A R T I C L E S
Friedrich et al.
the field of theoretical chemistry.4 A recent study by Radom
assessed the quality of high level computational methods for
the determination of activation energies and reaction enthalpies
of the parent butenyl radical.4b More complex systems were not
investigated, and thus issues of stereoselectivity cannot be
addressed.
In the field of metal mediated radical chemistry, only very
few examples of 3-exo cyclizations have been observed.5 As
early as 1966, Barton described a single example of a chro-
mium(II) mediated radical addition to an enone in a steroid
derivative.5a Another isolated report by Lange concerned a low
yielding samarium diiodide mediated fragmentation cyclization
sequence involving an acrylate.5b Similar but general and high
yielding methodology was explored by Guibe´ in the same year
in samarium diiodide mediated cyclizations of δ-halo-R,â-
unsaturated esters.5c A radical mechanism was postulated, and
surprisingly it was proposed that opening of the intermediate
ester substituted cyclopropylcarbinyl radical was thermodynami-
cally favored. A 3-exo cyclization of similar iodides mediated
by zinc dust has been described very recently.5d
of this reaction has been reported independently by Ferna´ndez-
Mateos.8j
Despite their preparative usefulness, the overall mechanistic
picture of these reactions, including our own, has remained
unclear, and the factors influencing chemo- and stereoselectivity
are still unknown. The essential issue of catalyst control of
selectivity could therefore not be rationally addressed so far.
Of course, computational chemistry has become a unique and
highly useful tool for studying reaction mechanisms with the
emergence of powerful computers and sophisticated ab initio
methods. However, high level wave function-based ab initio
methods are still restricted to relatively small molecules. The
titanocene containing intermediates and transition structures are
too complex to be studied by these procedures. We therefore
decided to use density functional theory (DFT) first principle
methods in this study. To establish their accuracy for the
problems discussed here, they were scaled against the pertinent
cases of titanocene dichloride, the parent butenyl radical
cyclization, and the homolytic bond dissociation energies of the
intermediates studied here. These calibration studies revealed
that the DFT methods are highly reliable tools for our purposes.
The computational studies delivered the structures and
energies of all relevant transition structures and intermediates
composing a complete mechanistic picture. In particular, it was
established in contradiction to the proposal by Guibe´5c and in
agreement with a study by Beckwith3c that the cyclization is
thermodynamically favored. In combination with carefully
designed experiments, it was further demonstrated that the
equilibration of the cyclopropylcarbinyl radical is faster than
its reduction by a second equivalent of Cp2TiCl in the carbonyl
substituted cases. Thus, the overall course of the reaction is
determined by a unique combination of thermodynamic and
kinetic factors.
We have reported the first 3-exo cyclization6 catalytic7 in
titanocene(III) reagents based on the stoichiometric reductive
epoxide opening introduced by Nugent and RajanBabu.8 The
efficiency of the 3-exo cyclization is thought to be based on
selective reductive trapping of cyclopropylcarbinyl radicals.
Most recently, a single example of the stoichiometric version
(4) For excellent theoretical treatments of the opening of the cyclopropylcarbinyl
radical, see: (a) Martinez, F. N.; Schlegel, H. B.; Newcomb, M. J. Org.
Chem. 1996, 61, 8547-8550. (b) Smith, D. M.; Nicolaides, A.; Golding,
B. T.; Radom L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 10223-10333. (c) Coosky,
A. L.; King, H. F.; Richardson, W. H. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 9441-
9452.
(5) (a) Barton, D. H. R.; Basu, N. K.; Hesse, R. H.; Morehouse, F. H.; Pechet,
M. J. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1966, 88, 3016-302. (b) Lange, G. L.; Merica,
A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 7897-7900. (c) David, H.; Afonso, C.;
Bonin, M.; Doisneau, G.; Guillerez, M.-G.; Guibe´, F. Tetrahedron Lett.
1999, 40, 8557-8561. (d) Sakuma, D.; Togo, H. Synlett 2004, 2501-2504.
(6) Gansa¨uer, A.; Lauterbach, T.; Geich-Gimbel, D. Chem.-Eur. J. 2004, 10,
4983-4990.
Results and Discussion
(7) For reviews, see: (a) Gansa¨uer, A.; Narayan, S. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2002,
344, 465-475. (b) Gansa¨uer, A.; Lauterbach, T.; Narayan, S. Angew. Chem.
2003, 115, 5714-5731; Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 5556-5573.
For pertinent original catalytic contributions, see: (c) Gansa¨uer, A.;
Pierobon, M.; Bluhm, H. Angew. Chem. 1998, 110, 107-109; Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 101-103. (d) Gansa¨uer, A.; Bluhm, H.; Pierobon,
M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 12849-12859. (e) Gansa¨uer, A.;
Lauterbach, T.; Bluhm, H.; Noltemeyer, M. Angew. Chem. 1999, 111,
3112-3114; Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 2909-2910. (f) Gansa¨uer,
A.; Pierobon, M.; Bluhm, H. Synthesis 2001, 2500-2520. (g) Gansa¨uer,
A.; Pierobon, M.; Bluhm, H. Angew. Chem. 2002, 114, 3341-3343; Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 3206-3208. (h) Gansa¨uer, A.; Bluhm, H.; Rinker,
B.; Narayan, S.; Schick, M.; Lauterbach, T.; Pierobon, M. Chem.-Eur. J.
2003, 9, 531-542. (i) Barrero, A. F.; Rosales, A.; Cuerva, J. M.; Oltra, J.
E. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 1935-1938. (j) Gansa¨uer, A.; Rinker, B.; Pierobon,
M.; Grimme, S.; Gerenkamp, M.; Mu¨ck-Lichtenfeld, C. Angew. Chem.
2003, 115, 3815-3818; Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 3687-3690. (k)
Justicia, J.; Rosales, A.; Bun˜uel, E.; Oller-Lo´pez, J. L.; Valdivia, M.;
Ha¨ıdour, A.; Oltra, J. E.; Barrero, A. F.; Ca´rdenas, D. J.; Cuerva, J. M.
Chem.-Eur. J. 2004, 10, 1778-1788. (l) Gansa¨uer, A.; Rinker, B.; Ndene-
Schiffer, N.; Pierobon, M.; Grimme, S.; Gerenkamp, M.; Mu¨ck-Lichtenfeld,
C. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 2337-2351. (m) Justicia, J.; Oltra, J. E.;
Cuerva, J. M. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 5803-5806.
(8) For pertinent stoichiometric contributions, see: (a) Nugent, W. A.;
RajanBabu, T. V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 8561-8562. (b) RajanBabu,
T. V.; Nugent, W. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 4525-4527. (c)
RajanBabu, T. V.; Nugent, W. A.; Beattie, M. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990,
112, 6408-6409. (d) RajanBabu, T. V.; Nugent, W. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1994, 116, 986-997. (e) Ferna´ndez-Mateos, A.; Martin de la Nava, E.;
Pascual Coca, G.; Ramos Silva, A.; Rubio Gonza´lez, R. Org. Lett. 1999,
1, 607-609. (f) Hardouin, C.; Doris, E.; Rousseau, B.; Mioskowski, C.
Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 1151-1153. (g) Barrero, A. F.; Oltra, J. E.; Cuerva, J.
M.; Rosales, A. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 2566-2571. (h) Anaya, J.;
Ferna´ndez-Mateos, A.; Grande, M.; Martia´n˜ez, J.; Ruano, G.; Rubio
Gonza´lez, R. Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 241-248. (i) Ferna´ndez-Mateos, A.;
Mateos Buro´n, L.; Rabanedo Clemente, R.; Ramos Silva, A. I.; Rubio
Gonza´lez, R. Synlett 2004, 1011-1014. (j) Ferna´ndez-Mateos, A.; Mateos
Buro´n, L.; Mart´ın de la Nava, E. M.; Rabanedo Clemente, R.; Rubio
Gonza´lez, R.; Sanz Gonza´lez, F. Synlett 2004, 2553-2557.
Computational Studies. The geometry optimizations were
carried out within the framework of density functional theory
(DFT) with the BP86/TZVP method (Becke-Perdew gradient
corrected exchange and correlation density functional9 com-
bined with a polarized split-valence basis set of triple-ú quality)
using the RI-approximation (resolution of identity) within the
TURBOMOLE10 program package (if not otherwise noted). For
the DFT energy calculations of the optimized structures, the
more extended TZVPP basis set was applied. The ab initio cal-
culations of this work were performed with the GAUSSIAN,11
MOLPRO,12 and TURBOMOLE10 program packages at the RI-
BP86/TZVP optimized structures (if not otherwise noted). The
zero point energy (ZPE) was obtained from numerical force
constants based on RI-BP86/TZVP-calculations (if not otherwise
noted). The error introduced by this approximation was checked
and in the case of TiCp2Cl2 found to be smaller than 0.3 kcal/
mol, which is probably negligible as compared to the density
functional and basis set errors. The accuracy of the single point
approximation was checked for the acid system of Tables 4 and
(9) (a) Becke, A. D. Phys. ReV. A 1988, 38, 3098-3100. (b) Perdew, J. P.
Phys. ReV. B 1986, 33, 8822-8824.
(10) Ahlrichs, R.; Ba¨r, M.; Baron, H.-P.; Bauernschmitt, R.; Bo¨cker, S.; Ehrig,
M.; Eichkorn, K.; Elliott, S.; Furche, F.; Haase, F.; Ha¨ser, M.; Horn, H.;
Huber, C.; Huniar, U.; Ko¨lmel, C.; Kollwitz, M.; Ochsenfeld, C.; O¨ hm,
H.; Scha¨fer, A.; Schneider, U.; Treutler, O.; von Arnim, M.; Weigand, F.;
Weis, P.; Weiss, H. Turbomole 5; Institut fu¨r Physikal. Chemie, Universita¨t
Karlsruhe, 2002.
9
7072 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 127, NO. 19, 2005