cis-fused octahydronaphthalene core unit of integramycin via
an IMDA reaction of trienone 24. We also present our
observations of the dependence of the cis vs trans selectivity
of IMDA reactions of 1,7,9-decatrien-3-ones on the stereo-
chemistry of the dienophilic double bond.
Scheme 3. Synthesis and IMDA Reaction of Triene 12
Our synthetic strategy is predicated on the expectation that
cis-fused octahydronaphthalenone 5 (Scheme 2) should be
Scheme 2. IMDA Transition State Analysis
a viable precursor to the targeted integramycin ring sys-
tem, 3. Further, we anticipated that intermediate 5 could be
accessed by the IMDA reaction of trienone 4 (Scheme 2).
Previous studies in this laboratory have implicated the
intervention of boatlike transition states in the IMDA
reactions of 1,7,9-decatrien-3-ones.5 Moreover, those studies
indicated that in the absence of overriding nonbonded
interactions, boatlike transition states should predominate in
the IMDA reactions of these substrates.4,5 We reasoned,
therefore, that the IMDA reaction of a trieneone 4, containing
the protected C(10)-OH group of integramycin, would
proceed through boatlike transition state A to give cis-decalin
5 (Scheme 2). The alternative chairlike transition state B
would lead to cis-decalin 6, with the incorrect stereochemistry
for integramycin.
We elected to synthesize racemic triene 12 to test this
hypothesis (Scheme 3). This synthesis began with the
thallium carbonate6 promoted Suzuki coupling7 of known
vinylboronic acid 78 and vinyl iodide 89 to give diene 9 in
60% yield. Treatment of 9 with KHMDS in THF at -78 °C
followed by addition of Davis’ oxaziridine (trans-2-(phen-
ylsulfonyl)-3-phenyloxzairidine)10,11 provided the R-hydroxy
methyl ester 10 in 73% yield. Treatment of the derived
TBDPS ether with dimethyl lithiomethylphosphonate gave
â-keto phosphonate 11 in 87% yield over two steps.
Subjection of 11 to a Horner-Wadsworth-Emmons olefi-
nation12 with ethyl glyoxylate, followed by addition of
2-mercaptopyridine to isomerize any (Z)-olefin formed,5
resulted in the generation and in situ cyclization of 12 to an
inseparable ca. 4:1 mixture of trans-fused bicycles 13 and
14. The isomeric cycloadducts were separated after depro-
tection of the PMB ethers. The stereochemistry of the two
adducts was then assigned on the basis of NOE and coupling
constant analysis (see Supporting Information).
The production of trans-fused cycloadducts 13 and 14 was
unexpected given the literature precedent for IMDA reactions
of similar substrates.4 To probe the possibility that the
dienophilic carboethoxy group might be responsible for the
trans selectivity, we examined the IMDA reaction of 15 with
a monoactivated dienophile.
Subjection of 11 to the HWE reaction12 with R-benzyloxy
acetaldehyde produced triene 15 in 82% yield (Scheme 4).
Treatment of 15 with 1.5 equiv of MeAlCl2 at -78 °C then
provided trans-fused cycloadduct 16 in 72% yield, along with
a small amount of another isomer that could not be purified
or identified. The stereochemistry of 16 was assigned by 1H
NOE and coupling constant analysis after deprotection of
the PMB ether (see Supporting Information).
At this point, we became concerned that the bulky C(10)-
OTBDPS group might be responsible for the exclusive
production of trans-fused products in the IMDA reaction.
To determine the selectivity of an IMDA substrate lacking
(5) Coe, J. W.; Roush, W. R. J. Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 915.
(6) Hoshino, Y.; Miyaura, N.; Suzuki, A. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1988,
61, 3008.
(7) Miyaura, N.; Suzuki, A. Chem. ReV. 1995, 95, 2457.
(8) Roush, W. R.; Warmus, J. S.; Works, A. B. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993,
34, 4427.
(9) Esumi, T.; Okamoto, N.; Hatekeyama, S. Chem. Commun. 2002,
3042.
(10) Davis, F. A.; Vishwakarma, L. C.; Billmers, J. M. J. Org. Chem.
1984, 49, 3241.
(11) Davis, F. A.; Stringer, O. D. J. Org. Chem. 1982, 47, 1744.
(12) Blanchette, M. A.; Choy, W.; Davis, J. T.; Essenfeld, A. P.;
Masamune, S.; Roush, W. R.; Sakai, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1984, 25, 2183-
2186.
1356
Org. Lett., Vol. 7, No. 7, 2005