containing 1,2-dimethoxyethane (DME) to trigger the Brook
13 for the three-step sequence was 69%. Hydrolysis of the
acetal with 2 M HCl in acetone at reflux then provided ketone
(+)-2, which upon treatment with lithium hexamethyldisi-
lazide (LHMDS) in the presence of TMSCl led to the kinetic
silyl enol ether. Ring-closing metathesis employing the
second-generation Grubbs catalyst (14) furnished the requi-
site advanced tricyclic dithiane (+)-15 as a crystalline solid
(mp 101 °C).12 Single-crystal X-ray analysis established both
the structure and relative stereochemistry.
rearrangement, led to (+)-3 in 53% yield.11
Scheme 4
Having achieved construction of the azaacenaphthylene
ring system, we now faced what suprisingly proved to be a
difficult task, namely, introduction of an axial methyl group
at C(6) in (+)-15. From the stereoelectronic persepective, R
addition of a methyl nucleophile to the C(6) carbonyl would
be expected to furnish the equatorial alcohol. However,
deoxygenation of the latter via the Barton-McCombie13 and/
or related protocols14 involving radical mechanisms would,
in all likelihood, lead to the thermodynamically more stable
equatorial C(6) methyl substituent as a major product. We
therefore turned to the equatorial alcohol, readily available
upon reduction of (+)-15 with NaBH4. Unfortunately, all
attempts to displace the derived tosylate with a variety of
nucleophiles either proceeded in low yield or furnished
elimination products. We also examined the possibility of
hydrogenation of both the C(6) exomethylene and C(6)-
C(7) trisubstituted olefin congeners. Not suprisingly, in both
cases hydrogen was delivered from the less hindered R face
to furnish predominately the C(6) equatorial methyl congener
(ca. 5:1).
Undaunted, we next explored protonation of the enol or
enolate derived from the C(6) aldehyde. To this end, Wittig
olefination of (+)-15 (Scheme 5) with (methoxymethyl)-
triphenylphosphonium chloride employing t-BuOK to gener-
ate the ylide furnished an E/Z mixture (ca. 4:3) of methyl
enol ethers. To our delight, hydrolysis with 6 M HCl at 0
°C for 24 h furnished the desired axial aldehyde as the major
diastereomer (4:1; NMR).15 This result is explained via
electrostatic interactions; that is, axial delivery of a proton,
presumably the first step in the enol ether hydrolysis, would
be more sterically encumbered by electrostatic repulsion
between an incoming hydronium ion and the positive charge
of the protonated nitrogen than the equatorial delivery.
Without separation, reduction of the mixture of aldehydes
with NaBH4 provided alcohol (+)-16 in 74% isolated yield,
after separation from accompanying alcohol (+)-17 (18%).16
Mesylation of (+)-16, followed in turn by reduction of the
Sequential closure of the two rings that comprise the
indolizidine ring system, embedded in the 8b-azaacenaph-
thylene ring system of alkaloid (-)-1, was next achieved by
removal of the silyl groups (TBAF), bismesylation of the
resulting diol, and treatment of the bismesylate with potas-
sium carbonate in MeOH, followed without purification by
addition of sodium amalgam (5%); the overall yield of (+)-
(9) (a) Shimizu, A.; Nishiyama, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 6011.
(b) Chattopadhyay, S.; Mamdapur, V. R.; Chadha, M. S. Tetrahedron 1990,
46, 3667. Aldehyde (-)-10 was prepared in four steps and 95% overall
yield from commercially available ethyl (S)-3-(2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxolan-
4-yl)-2-propenoate (i): see the Supporting Information for details.
(12) (a) Okada, A.; Ohshima, T.; Shibasaki, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001,
42, 8023. (b) Arisawa, M.; Theeraladanon, C.; Nishida, A.; Nakagawa, M.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 8029. (c) Scholl, M.; Ding, S.; Lee, C. W.;
Grubbs, R. H. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 953.
(13) (a) Barton, D. H. R.; McCombie, S. W. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans.
1 1975, 1574. (b) Barton, D. H. R.; Parekh, S. I.; Tse, C.-L. Tetahedron
Lett. 1993, 34, 2733.
(14) Zhang, L.; Koreeda, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 13190 and
references therein.
(15) Hydrolysis at room temperature for 12 h led to a mixture (ca. 1:1)
of aldehydes.
(16) The stereochemistry at the newly formed position in (+)-16 was
later confirmed by comparison of the NMR data of (-)-19 with those of
known (+)-19; see ref 3.
(10) (a) Hicks, D. R.; Fraser-Reid, B. Synthesis 1974, 203. (b) Cink, R.
D.; Forsyth, C. J. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 8122.
(11) In this case, use of HMPA or DMPU as cosolvents to trigger the
Brook rearrangement resulted in poor yield (<10%).
Org. Lett., Vol. 7, No. 15, 2005
3249