8348 J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 121, No. 36, 1999
kobs ) ko + kbuff[buffer]
Chiang et al.
The two diagonal parts of this rate profile are connected by
another horizontal segment whose molecular interpretation is
less straightforward: this portion could be due to reaction of
the monoanion with H2O, or it could be caused by ionization
of the monoanion to dianion followed by reaction of that with
H+. An argument suggesting a choice between these possibilities
is presented below.
(4)
were used to construct the lower rate profile shown in Figure
3. Hydronium ion concentrations of the buffer solutions needed
for this purpose were obtained by calculation, using literature
pKa’s of the buffer acids and activity coefficients recommended
by Bates.13
This rate profile is similar to those found for ketonization of
the enols of acetoacetic acid2 and 2-oxocyclopentanecarboxylic
acid,3 and it may be interpreted in the same way as those rate
profiles were, using the reaction scheme of eq 5. Downward
The rate law that applies to this reaction scheme is shown in
eq 6, in which kuc represents the mechanistically ambiguous
kKH+Qa,E[H+]
Qa,E + [H+]
k′Ko QEa
kobs
)
+ kuc
+
(6)
QEa + [H+]
middle portion of the rate profile and the other constants are as
defined by eq 5. Least-squares fitting of this expression produced
the following results: kKH+ ) (7.44 ( 0.20) × 102 M-1 s-1, kuc
) (2.12 ( 0.12) ×10-3 s-1, k′oK ) (3.20 ( 0.12) × 10-2 s-1
,
Qa,E ) (1.42 ( 0.08) × 10-2 M, pQa,E ) 1.85 ( 0.02,9 and QEa
) (1.13 ( 0.16) ×10-10 M, pQaE ) 9.95 ( 0.06.9
Interpretation of the horizontal middle portion of the rate
profile as representing ionization of monoanion to dianion
followed by reaction of the latter with H+ requires kuc to be
bends in rate profiles such as those found here at [H+] = 10-2
and [H+] = 10-10 M are commonly produced by ionization of
acidic groups in the substrate,14 and the present bends may be
attributed to ionization of the carboxylic acid and enolic
hydroxyl groups of the enol. Ketonization of enols is known to
occur by rate-determining protonation of the enol on its â-carbon
atom,15 and, since this profile represents reaction through
solvent-related species, protonation will take place by proton
transfer either from the hydronium ion, represented here by H+,
or from H2O. Moreover, since ketonization is an electrophilic
addition reaction, successively ionized forms of the substrate
will be more reactive than their precursors, and reaction will
take place through them even when they are relatively minor
forms. The short horizontal, “uncatalyzed” portion of this rate
profile at acidities above the first bend then represents keton-
ization through protonation on carbon by H+ of the ionized
carboxylate form of the substrate, when un-ionized carboxylic
acid is still the dominant substrate form: this reaction first
generates H+ in a fast equilibrium ionization and then uses it
up in the rate-determining step, producing an overall process
whose rate is independent of [H+]. At acidities below the first
bend, on the other hand, carboxylate ion is the principal substrate
form, and carbon protonation of this substance by H+ becomes
an acid-catalyzed process with rate proportional to [H+], which
produces a diagonal rate profile segment with slope ) -1.
At lower acidities, with [H+] < 10-8 M, the dianion becomes
the reactive form, but now [H+] is too low for H+ to be an
effective protonating agent, and H2O takes over the role of
proton donor. This produces a diagonal segment with slope )
+1 at acidities above the second bend, where the monoanion is
still the dominant substrate form: equilibrium ionization of the
second acidic (enolic) group to provide the reactive dianion
generates H+; this, however, is not used up in the rate-
determining step, and that gives an overall process whose rate
is inversely proportional to [H+], or directly proportional to
[HO-], producing an apparent hydroxide ion catalysis. At
acidities below the second bend, the dianion is the principal
substrate form, and reaction of this with H2O gives another
horizontal “uncatalyzed” profile segment.
equal to k′KH+ QE, and k′K can consequently be evaluated as
+
H
a
kuc/QE. In the case of acetoacetic acid enol, that gave the
a
improbably large rate constant k′KH ) 3 × 1011 M-1 s-1,2 and
+
this molecular interpretation was consequently rejected. The
present results, on the other hand, give the perfectly acceptable
value k′KH ) (1.88 ( 0.29) × 107 M-1 s-1, and a mechanistic
+
choice can therefore not be made here on the basis of the
magnitude of this rate constant. The alternative explanation,
however, i.e., carbon protonation of the monoanionic form of
the substrate by H2O with kuc ) kKo , leads to the improbably
low rate ratio, k′oK/kKo ) (3.20 × 10-2)/(2.12 × 10-3) ) 15.1,
for protonation of enolate ion and enol by H2O. In a number of
simple enol systems, ionization of the enol to enolate ion was
found to increase the rate of ketonization catalyzed by the same
acid by many orders of magnitude.16 For acetoacetic acid enol,
for example, this ratio is k′Ko /koK ) 5 × 104, and the reactivity-
selectivity principle leads to the expectation that this ratio should
be even greater for the present considerably less reactive system
(vide infra). Its small value thus suggests that this mechanistic
interpretation is not correct and that the other assignment, i.e.,
ionization of monoanion to dianion followed by protonation of
that by H+, is to be preferred. Such a stepwise mechanism has,
in fact, been assigned to this part of the rate profile for the
ketonization of simple enols on the basis of other evidence.16b
Additional support for the interpretation of the present rate
profile in terms of the ketonization reaction scheme of eq 5
comes from the form of buffer catalysis of these reactions. The
buffer catalytic coefficients, kbuff, of eq 4 can be separated into
their general acid, kHA, and general base, kB, components with
the aid of eq 7, in which fA is the fraction of buffer present in
the acid form. Application of this relationship gave kHA ) (3.53
kbuff ) kB + (kHA - kB)fA
(7)
( 0.60) × 10-1 M-1 s-1 and kB ) (1.20 ( 0.08) M-1 s-1 for
H2PO4- buffers and kHA ) (3.14 ( 4.95) × 10-1 M-1 s-1 and
+
kB ) (4.96 ( 0.29) M-1 s-1 for (CH2OH)3CNH3 buffers,
showing both general acid and general base catalysis in the more
acidic H2PO4- buffer solutions but only general base catalysis
(13) Bates, R. G. Determination of pH Theory and Practice; Wiley: New
York, 1973; p 49.
(14) Loudon, G. M. J. Chem. Educ. 1991, 68, 973-984.
(15) Keeffe, J. R.; Kresge, A. J. In The Chemistry of Enols; Rappoport,
Z., Ed.; Wiley: New York, 1990; Chapter 7.
(16) (a) Pruszynski, P.; Chiang, Y.; Kresge, A J.; Schepp, N. P.; Walsh,
P. A. J. Phys. Chem. 1986, 90, 3760-3766. (b) Chiang, Y.; Kresge, A. J.;
Santaballa, J. A.; Wirz, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 5506-5510.