1972
N. Mishra, D. Sasmal / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 21 (2011) 1969–1973
Table 1
Structure, physicochemical and spectral properties of the newly synthesized pyrazoline derivatives
A
R
B
N
NH
Compound
R
MF
MW
Y (%) MP (°C) 1H NMR (d ppm)
FAB-MS
(m/z)
1
2
3
4
5
6
4-NO2
4-OH
4-Cl
C23H17N3O2 367.4
C23H18N2O 338.4
23H17N2Cl
76
72
178.5
148.3
151.2
158.8
125.6
130.8
3.38 (HA, t), 3.87 (HM, dd, JMA = 17.05 Hz, JMX = 11.4 Hz), 6.32 (HX, dd,
JMX = 9.6 Hz), 7.03–8.6 (13H, m, Ar-H), 10.10 (1H, s, –NH–)
3.63 (HA, t), 3.79 (HM, dd, JMA = 16.95 Hz, JMX = 11.4 Hz), 6.30 (HX, dd,
JMX = 9.5 Hz), 6.83–8.77 (13H, m, Ar-H), 9.99 (1H, s, Ar-OH) 10.12 (1H, s, –NH–)
3.71 (HA, t), 3.77 (HM, dd, JMA = 16.85 Hz, JMX = 11.4 Hz), 5.87 (HX, dd,
JMX = 9.6 Hz), 7.03–8.6 (13H, m, Ar-H), 9.95 (1H, s, –NH–)
2.34 (3H, –CH3, s) 3.66 (HA, t), 3.71 (HM, dd, JMA = 16.65 Hz, JMX = 12.4 Hz),
6.39 (HX, dd, JMX = 9.7 Hz), 7.00–8.74 (13H, m, Ar-H), 8.95 (1H, s, –NH–)
3.67 (HA, t), 3.79 (HM, dd, JMA = 16.66 Hz, JMX = 11.7 Hz), 5.96 (HX,
dd, JMX = 9.5 Hz), 7.06–8.75 (14H, m, Ar-H), 10.23 (1H, s, –NH–)
3.55 (HA, t), 3.91 (HM, dd, JMA = 16.92 Hz, JMX = 11.34 Hz), 6.16 (HX, dd,
JMX = 10.03 Hz), 7.26–8.55 (13H, m, Ar-H), 9.05 (1H, s, Ar-OH), 10.01
(1H, s, Ar-OH), 11.13 (1H, s, –NH–)
368 (M+H)
337 (M+H)
357 (M+H)
337 (M+H)
333 (M+H)
339 (M+H)
C
356.85 90
336.43 80
4-CH3
–H
C24H20N2
C23H18N2
C23H18N2O
332.4
338.4
77
81
2-OH
7
8
2,4 Di-OH
C
23H19N2O2 354.4
73
132.6
100.0
109.7
107.4
3.45 (HA, t), 3.95 (HM, dd, JMA = 16.85 Hz, JMX = 11.4 Hz), 6.16 (HX, dd, JMX = 9.6 Hz), 355 (M+H)
7.26–8.75 (12H, m, Ar-H), 9.03 (1H, s, Ar-OH), 10.33 (1H, s, –NH–)
Pyridine-
2yl
3-NO2
C22H17N3
324.39 70
85
352.43 85
3.50 (HA, t), 3.96 (HM, dd, JMA = 16.66 Hz, JMX = 11.7 Hz), 5.97 (HX, dd,
JMX = 9.41 Hz), 7.05–8.85 (13H, m, Ar-H), 10.53 (1H, s, –NH–)
3.41 (HA, t), 3.77 (HM, dd, JMA = 17.03 Hz, JMX = 11.54 Hz), 6.38 (HX,
dd, JMX = 9.9 Hz), 7.03–8.72 (13H, m, Ar-H), 10.14 (1H, s, –NH–)
2.54 (3H, –OCH3, s) 3.76 (HA, t), 3.87 (HM, dd, JMA = 16.84 Hz, JMX = 11.23 Hz),
6.42 (HX, dd, JMX = 10.07 Hz), 7.04–8.81 (13H, m, Ar-H), 9.98 (1H, s, –NH–)
325 (M+H)
368 (M+H)
353 (M+H)
9
C23H17N3O2 367.4
C24H20N2O
10
4-OCH3
Table 2
Calculated and experimental Ki values corresponding to the inhibition of MAO isoforms by the newly synthesized pyrazoline derivatives
Code
Experimentala (Ki)
MAO-A (nM) MAO-B (nM)
Human Human
17.08
Calculatedb (Ki)
MAO-A (nM) MAO-B (nM)
Inhibition type
Reversibility
MAO inhibitory selectivity
Rat
Rat
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
20.14
2.30
6.75
2.10
3.80
3.43
5.91
4.77
9.91
0.45
0.60
1.15
7.51
1.80
3.56
4.21
7.35
5.54
5.75
0.31
1.70
11.12
203.19
17.30
167.08
269.97
63.26
77.49
183.90
20.49
268.14
ND
1.71
5.97
1.72
4.45
3.31
3.10
3.18
6.41
0.33
2.51
ND
Competitive
Competitive
Competitive
Competitive
Competitive
Competitive
Competitive
Competitive
Competitive
Competitive
Competitive
Reversible
Reversible
Reversible
Reversible
Reversible
Reversible
Reversible
Reversible
Reversible
Reversible
Reversible
Selective for MAO-B
Selective for MAO-B
Selective for MAO-B
Selective for MAO-B
Selective for MAO-B
Selective for MAO-B
Selective for MAO-B
Selective for MAO-B
Selective for MAO-B
Selective for MAO-B
Selective for MAO-B
385.26
320.13
389.49
396.57
77.61
225.13
281.19
250.27
332.41
69.91
95.65
81.54
241.54
43.90
205.45
32.16
10
SEL
230.3
10566.0
301.11
67250.0
1350
1960
SEL-selegeline, ND-not done.
a
Values were determined from the kinetic experiments in which p-tyramine (substrate) was used at 500
lM to measure MAO-A and 2.5 mM to measure MAO-B. Pargyline
or clorgyline were added at 0.50 M to determine the isoenzymes A and B. Newly synthesized compounds and the known inhibitors were preincubated with the homog-
l
anates for 60 min at 37 °C. Each value represents the mean SEM of three independent experiments.
b
Values obtained through AUTODOCK program.
assessed by dialysis. Kinetic data for interaction of the enzyme
with these compounds were determined using Microsoft Excel
package program. IC50 values were determined from plots of
residual activity percentage, calculated in relation to a sample of
the enzyme treated under the same conditions without inhibitor,
versus inhibitor [I] concentration.
All the compounds were found as extremely potent and selec-
tive towards MAO-B, (Table 2) with at least 100 times more potent
than the positive control selegiline. Compounds 9 and 10 were
most promising amongst all, with Ki equal to 0.31 nM and
1.7 nM, respectively for human MAO-B, and 32.16 nM and
301.11 nM for MAO-A, respectively. Both the compounds 9 and
10 were >100 times more selective for MAO-B.
with the predicted one and how much rat and human enzyme
activity correlates. For analyzing the results, Ki values were con-
verted to pKi (negative logarithm of Ki expressed in per moles).
These values were then plotted against each compound. In the first
plot (Fig. 3a) experimental (human) and predicted values for both
MAO-A and MAO-B were compared. Where as in the second
(Fig. 3b), experimental values of human and rat enzymes (both
MAO-A and MAO-B) was compared.
A superior almost perfect agreement (Fig. 3a) between the
experimental and predicted values was obtained. The way, struc-
ture based docking with AUTODOCK corresponded the experimental
Ki values is truly exceptional. We have been consistently report-
ing4–6 and emphasizing on these outstanding correlations. These
employed protocols were not only successful in identifying the
resulting HITS through a reasonable VS procedure but also,
We have made some scrupulous analysis of the observed re-
sults. Primarily to check the congruence of the observed results