealed further that Me2-
SO is a solvent of choice in taking advantage of the mode of
stabilization of negative charge by the SO2CF3 group and
therefore of its acidifying potential.
Recent efforts have been directed toward development of
novel substituents that would be even more effective than the
SO2CF3 group in charge withdrawal, and these substituents have
been referred to as superacidifiers.4-6 In the present work, we
report on not only a structural (NMR) and thermodynamic study
but also a kinetic study (Marcus intrinsic barrier) of the
ionization of the two benzyltriflones 9 and 10 to give the
conjugate carbanions C-9 and C-10 in pure Me2SO solution
and H2O-Me2SO mixtures of different compositions (eq 1). In
these triflones, the effect of the exocyclic SO2CF3 group is
opposed to the effect of para substitution of the phenyl ring by
a -S(O)(dNSO2CF3)CF3 group or a SO2CF3 group, respec-
tively. As will be seen, our results will first emphasize the much
stronger electron-withdrawing capability of the former fragment,
not only with respect to a SO2CF3 group but also to a NO2
group. Estimates of the Hammett σp and σp- constants for S(O)-
(dNSO2CF3)CF3 could be obtained. Comparison of the data
obtained for 9 and 10 with those previously reported for the
ionization of the para-nitrobenzyltriflone 4 and two related
carbon acids, namely the phenylnitromethanes 11 and 12, will
allow us to delineate the charge-transfer mechanism contributing
to the stabilization of negative charge by the aforementioned
CF3 modified sulfonyl and sulfoximinyl groups. Of major
importance for this discussion has been the successful position-
ing of 9 and 10 on the Marcus intrinsic reactivity scale for
carbon acids.3,20,22 Such a ranking is in itself a significant result
since it has thus far proved to be very difficult to determine
accurately the intrinsic reactivity of R-sulfur substituted carbon
acids.17,23
(9) (a) Kondratenko, N. V.; Popov, V. I.; Radchenko, O. A.; Ignatev, N. V.;
Yagupol’skii L. M. Zh. Org. Khim. 1986, 22, 1716. (b) Yagupol’skii L.
M.; Popov, V. I.; Pavlenko, N. V.; Gavrilov, R. Y.; Orda, V. V. Zh. Org.
Khim. 1986, 22, 2169. (c) Yagupol’skii, L. M.; Ilchenko, A. Y.; Kon-
dratenko, N. B. Usp. Khim. 1974, 43, 64.
(10) Yagupol’skii, L. M. In Aromatic and Heterocyclic Compounds with
Fluorine-Containing Substituents; Naukova Dumka: Kiev, Ukraine, 1988.
(11) (a) Boiko, V. N.; Kirii, N. V.; Yagupol’skii L. M. J. Fluorine Chem. 1994,
67, 119. (b) Yagupol’skii, L. M.; Garlyanskajte, R. Yu; Kondratenko, N.
V. Synthesis 1992, 749. (c) Yagupol’skii, L. M. J. Fluorine Chem. 1987,
36, 1.
(12) (a) Millot, F.; Chatrousse, A. P.; Yagupol’skii, L. M.; Boiko, V. N.;
Shchupak, G. M.; Ignatev, N. V. J. Chem. Res., Synop. 1979, 272. (b)
Yagupol’skii, L. M.; Gogoman, I. V.; Shchupak, G. M.; Boiko, V. N. Zh.
Org. Chem. 1986, 22, 664.
(13) (a) Terrier, F.; Millot, F.; Morel, J. J. Org. Chem. 1976, 41, 3892. (b)
Terrier, F.; Millot, F. NouV. J. Chem. 1980, 4, 255. (c) Terrier, F.;
Chatrousse, A. P.; Kizilian, E.; Ignatev, N. V.; Yagupol’skii, L. M. Bull.
Soc. Chim. Fr. 1989, 627.
(14) (a) Bordwell, F. G.; Vanier, N. R.; Matthews, W. S.; Hendrickson, J. B.;
Skipper, P. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 97, 7160. (b) Hendrickson, J. B.;
Sternbach, D. D.; Bair K. W. Acc. Chem. Res. 1997, 10, 306.
(15) Koppel, I. A.; Burk, P.; Koppel, I. V.; Leito, I. V.; Sonoda, T.; Hishima,
M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 5114.
(16) Raabe, G.; Gais, H. J.; Fleischhauer, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 4622.
(17) Terrier, F.; Kizilian, E.; Goumont, R.; Faucher, N.; Wakselman, C. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 9496.
(18) (a) Goumont, R.; Magnier, E.; Kizilian, E.; Terrier, F. J. Org. Chem. 2003,
68, 6566. (b) Goumont, R.; Kizilian, E.; Buncel, E.; Terrier, F. Org. Biomol.
Chem. 2003, 1741.
(19) Bordwell, F. G. Acc. Chem. Res. 1988, 21, 456.
(20) (a) Bernasconi, C. F.; Kliner, D. A. V.; Mullin, A. S.; Ni, J. X. J. Org.
Chem. 1988, 53, 3342. (b) Bernasconi, C. F.; Wenzel, P. J. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1996, 118, 11446. (c) Bernasconi, C. F.; Hibdon, S. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1983, 105, 4343. (d) Bernasconi, C. F.; Ni, J. X. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1993, 115, 5060.
(21) (a) Bors, D. A.; Streitwieser, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 1397. (b)
Speers, P.; Laidig, K. E.; Streitwieser, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116,
9257.
(22) (a) Marcus, R. A. J. Phys. Chem. 1968, 72, 891. (b) Cohen, A. O.; Marcus,
R. A. J. Phys. Chem. 1968, 72, 4249. (c) Guthrie, J. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1997, 119, 1151. (d) Guthrie, J. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 12878.
9
5564 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 127, NO. 15, 2005