C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Table 2. Kinetic Resolution of
the deference in reactivity and selectivity between ligand 4h and
4a was again observed (4a, krel ) 25.3, entry 8, cf. entry 5). The
highest krel value of 35.8 was observed with 1l (entry 11).
Although methanol was the best reagent in the present alcoholysis
reaction in terms of reactivity, the krel value was improved to 41.2
(1a) and 39.8 (1i) by the use of 2-chloroethanol as reagent (eq 1).
2-Acyloxy-2′-vinyloxy-1,1′-binaphthyl 1 Catalyzed by Pd(OAc)2-4h
Complexa
t
conv
(%)b
ee of 1
(%)c
ee of 2
(%)c
d
entry
BINOL
R
(h)
krel
1
2
3
4
5
1b
1c
1d
1a
1e
H
3
24
63
61
43
49
44
58
56
4
54
61
96
96
6
57
77
69
77
1.1
6.1
14.3
20.3
28.7
COCH3
CO(n-C6H13)
CO(t-Bu)
The reaction appeared to take place in a similar manner with
Pd-catalyzed transfer vinylation from vinyl ethers to alcohols,9
although our work is the first example of its asymmetric version.
Actually, 1-dodecyl vinyl ether was isolated using 1-dodecanol as
reagent, though the krel value was decreased to 3.6. We expect that
the reaction is irreversible. In fact, the vinylation of 2a by ethyl
vinyl ether using Pd(OAc)2-4h did not proceed.9
CO(1-adamantyl) 42
a The reaction was carried out with 1 M solution of 1, 5 mol % of
Pd(OAc)2, 10 mol % of (R,R)-4h, and 10 equiv of MeOH in CH2Cl2 at 20
°C. b Calculated from isolated yields of 1 and 2. c Determined by HPLC.
d From ref 10.
Table 3. Kinetic Resolution of Binaphthyls and Biphenyls
Catalyzed by Pd(OAc)2-4h Complexa
In conclusion, we have achieved palladium-catalyzed kinetic
resolution of various kinds of 2,2′-dihydroxy-1,1′-biaryls by alco-
holysis reaction of their vinyl ethers. The reaction was applicable
to 1,1′-bi-2-phenols as well as 1,1′-bi-2-naphthols with high
selectivity.
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by Grant-in-Aid
for Scientific Research on Priority Areas (No. 16033204, Reaction
Control of Dynamic Complexes) from Ministry of Education,
Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan.
t
conv
(%)b
ee of 1
ee of 2
d
entry
biaryls
(h)
(%)c
(%)c
krel
1
2
1a
1f
1g
1h
1i
1i
1i
1i
1j
61
52
96
85
20
40
68
81
63
62
40
72
58
60
45
37
51
55
44
57
51
56
50
40
96 (R)
97 (R)
63 (R)
45 (R)
88 (R)
95 (R)
70 (R)
97 (R)
84 (+)
97 (+)
86 (R)
51 (R)
69 (S)
65 (S)
77 (S)
79 (S)
83 (S)
79 (S)
88 (S)
73 (S)
81 (-)
75 (-)
86 (S)
81 (S)
20.3
18.5
14.9
13.1
30.1
31.4
32.7
25.3
24.3
27.0
35.8
12.1
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures and
full characterization of new compounds (PDF). This material is available
3e
4
5
6
References
7f
8g
9
(1) (a) Noyori, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 2008-2022 and references
therein. (b) Bringmann, G.; Breuning, M.; Tasler, S. Synthesis 1999, 525-
558 and references therein. (c) Habaue, S.; Seko, T.; Okamoto, Y.
Macromolecules 2003, 36, 2604-2608. (d) Telfer, S. G.; Kuroda, R.
Coord. Chem. ReV. 2003, 242, 33-46.
10
11
12
1k
1l
1m
(2) For example: (a) Lin, G.-Q.; Zhong, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38,
1087-1090. (b) Toda, F.; Tanaka, K.; Miyamoto, H.; Koshima, H.;
Miyahara, I.; Hirotsu, K. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1997, 1877-
1885. (c) Delogu, G.; Fabbri, D.; Dettori, M. A.; Forni, A.; Casalone, G.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2000, 11, 4417-4427. (d) Meyers, A. I.; Nelson,
T. D.; Moorlag, H.; Rawson, D. J.; Meier, A. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 4459-
4473. (e) Brunel, J. M. Chem. ReV. 2005, 105, 857-897.
(3) (a) Irie, R.; Masutani, K.; Katsuki, T. Synlett 2000, 1433-1436. (b)
Barhate, N. B.; Chen, C.-T. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 2529-2532. (c) Luo, Z.;
Liu, Q.; Gong, L.; Cui, X.; Mi, A.; Jiang, Y. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2002, 41, 4532-4535. (d) Li, X.; Hewgley, B.; Mulrooney, C. A.; Yang,
J.; Kozlowski, M. C. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 5500-5511. (e) Somei,
H.; Asano, Y.; Yoshida, T.; Takizawa, S.; Yamataka, H.; Sasai, H.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 1841-1844.
a The reaction was carried out with 1 M solution of 1, 5 mol % of
Pd(OAc)2, 10 mol % of (R,R)-4h, and 10 equiv of MeOH in CH2Cl2 at 20
°C. b Calculated from isolated yields of 1 and 2. c Determined by HPLC.
d From ref 10. e At 0.7 M condition. f With 1 mol % of Pd(OAc)2 and 2
mol % of (R,R)-4h used. g (R,R)-4a was used as ligand.
enantiomeric excess of 1i increased from 88 to 95% (20 h entry 5,
and 40 h entry 6) with the increase in conversion. Even in the low
catalyst loading condition (1 mol %), the selectivity was retained
completely (krel ) 32.7, entry 7, cf. krel ) 30.1, entry 5). In addition,
(4) HKR of epoxides: (a) Tokunaga, M.; Larrow, J. F.; Kakiuchi, F.; Jacobsen,
E. N. Science 1997, 277, 936-938. (b) Schaus, S. E.; Brandes, B. D.;
Larrow, J. F.; Tokunaga, M.; Hansen, K. B.; Gould, A. E.; Furrow, M.
E.; Jacobsen, E. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 1307-1315. (c) Nielsen,
L. P. C.; Stevenson, C. P.; Blackmond, D. G.; Jacobsen, E. N. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 1360-1362.
(5) Aoyama, H.; Tokunaga, M.; Hiraiwa, S.; Shirogane, Y.; Obora, Y.; Tsuji,
Y. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 509-512.
(6) Examples of methanolysis: (a) Liang, J.; Ruble, J. C.; Fu, G. C. J. Org.
Chem. 1998, 63, 3154-3155. (b) Tanaka, S.; Saburi, H.; Ishibashi, Y.;
Kitamura, M. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 1873-1875.
(7) Watson, M. D.; Fechtenkotter, A.; Mu¨llen, K. Chem. ReV. 2001, 101,
1267-1300 and references therein.
(8) Iwasawa, T.; Tokunaga, M.; Obora, Y.; Tsuji, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004,
126, 6554-6555.
(9) Bosch, M.; Schlaf, M. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 5225-5227. Aliphatic
alcohols were vinylated as reversible reaction, but phenol was not
vinylated.
(10) Kagan, H. B.; Fiaud, J. C. Top. Stereochem. 1988, 18, 249-331. krel values
were calculated as a first-order reaction from both 1 and 2, then the lower
value was taken.
JA051750H
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 127, NO. 30, 2005 10475