61.0 (CH3), 56.1 (CH3 × 2), 56.0 (CH3); HRMS (CI/NH3)
Acknowledgements
calcd. for C20H23O5 (MH+): 343.1546. Found: 343.1542.
The authors are pleased to thank Dr Alain Commerc¸on and Dr
Patrick Mailliet for helpful suggestions and discussions (Aventis
Pharma, Medicinal Chemistry Department, 94400 Vitry-sur-
Seine, France). Laboratories Aventis Pharma are gratefully
acknowledged for a doctoral grant to Julia Kaffy and for
biological evaluation. This work was financially supported
by the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique and the
Institut Curie (Programme Incitatif et Coope´ratif: angiogene`se
tumorale).
(1Z,3E)-1-(3ꢀ,4ꢀ,5ꢀ-Trimethoxyphenyl)-4-phenyl-1,3-butadiene
(9). From vinylbromide 2a (250 mg, 1.68 mmol) and (E)-vinyl-
boronic acid 7 (230 mg, 0.84 mmol) was obtained, after chro-
matography (cyclohexane–EtOAc 9 : 1) and recrystallisation
from EtOAc–pentane, compound 9 as a white solid (187 mg,
75%); mp 85–87 ◦C; dH (300 MHz, CDCl3) 7.40 (2H, m,
H-2ꢀꢀ,6ꢀꢀ), 7.32 (1H, m, H-4ꢀꢀ), 7.29 (2H, m, H-3ꢀꢀ,5ꢀꢀ), 7.26 (1H,
m, H-3), 6.71 (1H, d, J 15.6, H-4), 6.60 (2H, s, H-2ꢀ,6ꢀ), 6.42
(2H, m, H-1,2), 3.89 (3H, s, OCH3), 3.88 (6H, s, OCH3 × 2);
dC (75 MHz, CDCl3) 153.0 (C × 2), 137.2 (C × 2), 134.7 (CH),
133.2 (C), 130.3 (CH), 130.1 (CH), 128.7 (C × 2), 127.7 (CH),
126.4 (CH × 2), 125.1 (CH), 106.1 (CH × 2), 61.0 (CH3),
56.1 (CH3 × 2); HRMS (CI/NH3) calcd. for C19H21O3 (MH+):
297.1491. Found: 297.1483.
References
1 G. R. Pettit, S. B. Singh, E. Hamel, C. M. Lin, D. S. Alberts and D.
Garcia-Kendall, Experientia, 1989, 45, 209–211.
2 C. M. Lin, S. B. Singh, P. S. Chu, R. O. Dempcy, J. M. Schmidt, G. R.
Pettit and E. Hamel, Mol. Pharmacol., 1988, 34, 200–208.
3 G. G. Dark, S. A. Hill, V. E. Prise, G. M. Tozer, G. R. Pettit and D. J.
Chaplin, Cancer Res., 1997, 57, 1829–1834.
4 G. M. Tozer, V. E. Prise, J. Wilson, M. Cemazar, S. Shan, M. W.
Dewhirst, P. R. Barber, B. Vojnovic and D. J. Chaplin, Cancer Res.,
2001, 61, 6413–6422.
5 C. Kanthou and G. M. Tozer, Blood, 2002, 99, 2060–2069.
6 C. M. L. West and P. Price, Anti-Cancer Drugs, 2004, 15, 179–187.
7 K. Hori and S. Saito, Br. J. Cancer, 2003, 89, 1334–1344.
8 M. Guffroy, C. Dally, P. Vrignaud, E. Beys and M.-C. Bissery, Proc.
Am. Assoc. Cancer Res., 2004, 45, abstract 5438.
9 For recent reviews on vascular disrupting agents see: (a) D. W.
Siemann, D. J. Chaplin and M. R. Horsman, Cancer, 2004, 100,
2491–2499; (b) P. E. Thorpe, Clin. Cancer Res., 2004, 10, 415–427;
(c) L. R. Kelland, Curr. Cancer Therapy Rev., 2005, 1, 1–9.
10 (a) N.-H. Nam, Curr. Med. Chem., 2003, 10, 1697–1722 and
references cited therein; (b) A. Cirla and J. Mann, Nat. Prod. Rep.,
2003, 20, 558–564; (c) K. Gaukroger, J. A. Hadfield, N. J. Lawrence, S.
Nolan and A. T. McGown, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2003, 1, 3033–3037;
(d) J.-P. Liou, Y.-L. Chang, F.-M. Kuo, C.-W. Chang, H.-Y. Tseng,
C.-C. Wang, Y.-N. Yang, J.-Y. Chang, S.-J. Lee and H.-P. Hsieh,
J. Med. Chem., 2004, 47, 4247–4257; (e) L. Sun, N. I. Vasilevich,
J. A. Fuselier, S. J. Hocart and D. H. Coy, Bioorg. Med. Chem.
Lett., 2004, 14, 2041–2046; (f) J. Kaffy, C. Monneret, P. Mailliet,
A. Commerc¸on and R. Pontikis, Tetrahedron Lett., 2004, 45, 3359–
3362; (g) G. De Martino, G. La Regina, A. Coluccia, M. C. Edler,
M. C. Barbera, A. Brancale, E. Wilcox, E. Hamel, M. Artico and
R. Silvestri, J. Med. Chem., 2004, 47, 6120–6123; (h) A. B. S. Maya,
C. Pe´rez-Melero, C. Mateo, D. Alonso, J. L. Ferna´ndez, C. Gajate,
F. Mollinedo, R. Pela´ez, E. Caballero and M. Medarde, J. Med.
Chem., 2005, 48, 556–568; (i) D. Simoni, G. Grisolia, G. Giannini,
M. Roberti, R. Rondanin, L. Piccagli, R. Baruchello, M. Rossi, R.
Romagnoli, F. P. Invidiata, S. Grimaudo, M. K. Jung, E. Hamel, N.
Gebbia, L. Crosta, V. Abbadessa, A. Di Cristina, L. Dusonchet, M.
Meli and M. Tolomeo, J. Med. Chem., 2005, 48, 723–736.
11 A. T. McGown and B. W. Fox, Anti-Cancer Drug Des., 1989, 3, 249–
254.
(1Z,3E)-1-(3ꢀ,4ꢀ,5ꢀ-Trimethoxyphenyl)-4-(3ꢀꢀ-methoxyphenyl)-
1,3-butadiene (10). From vinylbromide 2a (410 mg, 1.50
mmol) and boronic acid 8 (189 mg, 0.97 mmol) was obtained,
after chromatography (cyclohexane–EtOAc 8 : 2), compound
10 as a foam (122 mg, 37%); dH (300 MHz, CDCl3) 7.36 (1H,
dd, J 15.5, 10.6, H-3), 7.22 (1H, m, H-5ꢀꢀ), 6.99 (1H, d, J 7.8,
H-6ꢀꢀ), 6.92 (1H, m, H-2ꢀꢀ), 6.79 (1H, m, H-4ꢀꢀ), 6.68 (1H, d,
J 15.6, H-4), 6.60 (2H, s, H-2ꢀ,6ꢀ), 6.42 (2H, m, H-1,2), 3.89
(3H, s, OCH3), 3.88 (6H, s, OCH3 × 2), 3,80 (3H, s, OCH3); dC
(75 MHz, CDCl3) 159.8 (C), 153.1 (C × 2), 138.7 (C), 137.3 (C),
134.6 (CH), 133.2 (C), 130.5 (CH), 129.9 (CH), 129.8 (CH),
125.4 (CH), 119.1 (CH), 113.3 (CH), 111.8 (CH), 106.1 (CH ×
2), 61.0 (CH3), 56.1 (CH3 × 2), 56.0 (CH3); HRMS (CI/NH3)
calcd. for C20H23O4 (MH+): 327.1596. Found: 327.1588.
(1E,3E)-1-(3ꢀ,4ꢀ,5ꢀ -Trimethoxyphenyl)-4-(3ꢀꢀ -hydroxy-4ꢀꢀ -
methoxyphenyl)-1,3-butadiene (1EE). A solution of dienic
derivative 1ZE (28 mg, 0.081 mmol) in CDCl3 was stirred,
under argon, for 4 d. Compound 1EE was obtained as a foam
(19.5 mg, 70%) after chromatography (CH2Cl2); dH (300 MHz,
CDCl3) 7.07 (1H, d, J 1.9, H-2ꢀꢀ), 6.90 (1H, dd, J 8.4,1.9, H-6ꢀꢀ),
6.80 (3H, m, H-2, H-3, H-5ꢀꢀ), 6.59 (2H, s, H-2ꢀ,6ꢀ), 6.58 (d,
1, J 14.8, H-1 or H-4), 6.55 (d, 1, J 14.8 H-1 or H-4), 5.60
(1H, s, OH), 3.90 (9H, s, OCH3 × 3), 3.85 (3H, s, OCH3); dC
(75 MHz, CDCl3) 153.3 (C × 2), 146.4 (C), 145.7 (C), 137.7
(C), 133.3 (C), 132.4 (CH), 131.8 (CH), 131.1 (C), 129.0 (CH),
127.5 (CH), 119.2 (CH), 111.6 (CH), 110.6 (CH), 103.2 (CH ×
2), 61.0 (CH3), 56.1 (CH3 × 2), 56.0 (CH3); HRMS (CI/NH3)
calcd. for C20H23O5 (MH+): 343.1546. Found: 343.1543.
Biological test methods 22
12 N. Miyaura and A. Suzuki, Chem. Rev., 1995, 95, 2457–2483.
13 N. J. Lawrence, F. A. Ghani, L. A. Hepworth, J. A. Hadfield and
A. T. McGown, Synthesis, 1999, 9, 1656–1660.
14 K. Gaukroger, J. A. Hadfield, L. A. Hepworth, N. J. Lawrence and
A. T. McGown, J. Org. Chem., 2001, 66, 8135–8138.
15 H. C. Brown and S. K. Gupta, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1972, 94, 4370–
4371.
16 E. Corey and P. L. Fuchs, Tetrahedron Lett., 1972, 36, 3769–3772.
17 J. Uenishi, R. Kawahama, Y. Shiga and O. Yonemistu, Tetrahedron
Lett., 1996, 37, 6759–6962.
Tubulin polymerisation. Porcin brain tubulin was prepared
as previously reported. Tubulin polymerisation was monitored
by turbidimetry at 350 nM with a Uvikon 931 spectropho-
tometer (Kontron) equipped with a thermostatically-regulated
cuvette holder. The products were dissolved at 10 mM in DMSO
and added at variable concentrations (0.5 to 10 lM) to the
tubulin solution before polymerisation. The IC50 value is defined
as the concentration of product which inhibits the rate of
polymerisation by 50%.
18 N. Miyaura, H. Suginome and A. Suzuki, Tetrahedron, 1983, 39,
3271–3277.
19 H.-G. Herz, M. J. Queiroz and G. Maas, Synthesis, 1999, 6, 1013–
1016.
Cytotoxicity assays. Human colon carcinoma HCT116 cell
line was obtained from the American Tissue Culture Collec-
tion. The cell proliferation was evaluated by measuring the
incorporation of 14C-thymidine. The IC50 value is defined as
the concentration of product which reduces the radioactivity by
50% compared with an untreated control.
20 HyperChem version 7.0, (HyperCube Inc.).
21 This isomerisation was observed with compounds 1ZE and 1EZ in
solution in CDCl3.
22 C. Combeau, J. Provost, F. Lancelin, Y. Tournoux, F. Prod’homme, F.
Herman, F. Lavelle, J. Leboul and M. Vuilhorgne, Mol. Pharmacol.,
2000, 57, 553–563.
2 6 6 0
O r g . B i o m o l . C h e m . , 2 0 0 5 , 3 , 2 6 5 7 – 2 6 6 0