R. V. Cube et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 15 (2005) 2389–2393
2393
OH
OH
O
HO
O
OH
O
O
OH
OH
HO
O
O
O
O
Cl
iii
ii
i
22
23
15
O
iv
O
O
O
OH
O
v
24
16
Scheme 2. Reagents and conditions: (i) 3-chloropropionic acid, triflic acid, 80 °C, 60%; (ii) 2.0 N sodium hydroxide, 87%; (iii) 20, K2CO3, acetone,
40 °C, 42%; (iv) 10% Pd/C, ethyl acetate, H2, 1 atm, 12 h, 100%; (v) 20, K2CO3, acetone, 40 °C, 46%.
promiscuous G-protein (Ga16). Receptor activity was
detected by changes in [Ca2+], measured using the
fluorescent, Ca2+ sensitive dye fura-2. For further infor-
mation, see: Varney, M. A.; Cosford, N. D.; Jachec, C.;
Rao, S. P.; Sacaan, A.; Lin, F. F.; Bleicher, L.; Santori, E.
M.; Flor, P. J.; Allgeier, H.; Gasparini, F.; Kuhn, R.;
Hess, S. D.; Velicelebi, G.; Johnson, E. C. J. Pharmacol.
Exp. Ther. 1999, 290, 170.
References and notes
1. Conn, P. J.; Pin, J. P. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol.
1997, 37, 205.
2. Schoepp, D. D.; Jane, D. E.; Monn, J. A. Neuropharma-
cology 1999, 38, 1431.
3. Lam, A. G.; Soriano, M. A.; Monn, J. A.; Schoepp, D. D.;
Lodge, D.; McCulloch, J. Neurosci. Lett. 1998, 254, 121.
4. Kingston, A. E.; OÕNeill, M. J.; Lam, A.; Bales, K. R.;
Monn, J. A.; Schoepp, D. D. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1999, 377,
155.
5. Helton, D. R.; Tizzano, J. P.; Monn, J. A.; Schoepp, D.
D.; Kallman, M. J. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1998, 284,
651.
16. Pinkerton, A. B.; Vernier, J.-M.; Schaffahuser, H.; Rowe,
B. A.; Campbell, U. C.; Rodriguez, D. E.; Lorrain, D. S.;
Baccei, C. S.; Daggett, L. P.; Bristow, L. J. J. Med. Chem.
2004, 47, 4595.
17. The effect of these compounds were confirmed and
further characterized in the [35S]-GTPcS binding assay.
First, an EC10 (1.0 lM) of glutamate was added to the cell
line followed immediately by the test compound at varying
concentrations. The response was then compared to a
response using a saturating amount of glutamate (1 mM)
to give both an EC50 and a percent potentiation (the
response normalized to the maximum response of gluta-
mate alone). The same experiment was carried out in the
absence of glutamate to test if the compound was truly a
positive allosteric modulator. Non-specific binding was
determined by addition of 10 lM unlabeled GTPcS. See
Ref. 14 for a detailed description of this assay.
18. Pinkerton, A. B.; Cube, R. V.; Hutchinson, J. H.; Rowe,
B. A.; Schaffhauser, H.; Zhao, X.; Daggett, L. P.; Vernier,
J.-M. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2004, 14, 5329.
19. Pinkerton, A. B.; Cube, R. V.; Hutchinson, J. H.; James,
Joyce J. K.; Gardner, M. F.; Schaffhauser, H.; Rowe, B.
A.; Daggett, L. P.; Vernier, J.-M. Bioorg. Med. Chem.
Lett. 2004, 14, 5867.
20. Proton NMR of compound 8 is consistent with proposed
structure. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) d 13.03 (s, 1H),
7.63–7.61 (d, 1H), 7.07–7.05 (d, 1H), 6.46–6.40 (m, 3H),
4.16–4.12 (m, 2H), 4.06–4.00 (m, 4H), 2.92–2.89 (m, 2H),
2.79–2.78 (d, 2H), 2.68–2.64 (m, 2H), 2.30–2.28 (m, 1H),
2.13 (s, 3H), 2.07–2.00 (m, 4H), 1.44–1.41 (t, 3H), 1.03–1.02
(d, 6H). HRMS 473.2546 (M+), 495.2337 (M++Na). HPLC–
MS showed greater than 95% purity for compound 8.
Strong hydrogen bonding between the phenol proton and
the ketone greatly downshifts the phenol proton singlet to
13 ppm, a diagnostic signal in the proton NMR for all of
the analogs described herein. This singlet is observed in
compound 8. Therefore, we conclude that ethylation
occurs regioselectively as specified.
6. Chavez-Noriega, L. E.; Schaffhauser, H.; Campbell, U. C.
Curr. DrugTargets 2002, 1, 261.
7. Monn, J. A.; Valli, M. J.; Massey, S. M.; Wright, R. A.;
Salhoff, C. R.; Johnson, B. G.; Howe, T.; Alt, C. A.;
Rhodes, G. A.; Robey, R. L.; Griffey, K. R.; Tizzano, J.
P.; Kallman, M. J.; Helton, D. R.; Schoepp, D. D. J. Med.
Chem. 1997, 40, 528.
8. Monn, J. A.; Valli, M. J.; Massey, S. M.; Hansen, M. M.;
Kress, T. J.; Wepsiec, J. P.; Harkness, A. R.; Grutsch, J.
L., Jr.; Wright, R. A.; Johnson, B. G.; Andis, S. L.;
Kingston, A.; Tomlinson, R.; Lewis, R.; Griffey, K. R.;
Tizzano, J. P.; Schoepp, D. D. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42,
1027.
9. Nakazato, A.; Kumagai, T.; Sakagami, K.; Yoshikawa,
R.; Suzuki, Y.; Chaki, S.; Ito, H.; Taguchi, T.; Nakanishi,
S.; Okuyama, S. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 4893.
10. Levine, L.; Gaydos, B.; Sheehan, D.; Goddarg, A. W.;
Feighner, J.; Potter, W. Z.; Schoepp, D. D. Neurophar-
macology 2002, 43, 294.
11. (a) Grillon, C.; Cordova, J.; Levine, L. R.; Morgan, C. A.,
III. Psychopharmacology 2003, 168, 446; (b) Schoepp, D.
D.; Wright, R. A.; Levine, L. R.; Gaydos, B.; Potter, W.
Z. Stress 2003, 6, 189.
12. Knoflach, F.; Mutel, V.; Jolidon, S.; Kew, J. N. C.;
Malherbe, P.; Viera, E.; Wichmann, J.; Kemp, J. A. Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2001, 98, 13402.
13. Johnson, M. P.; Baez, M.; Jagdmann, G. E., Jr.; Britton,
T. C.; Large, T. H.; Callagaro, D. O.; Tizzano, J. P.;
Monn, J. A.; Schoepp, D. D. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46,
3189.
14. Schaffhauser, H.; Rowe, B. A.; Morales, Chavez-Noriega
L. E.; Yin, R.; Jachec, C.; Rao, S. P.; Bain, G.; Pinkerton,
A. B.; Vernier, J.-M.; Bristow, L. J.; Varney, M. A.;
Daggett, L. P. Mol. Pharmacol. 2003, 64, 798.
15. Screening of compounds was carried out using a Ca2+ flux
functional (FLIPR384) assay using a stable cell line co-
expressing the human mGlu2 receptors coupled to a
21. All final compounds displayed spectral data (1H NMR,
HPLC–MS) consistent with the assigned structure (purity
>95%).
22. Koch, K.; Biggers, M. S. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59,
1216.