did not catalyze ring closure in these media. We tried to
extend this methodology to amides in the hope of producing
either oxazoles or indolones, but amides failed to give any
ring-closure products under the same conditions we used to
prepare fused imidazoles.
Sodium hydride was our base of choice, but alkoxides and
Cs2CO3 also promoted efficient ring closure in aprotic
solvents. Reaction rates with other bases were significantly
slower, but some ring closure was apparent with most of
the bases we explored (Table 2). In particular, KOAc (Table
aryl halides.6 The amidines and guanidines described here
react under similar conditions, though no special copper
ligands are required.
In conclusion, we have identified a general method for
the preparation of fused imidazole systems. It allows for
assembly of the ring system at the ring fusion, and the cores
can be prepared in one step from an amidine or a guanidine
and an A-ring precursor. The reaction works best on electron-
deficient ring systems, but it can be performed on more
electron-rich systems at elevated temperatures. Compared to
previous methods, it offers the advantages of easily obtained
reagents, lower temperatures, and relatively mild conditions
for the preparation of fused imidazoles. It also increases the
diversity of available starting materials, since many o-
bromoanilines are commercially available or can be prepared
in one step from the precursor anilines and aniline deriva-
tives. In most cases, the ring closure proceeds cleanly, and
pure products are obtained upon routine aqueous workup.
This is an important advantage, since many purines are
poorly soluble in common organic solvents and can be
difficult to purify. The method has proven useful for the
preparation of potent DPPIV inhibitors, and it will make the
preparation of new purines and other fused imidazole systems
simpler than is possible using previous methods.7
Table 2. Percent Ring Closure for Table 1, Entry 7 with
Various Basesa
entry
base
% product entry
base
% product
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
NaH
>99
>99
>99
>99
>99
52
8
9
K2CO3
Na2CO3
Et3N
i-Pr2EtN
NaHCO3
imidazole
none
37
35
24
18
12
<1
<1
t-BuOK
NaOEt
NaOMe
Cs2CO3
KOAc
10
11
12
13
14
K3PO4
39
a Reactions were run in dioxane at 100 °C at 0.12 M for 30 min with 5
mol % of CuI and 5 equiv of base. Each reaction was then checked by
reversed-phase HPLC, and the ratio of product to starting material was
determined by comparison with a standard curve.
Acknowledgment. We dedicate this work to Professor
Clayton Heathcock in recognition of his many contributions
to the field of organic chemistry and in honor of his academic
retirement. We also thank the R4MC and R47R scientists
for their support of this work.
2, entry 6) gave the expected product, opening the possibility
of performing the ring closure under very mild conditions
with substrates intolerant of strong bases. Dioxane, THF,
DMF, and DMSO all were suitable solvents.
The ring-closure mechanism likely follows the Cu-assisted
aromatic nucleophilic substitution pathways outlined by
Lindley.5 Copper(I) is essential for the ring closure, but
copper(I) iodide alone did not give the reaction. In recent
years, Buchwald and co-workers have explored the copper-
catalyzed coupling of different nitrogen functionalities with
Supporting Information Available: Experimental pro-
cedures and characterization data for all new compounds.
This material is available free of charge via the Internet at
OL0504751
(6) (a) Klapars, A.; Huang, X.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002,
124, 7421. (b) Antilla, J. C.; Baskin, J. M.; Barder, T. E.; Buchwald, S. L.
J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 5578.
(7) A series of DPPIV inhibitors prepared using this methodology will
be reported soon.
(5) Lindley, J. Tetrahedron 1984, 40, 1433.
Org. Lett., Vol. 7, No. 9, 2005
1835