Communications
[1] a) D. Hellwinkel, M. Melan, Chem. Ber. 1974, 107, 616 – 626;
b) D. Hellwinkel, M. Melan, Chem. Ber. 1971, 104, 1001 – 1016;
c) S. Bamberger, D. Hellwinkel, F. A. Neugebauer, Chem. Ber.
1975, 108, 2416 – 2421; d) D. Hellwinkel, W. Schmidt, Chem. Ber.
1980, 113, 358 – 384; e) J. E. Field, D. Venkataraman, Chem.
Mater. 2002, 14, 962 – 964.
[2] M. Kuratsu, M. Kozaki, K. Okada, Chem. Lett. 2004, 33, 1174 –
1175.
[3] A bowl-shaped trioxatriphenylphosphine analogue has been
reported: a) F. C. Krebs, P. S. Larsen, J. Larsen, C. S. Jacobsen, C.
Boutton, N. Thorup, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 1208 – 1216;
b) G. K. H. Madsen, F. C. Krebs, B. Lebech, F. K. Larsen, Chem.
Eur. J. 2000, 6, 1797 – 1804.
[4] P. D. Livant, D. J. D. Northcott, Y. Shen, T. R. Webb, J. Org.
Chem. 2004, 69, 6564 – 6571.
[5] J. F. Hartwig, M. Kawatsura, S. I. Hauck, K. H. Shaughnessy,
L. M. Alcazar-Roman, J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 5575 – 5580.
[6] Crystallographic data for 2: crystal size 0.40 ꢀ 0.30 ꢀ 0.20 mm,
monoclinic, space group P21 (#4), a = 10.0772(13) ꢁ, b =
6.8136(6) ꢁ,
c = 10.0712(13) ꢁ,
b = 119.964(4)8,
V=
599.08(12) ꢁ3, Z = 2, 1calcd = 1.592 gcmꢀ3, 2qmax = 55.08, MoKa
radiation (0.71070 ꢁ), T= 123 K, m = 1.10 cmꢀ1, Tmin = 0.977,
T
max = 0.989, 4450 measured reflections, 1412 unique reflections,
1367 observed reflections (I > ꢀ10s, all data), 208 parameters,
R1(I>2s) = 0.035, Rw(I>2s) = 0.044, GOF = 1.004; Crystallo-
graphic data for 2C+·PF6ꢀ: crystal size 0.30 ꢀ 0.20 ꢀ 0.10 mm,
orthorhombic, space group Pbca (#61), a = 15.5415(10) ꢁ, b =
13.4237(8) ꢁ, c = 15.5653(10) ꢁ, V= 3247.3(4) ꢁ3, Z = 8, 1calcd
=
1.768 gcmꢀ3, 2qmax = 55.08, MoKa radiation (0.71070 ꢁ), T=
113 K, m = 2.58 cmꢀ1, Tmin = 0.953, Tmax = 0.980, 25720 measured
reflections, 3708 unique reflections, 2763 observed reflections
(I > ꢀ10s, all data), 271 parameters, R1(I>2s) = 0.043, Rw-
(I>2s) = 0.047, GOF = 1.030. CCDC 262144 (2) and CCDC
262145 (2C+) contain the supplementary crystallographic data for
this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from the
ac.uk/data_request/cif.
[7] E. T. Seo, R. F. Nelson, J. M. Fritsch, L. S. Marcoux, D. W. Leedy,
R. N. Adams, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1966, 88, 3498 – 3503.
[8] The calculation was performed at the optimized geometry
starting from the X-ray crystallographic structure with the
Gaussian03 program package.
[9] A better lcalc value (753 nm) was obtained by using the NCG
methodology with B3LYP/6-31G*: S. F. Nelsen, A. E. Konrads-
son, J. P. Telo, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 920 – 925, and
references therein.
[10] S. Hiraoka, T. Okamoto, M. Kozaki, D. Shiomi, K. Sato, T. Takui,
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 58 – 59.
[11] M. Chollet, L. Guerin, N. Uchida, S. Fukaya, H. Shimoda, T.
Ishikawa, K. Matsuda, T. Hasegawa, A. Ota, H. Yamochi, G.
Saito, R. Tazaki, S. Adachi, S. Koshihara, Science 2005, 307, 86 –
89.
4058
ꢀ 2005 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 4056 –4058