PROBING P450BM-3 WITH KINETIC ISOTOPE EFFECTS
117
rates. The heme is more accessible to the substrates and, therefore, can more readily
initiate electron transfer by excluding active-site waters as Fig. 1B illustrates. This
also has the effect of decreasing hydrogen peroxide formation relative to wtP450BM-3
.
From the results it would appear that substrates 1 and 2 are excluded from the
active site by F87 in the wild-type enzyme in the resting state. This decreases the
overall rate of NADPH consumption. Furthermore, after the enzyme is reduced more
hydrogen peroxide is released for this substrate than with the wt enzyme. This is
most likely a result of disordered water protonating the iron–hydroperoxy species
proximal to the iron. For the mutant, less hydrogen peroxide and more product is
formed since the substrate is more likely to remain close to the heme which then
excludes disordered waters and increases heterolytic cleavage to the iron–oxene
species.
CONCLUSION
p-Xylene and 4,4Ј-dimethylbiphenyl were chosen to look at rotational motion in
the active site of P450BM-3. The use of KIEs coupled with the aromatic substrates
produced valuable information regarding the enzyme–substrate complex found in
P450BM-3 during metabolism. These studies conclude that the P450BM-3 F87A mutant
enhances the binding of the above aromatic substrates in the active site of P450BM-3
and consequently produces a more efficient reaction cycle for benzylic hydroxylation.
Specifically, phenylalanine 87 restricts access to the active site of wtP450BM-3 and
limits reasonable substrate binding. The stoichiometry further shows that site-directed
mutations can alter the P450 reaction cycle and enhance catalytic activities with
respect to benign synthesis. While this paper has explained certain interactions in
P450BM-3 it also raised further questions which we are actively pursuing with modeling,
isotope effects, and the use of natural fatty acids substrates in order to further develop
our understanding of P450s.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
We thank NIEHS ES 09122 for the support of this work.
REFERENCES
1. Groves, J. T., McClusky, G. A., White, R. E., and Coon, M. J. (1978) Biochem. Biophys. Res.
Commun. 81, 154–160.
2. Narhi, L. O., and Fulco, A. J. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 7160–7169.
3. Jones, J. P., Korzekwa, K. R., Rettie, A. E., and Trager, W. F. (1986) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 108, 7074–7078.
4. CaJacob, C. A., Chan, W. K., Shephard, E., and Ortiz de Montellano, P. R. (1988) J. Biol. Chem.
263, 18640–18649.
5. Bambal, R. B., and Hanzlik, R. P. (1996) Arch Biochem. Biophys. 334, 59–66.
6. Ho, P. P., and Fulco, A. J. (1976) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 431, 249–256.
7. Boddupalli, S. S., Hasemann, C. A., Ravichandran, K. G., Lu, J. Y., Goldsmith, E. J., Deisenhofer,
J., and A., P. J. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89, 5567–5571.
8. Li, H. Y., Narasimhulu, S., Havran, L. M., Winkler, J. D., and Poulos, T. L. (1995) J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 117, 6297–6299.
9. Ravichandran, K. G., Boddupalli, S. S., Hasemann, C. A., Peterson, J. A., and Deisehofer, J. (1993)
Science 261, 731–736.
10. Oliver, C. F., Modi, S., Sutcliffe, M. J., Primrose, W. U., Lian, L. Y., and Roberts, G. C. (1997)
Biochemistry 36, 1567–1572.
11. Jones, J. P., Rettie, A. E., and Trager, W. F. (1990) J. Med. Chem. 33, 1242–1246.