new synthetic methodology to meet the demands of the
current biological study.
or products derived from reaction of 4 with acetonitrile.12
Furthermore, under these conditions, the rearrangement of
the propargyl alcohol to an R,â-unsaturated ketone13 was
completely suppressed.
Encouraged by these results, we considered employing
other protected amines as nucleophiles in the reaction. In
particular, the diverse protocols for the cleavage of carbamate
protecting groups made them synthetically attractive for our
purposes; however, the use of carbamates as nucleophiles
typically requires the stoichiometric deprotonation of the
carbamate N-H.14 As a result, we were pleased to find that
a wide range of common carbamates participated effectively
in the (dppm)ReOCl3-catalyzed substitution without the need
for a stoichiometric base (Scheme 2).
The need to assess the effect of halogenation on the
potency of lipoxygenase inhibition precluded the synthesis
of pentabromopseudilin analogues by transition metal-
catalyzed biaryl coupling. In view of this, we envisioned the
preparation of the required analogues by the strategy outlined
in Scheme 1, in which diene 2 can be obtained from
Scheme 1
Scheme 2
propargylic amine 3. In turn, propargylic amines 3 could be
readily prepared from simple amines and aryl propargyl
alcohols7 using our rhenium-catalyzed propargylic substitu-
tion reaction.5 Avoiding the requirement for prior activation
of either the alcohol8 or the amine, we hoped the mild
conditions for the substitution reaction would allow for the
rapid synthesis of 1a, as well as analogues with diverse
substitution patterns.
With these preliminary results in hand, the substrate and
nucleophile scope of this reaction was investigated (Table
1). Substitution occurred with a range of propargylic alcohol
substrates, including phenyl (entries 1-5) and aryl rings
substituted with electron-withdrawing (entry 10) and electron-
donating (entries 11-13) groups. Additionally, both sterically
encumbered ortho disubstituted (entries 8 and 9) and het-
eroaromatic (entry 15) substrates cleanly participated in good
yield. Aryl-halide bonds are unaffected by the transforma-
tion (entries 6, 7, and 10). Notably, amides are unreactive
toward propargylation (entry 14), allowing for orthogonal
protection of nitrogen functionality in the propargylic adduct.
A variety of substituents on the alkynyl moiety are equally
well tolerated. Simple methyl and primary alkyl substituents
are exemplary, and although slightly increased reaction
temperatures were required, the more sterically demanding
phenyl (entry 4) and trimethylsilyl (entries 6, 7, and 12-
14) groups also perform well. Substrates containing a
terminal alkynyl unit also participate in the reaction, although
in somewhat diminished yields (compare entries 8 and 9).
Other potentially reactive groups, including terminal olefins
(entry 5) and conjugated esters (entry 11), prove tractable.
Beginning our investigation of this new catalytic reaction,
the addition of allylamine (5a) to propargylic alcohol 4 in
the presence of a rhenium(V)-oxo catalyst, (dppm)ReOCl3,9
and ammonium hexafluorophosphate in acetonitrile failed
to yield the desired propargylic amine (eq 2). Presumably,
competitive binding of the Lewis basic amine to the rhenium
center precluded the complexation of the propargylic alcohol
necessary for catalytic activity. Thus, we reasoned that
attenuation of the Lewis basicity of the nitrogen nucleophile
would allow for a more viable catalytic process. Gratifyingly,
reaction of p-nitroaniline (5b) and p-toluenesulfonamide (5c)
with 4 under the catalytic reaction conditions gave the desired
propargylic amine adducts in good yields and without
contamination from bispropargylated products.10 Addition-
ally, N-alkyl (5d) and N-aryl (5e) derivatives participated
equally well in the propargylic amination without the need
for stoichiometric activation of either the sulfonamide or the
alcohol.11 In all cases, the propargylic amines were produced
without contamination by regioisomeric allenic sulfonamides
(7) For a Ru-catalyzed amination of propargyl alcohols bearing a terminal
alkyne, see: (a) Nishibayashi, Y.; Wakiji, I.; Hidai, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2000, 122, 11019. (b) Nishibayashi, Y.; Milton, M. D.; Inada, Y.;
Yoshikawa, M.; Wakiji, I.; Hidai, M.; Uemura, S. Chem. Eur. J. 2005, 11,
1433.
(8) Propargyl phosphonates and esters have also been employed as
substrates. Cu-catalyzed: (a) Imada, Y.; Yuasa, M.; Nakamura, I.; Mura-
hashi, S.-I. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 2282. Ti-catalyzed (b) Mahrwald, R.;
Quint, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 1655.
(9) (a) Chatt, J.; Rowe, G. A. J. Chem. Soc. 1962, 4019. (b) Rossi, R.;
Marchi, A.; Marvelli, L.; Magon, L.; Peruzzini, M.; Casellato, U.; Graziani,
R. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1993, 204, 63.
(10) Amination of benzylic alcohols catalyzed by methyltrioxorhenium-
(VII) (MTO) has been described: Zhu, Z.; Espenson, J. H. J. Org. Chem.
1996, 61, 324. However, the MTO-catalyzed reaction of 1 and N-allyl ethyl
carbamate in acetonitrile (12 h, 65 °C) resulted in rearrangement to the
R,â-unsaturated ketone.
(11) For coupling of sulfonamides and propargyl alcohols using the
Mitsunobu reaction, see: Bell, K. E.; Knight, D. W.; Gravestock, M. B.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 8681.
(12) Nilsson, B. M.; Hacksell, U. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 1989, 26, 269.
(13) Various metal-oxo complexes have been reported as catalysts for
conversion of propargyl alcohols to enones (Meyer-Schuster rearrange-
ment). (a) Re: Narasaka, K.; Kusama, H.; Hayashi, Y. Tetrahedron 1992,
48, 2059. (b) V: Erman, M. B.; Gulyi, S. E.; Aulchenko I. S. MendeleeV
Commun. 1994, 89. (c) Mo: Lorber, C. Y.; Osborn J. A. Tetrahedron Lett.
1996, 37, 853.
(14) (a) Boger, D. L.; Ishizaki, T.; Wysocki, R. J., Jr.; Munk, S. A.;
Kitos, P. A.; Suntornwat, O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 6461. (b) Le
Strat, F.; Maddaluno, J. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 2791. (c) Osipov, S. N.; Burger,
K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 5659.
2502
Org. Lett., Vol. 7, No. 12, 2005