2544 Organometallics, Vol. 24, No. 10, 2005
Notes
The intermediate vinylidene compound fac-[Mn(Cd
C(H)CO2Me)(CO)3(dppm)]BF4 (5) (see Scheme 2), re-
sulting from protonation of the alkynyl ligand, was not
observed when performing the reaction at room tem-
perature. However, the addition of HBF4 at 200 K to a
NMR sample of 4 instantaneously changes the color of
the solution from yellow to red and allows spectroscopic
detection of the vinylidene complex 5. Thus the 1H NMR
spectrum showed the presence of the CdCH- proton
as a new signal at 5.9 ppm, whereas the 31P{1H} NMR
spectrum gave a singlet signal at 11.5 ppm, showing
that phosphorus atoms remain equivalent. Below 243
K, 5 is the unique species detected, and above this
temperature formation of 4 took place readily and
quantitatively. Although a structure for 5 consisting of
the η2-alkyne tautomer of the proposed vinylidene
derivative cannot be totally excluded, it seems to be
unlikely on the basis of similar results previously
reported,13 as well us considering the absence of P-H
coupling in the CdCH- proton resonance.
Migratory insertion is an important reaction pathway
for transition metal vinylidene complexes, with several
examples being known of insertion of vinylidene ligands
into metal-carbon σ-bonds,8 and also into metal-
nitrogen,9 metal-oxygen,10 and metal-halide bonds.11
However, although a plethora of vinylidene complexes
containing phosphines as ancillary ligands have been
described, with some of them displaying important
catalytic applications,12 only a few examples of vi-
nylidene insertion into a metal-phosphorus bond have
been reported.13 This phosphorus-carbon bond forming
process is of great interest, as it represents a potential
catalyst deactivation pathway for vinylidene complex-
catalyzed organic transformations. It must be noted that
related insertion of allenylidene14 and alkyne15 ligands
into metal-phoshorus bond has been described recently.
There is no doubt that oxygen coordination is a
driving force in the insertion reaction and product
stabilization; thus insertion proceeds giving exclusively
the Z alkenyl isomer, in which coordination through the
carboxylate fragment is allowed. In fact, when trying
to perform the vinylidene formation and subsequent
vinylphosphonium stabilization by protonation reaction
of σ-alkynyl complexes lacking carboxylate substituents
as in fac-[Mn(CtCPh)(CO)3(dppm)], only decomposition
products were observed.
alkyne into a C-H bond, formation of a σ-alkynyl
complex by intramolecular alkyne deprotonation, and
insertion of a vinylidene ligand into a metal-phospho-
rus bond.
Experimental Section
General Remarks. All reactions and manipulations were
performed under a atmosphere of dry nitrogen by using
standard Schlenk techniques. Solvents were distilled over
appropriate drying agents under dry nitrogen prior to use.
Compound [Mn(CO)4{(PPh2)2CH}] (1) was prepared as de-
scribed elsewhere.16
Synthesis of 2 and 3. A solution containing 1 (0.20 g, 0.364
mmol) and methyl propiolate (162 µL, 1.82 mmol) in toluene
(20 mL) was stirred at reflux temperature for 5 h. The color
changed from yellow to red. The solvent was then evaporated
to dryness and the remaining solid chromatographed through
an alumina column (activity degree III). Elution with CH2Cl2/
hexane (1:1) allowed the separation of compound 2 (0.069 g,
30%) from the first band (yellow) and compound 3 (0.055 g,
25%) from the second band (yellow). 2: Anal. (%) Calcd for
C33H25MnO6P2: C 62.47, H 3.97. Found: C 62.13, H 4.12. IR
1
(CH2Cl2): ν 2076 (s), 1995 (vs), 1967 (m) cm-1 (CO). H NMR
(300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.83-7.46 (21H, m), 4.84 (1H, d, 3JHH
)
14), 3.60 (3H, s). 31P{1H} NMR (121.5 MHz, CDCl3): δ 2.8 (br).
3: Anal. (%) Calcd for C32H25MnO5P2: C 63.38, H 4.16.
Found: C 63.56, H 4.28. IR (CH2Cl2): ν 2093 (w) cm-1 (CtC),
2016 (vs), 1950 (s), 1935 (s) cm-1 (CO). 1H NMR (300 MHz,
CDCl3): δ 7.71-7.20 (20H, m), 4.84 (1H, m), 4.37 (1H, m), 3.22
(3H, s). 31P{1H} NMR (121.5 MHz, CDCl3): δ 21.6 (br).
Synthesis of 4. To a solution of 3 (0.05 g, 0.082 mmol) in
10 mL of CH2Cl2 was added tetrafluoroboric acid/diethyl ether
complex (54%, 15 µL, 0.109 mmol) with stirring. The solvent
was then evaporated, and the oil obtained was washed with
diethyl ether (3 × 5 mL). Recrystallization in CH2Cl2/hexane
provided 4 as yellow crystals; yield 0.057 g (90%). Anal. (%)
Calcd for C32BF4H26MnO5P2: C 55.36, H 3.77. Found: C 55.54,
H 3.65. IR (CH2Cl2): ν 2033 (vs), 1966 (s), 1918(s) cm-1 (CO).
1H NMR (300 MHz, CD2Cl2): δ 7.99-7.40 (20H, m), 6.45 (1H,
3
4
2
dd, JPH ) 25, JPH ) 7, CdCH), 5.40 (1H, ddd, JPH ) 16,
2JPH ) 10, JHH ) 5, CH2), 3.90 (1H, td, JPH ) 15, JHH ) 5,
2
2
2
CH2), 3.59 (3H, s, CO2CH3). 31P{1H} NMR (121.5 MHz,
2
2
CDCl3): δ 63.5 (d, JPP ) 34, MnPPh2), 26.4 (d, JPP ) 34,
PPh2).
NMR Detection of 5. To a NMR sample of 3 (0.02 g, 0.033
mmol) in CD2Cl2 was added tetrafluoroboric acid/diethyl ether
complex (54%, 10 µL, 0.109 mmol) at 200 K. Keeping a low
temperature, NMR experiments were performed. 1H NMR (400
MHz, CD2Cl2): δ 7.50 (20H, br), 5.90 (1H, br, CdC(H)(CO2-
Me)), 4.85 (2H, m, P2CH2), 3.18 (3H, br, CO2CH3). 31P{1H}
NMR (161.99 MHz, CD2Cl2): δ 11.48 (s, (PPh2)2).
In conclusion, up to three rare reaction pathways are
observed in the treatment of the diphosphinomethanide
complex 1 with methyl propiolate: insertion of the
Crystallography. Diffraction data were collected on an
Enraf-Nonius KappaCCD diffractometer at 100 K. The struc-
tures were solved by direct methods and refined using full-
matrix least-squares on F2 with all non-hydrogen atoms
anisotropically refined. Crystal data for 3 (C32H25MnO5P2): Mr
) 604.4, triclinic, space group P1h, a ) 9.50925(1) Å, b )
17.3418(2) Å, c ) 18.1765(2) Å, R ) 69.7090(5)°, â ) 88.5567-
(5)°, γ ) 89.6242(5)°, V ) 2810.52(5) Å3, Z ) 4, Fcalcd ) 1.433
g/cm-3, F(000) ) 1248, Mo KR radiation (λ ) 0.71073 Å)R,
crystal dimensions 0.36 × 0.24 × 0.20 mm. For 9477 reflections
with [I > 2σI] R indices: R1 ) 0.0320 and wR2 ) 0.0939. For
all 11005 unique reflections R indices: R1 ) 0.0394 and wR2
(8) (a) Bianchini, C.; Peruzzini, M.; Zanobini, F.; Frediani, P.;
Albinati, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 5453. (b) Proulx, G.;
Bergman, R. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 9802. (c) Wiedemann,
R.; Steiner, P.; Scha¨fer, M.; Werner, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115,
9864. (d) Beckhaus, R.; Sang, J.; Trixie, W.; Ganter, B. Organometallics
1996, 15, 1176. (e) Kerstin, I.; Weberndo¨rfer, B.; Werner, H. Organo-
metallics 2000, 19, 3145.
(9) Chevrier, B.; Weiss, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 2899.
(10) Daniel, T.; Mahr, N.; Braun, T.; Werner, H. Organometallics
1993, 12, 1475.
(11) O’Connor, J. M.; Hiibner, K.; Merwin, R.; Pu, L. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1995, 117, 8861.
(12) Bruneau, C.; Dixneuf, P. H. Acc. Chem. Res. 1999, 32, 311.
(13) (a) Bianchini, C.; Meli, A.; Peruzzini, M.; Zanobini; F.; Zanello,
P. Organometallics 1990, 9, 241. (b) Bianchini, C.; Meli, A.; Peruzzini,
M.; Zanobini, F.; Bruneau, C.; Dixneuf, P. H. Organometallics 1990,
9, 1155. (c) Bianchini, C.; Innocenti, P.; Meli, A.; Peruzzini, M.;
Zanobini, F.; Zanello, P. Organometallics 1990, 9, 2514.
(14) Werner; H.; Wiedemann, R.; Laubender, M.; Windmu¨ller, B.;
Steiner, P.; Gevert, O.; Wolf, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 6966.
(15) (a) Chin, C. S.; Park, Y.; Kim, J.; Lee, B. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1995, 1495. (b) Allen, A.; Lin, W. Organometallics 1999, 18,
2922. (c) Tanase, T.; Begun, R. A. Organometallics 2001, 20, 106.
(16) Ruiz, J.; Riera, V.; Vivanco, M.; Garc´ıa-Granda, S.; Garc´ıa-
Ferna´ndez, A. Organometallics 1992, 11, 4077.