spirolides possess a seven-membered spirolinked cyclic imine
together with a novel bis-spiroacetal ring system. Initial
reports into the structure-activity relationship of these
macrolides indicated that the spirocyclic imine is the key
pharmacophore.8 The total synthesis of the spirolides has not
been reported to date; however, a synthesis of the bis-
spiroacetal moiety via an acid-catalyzed cyclization has
recently been reported.9
Scheme 2. Synthesis of the C16-C23 Dihydropyran
Fragment
In addition to our work on the synthesis of model
spiroimines10 related to the spirolides, we have previously
also reported the synthesis of a C10-C22 bis-spiroacetal
fragment that lacked the C19 tertiary alcohol group using a
double oxidative radical cyclization.11 However, problems
were encountered during the introduction of functionality at
C19 and extension of the carbon framework at C22, thus
prompting adoption of a modified synthetic plan in which
disconnection of the C23-C24 bond rather than the C22-
C23 bond was a pivotal step. The results of this revised
strategy are presented herein, providing rapid access to the
fully functionalized C10-C23 bis-spiroacetal fragment of
spirolides B and D that is homologous to our previous
fragment. This new approach relies on a silyl-modified Prins
cyclization12 to access dihydropyran 3 with the required (S)-
configuration at C22 (Scheme 1). The two spiroacetal centers
are then formed by oxidative radical cyclization of the
alcohol resulting from the Barbier coupling of this dihydro-
pyran with aldehyde 4. The syn stereochemistry in aldehyde
4 is available from an enantioselective crotylation. The alkene
in bis-spiroacetal 2 provides functionality for subsequent
installation of the tertiary alcohol. It is also envisaged that
the cis stereochemistry between the terminal rings of the bis-
spiroacetal will be established by equilibration after incor-
poration into the macrocyclic ring. Thus, initial synthesis of
trans-bis-spirocetals 1 and 2 was required.
prepared by semihydrogenation of the corresponding acety-
lene 6 in the presence of a poisoned catalyst. Use of the
Rosenmund catalyst (Pd/BaSO4)16 gave moderate E/Z selec-
tivities and poor yields, while Lindlar’s catalyst (Pd/CaCO3/
Pb)17 gave variable selectivities.18 Similar selectivity prob-
lems have been observed by others for alkynes bearing a
trimethylsilyl substituent.19
Eventually, hydroalumination of 6 in ether12a using
DIBAL-H (1 M in hexane) gave the desired olefin 7 with
high (Z)-selectivity (92:8). The desired 1,3-cis (cis/trans >
4:1) dihydropyran 3 was then prepared using a silyl-modified
Prins cyclization of vinylsilane 7 with acetal 8 catalyzed by
either indium trichloride (72%)12c,d or iron trichloride (52%).12e
Aldehyde 4 was synthesized in five steps (44% overall
yield) from monoprotected 1,3-propanediol 920 (Scheme 3).
Swern oxidation21 followed by reagent-controlled enantiose-
lective crotylation22 gave the desired (3R,4R)-allylic alcohol23
10 in 97% optical purity and dr > 95:5.24 After protection
as a tert-butyldiphenylsilyl ether, hydroboration with borane
dimethyl sulfide afforded an alcohol that was oxidized with
Dess-Martin periodinane25 to give the required aldehyde 4.
Use of Barbier conditions26a to couple aldehyde 4 with
bromide 3 proved to be more efficient than use of standard
The synthesis of the dihydropyran fragment 3 was carried
out in three steps (51% overall yield), starting from enan-
tiomerically pure O-benzyl-protected13 (R)-(+)-glycidol
(Scheme 2). Ring opening of epoxide 5 with lithium
trimethylsilylacetylide in the presence of a catalytic amount
of trimethylaluminum14 afforded homopropargyl alcohol 6
in higher yield than when using a stoichiometric amount of
boron trifluoride diethyl etherate.15 Vinylsilane 7 was initially
(15) For method, see: Ichikawa, Y.; Isobe, M.; Bai, D.-L.; Goto, T.
Tetrahedron 1987, 43, 4737.
(16) Rosenmund, K. W. Chem. Ber. 1918, 51, 686.
(17) (a) Lindlar, H. HelV. Chim. Acta 1952, 35, 446. (b) Kurihara, M.;
Ishii, K.; Kasahara, Y.; Miyata, N. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 3183.
(18) Optimum solvent was THF, affording 85:15 selectivity in favor of
the desired (Z)-7 (69%). The (Z)-configuration of 7 is crucial for the
formation of dihydropyran 3, as elimination of the trimethylsilyl group from
the resultant six-membered ring formed from the (E)-isomer is very slow
(<10% conversion after 12 h).
(19) (a) Soderquist, J. A.; Santiago, B. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31, 5113.
(b) McIntosh, M. C.; Weinreb, S. M. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 4823. (c)
Trost, B. M.; Braslau, R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30, 4657. (d) Kini, A.
D.; Nadkarni, D. V.; Fry, J. L. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 1507.
(20) Coelho, F.; Diaz, G. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 1647. For a two-step
procedure, see: Oikawa, Y.; Yoshioka, T.; Yonemitsu, O. Tetrahedron Lett.
1982, 23, 889.
(6) Falk, M.; Burton, I. W.; Hu, T.; Walter, J. A.; Wright, J. L. C.
Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 8659.
(7) McCauley, J. A.; Nagasawa, K.; Lander, P. A.; Mischke, S. G.;
Semones, M. A.; Kishi, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 7647.
(8) Hu, T.; Curtis, J. M.; Walter, J. A.; Wright, J. L. C. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1996, 37, 7671.
(9) Ishihara, J.; Ishizaka, T.; Suzuki, T.; Hatakeyama, S. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2004, 45, 7855.
(10) Brimble, M. A.; Trzoss, M. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 5613.
(11) Brimble, M. A.; Furkert, D. P. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2004, 2, 3573.
(12) Silyl-modified Prins cyclization and the silyl-modified Sakurai
cyclization are in fact the same reaction, and the name silyl Prins is adopted
herein. See: (a) Marko, I. E.; Bayston, D. J. Tetrahedron 1994, 50, 7141.
(b) Marko, I. E.; Mekhalfia, A.; Bayston, D. J.; Adams, H. J. Org. Chem.
1992, 57, 2211. (c) Dobbs, A. P.; Martinovic, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002,
43, 7055. (d) Dobbs, A. P.; Guesne, S. J. J.; Martinovic, S.; Coles, S. J.;
Hursthouse, M. B. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 7880. (e) Miranda, P. O.; Diaz,
D. D.; Padron, J. I.; Bermejo, J.; Martin, V. S. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 1979.
(13) Lai, M. T.; Oh, E.; Shih, Y.; Liu, H.-W. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57,
2471.
(21) Omura, K.; Swern, D. Tetrahedron 1978, 34, 1651.
(22) Brown, H. C.; Bhat, K. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 293.
(23) Absolute configuration of ent-10 has been assigned by X-ray
diffraction of the derived camphanic ester; see: Meilert, K. T.; Clark, G.
R.; Groutso, T.; Brimble, M. A. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. E 2005, E61, O6.
(24) Enantiomeric excess was measured by 19F NMR after formation of
the Mosher ester.
(14) For method, see: Ooi, T.; Kagoshima, N.; Ichikawa, H.; Maruoka,
K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 3328.
(25) (a) Dess, D. B.; Martin, J. C. J. Org. Chem. 1983, 48, 4155. (b)
Dess, D. B.; Martin, J. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 7277.
3498
Org. Lett., Vol. 7, No. 16, 2005