Marcantoni et al.
The mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature and
was stirred for 3 h at this temperature. The reaction was then
quenched with an aqueous sodium hydroxide solution (1 M,
40 mL), and the mixture was stirred until both layers were
clear. The mixture was extracted with diethyl ether (5 × 80
mL), and the organic phase was washed with water (2 × 20
mL) and brine (20 mL), dried over sodium sulfate, and
concentrated in vacuo. Flash chromatography (3.5:6.5 hexanes/
ethyl acetate) produced primary alcohol 10 (0.28 g, 90% yield)
along with the recovered chiral auxiliary. The product was
characterized by IR and 1H NMR: IR (thin film) ν´ ) 3400,
2957, 1641, 1219 cm-1; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ ) 7.20-
7.11 (m, 2H), 7.04-6.94 (m, 2H), 3.55 (dt, J ) 6.85 and 6.32
Hz, 2H), 2.88 (bs, OH, 1H), 2.50-2.57 (m, 1H), 1.64-1.72 (m,
2H), 1.20 (d, J ) 7.02 Hz, 3H). Elemental analysis calcd (%)
for C10H13FO (168.21): C, 71.40; H, 7.79. Found C, 71.45; H,
7.27.
(3R)-3-(p-Fluorophenyl)butyl 4-Methyl-1-benzenesulfon-
ate (11). A solution of alcohol 10 (0.154 g, 0.916 mmol) in
dichloromethane (2 mL) was treated with tosyl chloride (0.22
g, 1.16 mmol) and pyridine (97 µL, 1.21 mmol) and stirred at
room temperature for 5 h. The reaction mixture was then
diluted with diethyl ether (100 mL) and washed with a 5%
aqueous hydrochloride solution (3 × 25 mL). The organic phase
was washed with a saturated aqueous sodium hydrogen
carbonate solution (2 × 20 mL) and brine (2 × 15 mL), dried
over sodium sulfate, and concentrated in vacuo. Flash chro-
matography (9:1 hexanes/ethyl acetate) produced 11 as a pale
yellow oil (0.26 g, 85% yield). The product was characterized
by GC-MS: MS (70 eV, EI) m/z (%) 322 (M+, 19), 150 (63),
135 (100), 123 (51), 109 (31), 91 (47), 103 (37), 77 (11), 65 (21).
(3R)-1-D1-3-(p-Fluorophenyl)butane (1FR). An ether so-
lution (5 mL) of the tosylate 11 (0.224 g, 0.694 mmol) was
added to a suspension of lithium aluminum deuteride (33.2
mg, 0.79 mmol) in ether (7 mL) at 0 °C with an ice bath. The
reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 10 min
and then refluxed for 5 h. After hydrolysis by successive
addition of (i) water (0.03 mL), (ii) 15% aqueous sodium
hydroxide solution (0.03 mL), and (iii) water (0.09 mL), the
precipitate formed was eventually filtered off. The filtrate (180
mL) was washed with a saturated aqueous sodium hydrogen
carbonate solution (2 × 25 mL) and brine (2 × 25 mL) and
dried over magnesium sulfate. The solvent was removed in
vacuo. Flash chromatography on a silica gel column (1:1
diethyl ether/petroleum ether) produced the target product,
1FR (57 mg, 73% yield). The product was characterized by GC-
MS: MS (70 eV, EI) m/z (%) 153 (M+, 23), 123 (100), 109 (27),
103 (39), 96 (9), 77 (11), 51 (4).
Radiolytic Procedure. Methane, n-butane, fluorobenzene,
oxygen, and triethylamine were commercially available high-
purity compounds used without further purification. The
gaseous mixtures were prepared by conventional procedures
with the use of a greaseless vacuum line. Two sets of experi-
ments were carried out. In the first series, the starting chiral
arene, 1FR, the thermal radical scavenger, O2, and the base,
(C2H5)3N (proton affinity (PA) ) 234.7 kcal mol-1),36 were
introduced into carefully outgassed 130 mL Pyrex bulbs, each
equipped with a break-seal tip. The bulbs were filled with CH4
(60 or 750 Torr), cooled to liquid-nitrogen temperature, and
sealed off. In the second set of experiments, the gaseous
mixtures were prepared containing traces of fluorobenzene 16,
O2, (C2H5)3N, and butane (60 or 750 Torr), cooled to liquid-
nitrogen temperature, and sealed off. The gaseous mixtures
were submitted to irradiation at a constant temperature (40-
100 °C) in a 60Co γ-source (dose 2 × 104 Gy, dose rate 1 × 103
Gy h-1, determined with a neopentane dosimeter). Control
experiments, carried out at doses ranging from 1 × 104 to 1 ×
105 Gy, showed that the relative yields of products are largely
independent of the dose. The radiolytic products were analyzed
by GLC-MS. The following chiral columns were used: (i) a 25
m long, i.d. 0.25 mm i.d., df ) 0.25 µm MEGADEX 5 column
operated at 40 < T < 170 °C, 4 °C min-1; (ii) a 25 m long, 0.25
i.d., df ) 0.25 µm CP-Chirasil-DEX CB column operated at 40
< T < 170 °C, 4 °C min-1; and (iii) a 25 m long, 0.25 i.d., df )
0.25 µm Dimethylpentyl â-CDX (PS 086) column operated at
40 < T < 170 °C, 4 °C min-1. The yields of the radiolytic
products were determined from the areas of the corresponding
eluted peaks using an internal standard (acetophenone) and
individual calibration factors to correct for the detector re-
sponse. Control experiments were performed to rule out the
occurrence of thermal fragmentation, isomerization, and ra-
cemization of the starting arene as well as of their isomeric
products within the temperature range investigated.
The D-content and location in the radiolytic products from
the first set of experiments were determined by GLC-MS; the
mass analyzer was set in the selected ion mode (SIM). The
ion fragments at m/z 123 ([M - C2H4D]+), 124 ([M - C2H5]+),
and 153 ([M]•+) were monitored to analyze all of the GLC-
separated isomers of 1F ()M). Fluorobenzene 16, obtained
R
from 1FR, was analyzed by monitoring its parent ion at m/z
96.
Computational Details. Quantum-chemical ab initio cal-
culations were performed using the Unix version of the
Gaussian 98 program.37 The geometries of the investigated
species have been optimized, by analytical-gradient techniques,
at the HF/6-31+G** level of theory, and the located critical
points have been unambiguously characterized as true minima
on the potential energy surface by computing, at the same
computational level, the corresponding analytical vibrational
frequencies. The latter values were used to calculate the zero-
point vibrational energies (ZPE).
Results
Radiolytic Experiments. Table 1 shows the composi-
tion of the irradiated systems as well as the identity and
the yields (Yi) of the major products, i.e., (()-1-D1-3-(m-
fluorophenyl)butane (12), (()-1-D1-2-(m-fluorophenyl)-
butane (13), (()-1-D1-3-(o-fluorophenyl)butane (14), (()-
1-D1-2-(o-fluorophenyl)butane (15), and fluorobenzene
+
(16), obtained from gas-phase CnH5 (n ) 1 or 2) proto-
nation of 1FR in the presence of trace amounts of (C2H5)3N
(0.1 Torr) (Scheme 3). The table does not include other
minor products, i.e., isomeric (()-1-D1-3-(tolyl)butanes,
which arise from the well-known addition to the methane
bulk gas of para sec-butylphenyl cations, generated by
CnH5 (n ) 1 or 2)-induced defluorination of 1F
.
R
It
+
38
should be noted that, despite a specific search, no
appreciable amounts of (S)-1-D1-3-(p-fluorophenyl)butane
or (S)-1-D1-2-(p-fluorophenyl)butane were detected among
the products.
The numbers in the table represent average values
obtained from several separate irradiations carried out
under the same experimental conditions, and their
reproducibility is expressed by the uncertainty level
(37) Frish, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.;
Robb, M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Montgomery, J. A.;
Stratman, R. E., Jr.; Burant, J. C.; Dapprich, S.; Millam, J. M.; Daniels,
A. D.; Kudin, K. N.; Strain, M. C.; Farkas, O.; Tomasi, J.; Barone, V.;
Cossi, M.; Cammi, R.; Mennucci, B.; Pomelli, C.; Adamo, C.; Clifford,
S.; Ochterski, J.; Petersson, G. A.; Ayala, P. Y.; Cui, Q.; Morokuma,
K.; Malik, D. K.; Rabuck, A. D.; Raghavachari, K.; Foresman, J. B.;
Cioslowski, J.; Ortiz, J. V.; Raboul, A. G.; Stefaniv, B. B.; Liu, G.;
Liashenko, A.; Piskorz, P.; Nanayakkara, I.; Gonzales, C.; Challacombe,
M.; Gill, P. M. W.; Johnson, B.; Chen, W.; Wong, M. W.; Andres, J. L.;
Gonzales, C.; Head-Gordon, M.; Replogle, E. S.; Pople, J. A. Gaussian
98, revision A7; Gaussian, Inc.: Pittsburgh, PA, 1998.
(36) National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)-USA,
(38) Speranza, M.; Cacace, F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 3051.
4136 J. Org. Chem., Vol. 70, No. 10, 2005