3796
G. Luoni et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 15 (2005) 3791–3796
2. McGuigan, C.; Brancale, A.; Barucki, H.; Srinivasan, S.;
Jones, G.; Pathirana, R.; Carangio, A.; Blewett, S.; Luoni,
G.; Bidet, O.; Jukes, A.; Jarvis, C.; Andrei, G.; Snoeck, R.;
De Clercq, E.; Balzarini, J. Antiviral Chem. Chemother. 2001,
12, 27.
3. McGuigan, C.; Barucki, H.; Blewett, S.; Carangio, A.;
Erichsen, J. T.; Andrei, G.; Snoeck, R.; De Clercq, E.;
Balzarini, J. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 4993.
4. Sy, W. W.; Lodge, B. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30, 3769.
5. Wei, X.; Taylor, R. J. K. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.
1996, 2, 187.
6. Bailey, W. F.; Punzalan, E. R. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55,
5404.
UV spectroscopy did not show any significant difference
in absorbance from the octanol solution before and after
the extraction with water, indicating that no detectable
amount of compound was transferred through the
aqueous phase.
An aliquot of the aqueous layer was also analysed, but
no UV spectrum could be detected.
In view of these results, 1 mg of 4 was first suspended in
100 ml water, and left stirring for 6 h, and occasionally
sonicated. The suspension was filtered giving a clear
solution. However, when an aliquot of this aqueous
solution was analysed, no significant absorbance could
be detected and the UV spectrum could not be
registered. Therefore, due to the pronounced lipophilic-
ity of the compound, the experimental measurement of
the logP value of 4 could not be carried out using this
method and the available software for the calculation
of logP remains the most convenient tool to estimate
the logP value of such derivatives.
7. Kaszynski, P.; Sienkowska, M.; Benin, V. Tetrahedron
2000, 56, 165.
8. General experimental procedure for the one-pot coupling and
cyclisation given for compound (8). To a stirred solution of
17 (450 mg, 1.77 mmol) in anhydrous dimethylformamide
(10 ml), at room temperature and under a nitrogen atmo-
sphere, triethylamine (0.27 ml, 1.95 mmol), 18 (554.5 mg,
2.13 mmol),
tetrakis(triphenylphosphine)palladium(0)
(102.6 mg, 0.089 mmol) and copper(I) iodide (33.8 mg,
0.18 mmol) were added. The reaction mixture was stirred
for 15 h, after which time TLC (EtOAc) showed complete
conversion of the starting material. Et3N (5 ml) and CuI
(101.4 mg) were added and the reaction mixture was then
heated at 80 °C. The reaction was monitored by TLC
(EtOAc/MeOH 95:5) and after 4 h the solvent was removed
in high vacuo. The resulting residue was dissolved in
dichloromethane/methanol (1:1), and then excess Amberlite
In conclusion, the branching of the alkylaryl side chain
of BCNAs leads to a decrease in their biological activity
against VZV, with a different impact depending on the
position of the branching in the chain. In view of these
results, it is clear that ClogP is not the only factor
influencing the biological activity, the geometry and
steric hindrance in the alkylaryl side chain are also
important factors to be considered in predicting the
antiviral activity of BCNAs.
ꢀ
IRA-400 (HCO3 form) was added and the mixture was
stirred at room temperature for 30 min. The reaction
mixture was then filtered and washed with methanol and
the combined filtrate was evaporated to dryness. The crude
residue was purified by flash chromatography (EtOAc), and
the product was loaded absorbed on silica, after being
dissolved in hot methanol. The appropriate fractions were
combined and the solvent was removed in vacuo. A second
purification was necessary (CHCl3/MeOH 95:5) and the
recovered product was subsequently crystallised with
MeOH to yield the product as a white solid (136.5 mg,
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to Mrs. Anita Camps and Miss
Lies Vandenheurck for excellent technical assistance.
The research was supported by grants from the Fonds
voor Geneeskundig Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Vla-
anderen (G. 0267.04) and the Belgian Geconcerteerde
Onderzoeksacties. We also thank Helen Murphy for
excellent secretarial assistance.
1
20%). H NMR (DMSO-d6; 300 MHz) d 8.85 (1H, s, H-4),
7.74 (2H, H-A)-7.29 (2H, H-B) (AB system, J = 8.1 Hz),
7.22 (1H, s, H-5), 6.19 (1H, wt, J = 6.0 Hz, H-10), 5.32 (1H,
d, J = 4.2 Hz, 30-OH), 5.21 (1H, t, J = 5.0 Hz, 50-OH),
4.28–4.25 (1H, m, H-30), 3.94–3.93 (1H, m, H-40), 3.75–3.61
(2H, m, H-50), 2.48–2.38 (3H, m, H-20, a-CH2), 2.15–2.07,
(1H, m, H-20), 1.90–1.82, (1H, m, CH), 0.87 (6H, d,
J = 6.6 Hz, CH3). 13C NMR (DMSO-d6; 75 MHz) d 22.5
(CH3), 29.9 (CH), 41.6, 44.7, 61.0 (C-20, C-50, a-CH2), 69.9
(C-30), 87.9, 88.5 (C-10, C-40), 99.1 (C-5), 107.2 (C-4a),
124.8, 130.0 (C-Ph), 126.3 (C-ipso), 138.2 (C-4), 143.2
(C-para), 154.1, 154.2 (C-6, C-2), 171.4 (C-7a).
References and notes
´
1. McGuigan, C.; Yarnold, C. J.; Jones, G.; Velazquez, S.;
Barucki, H.; Brancale, A.; Andrei, G.; Snoeck, R.; De
Clercq, E.; Balzarini, J. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 4479.