C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Table 2. Ratio of Epoxide Products (4:5) Formed in the
Competition Reactions of Crotonic Acid and Derivatives of
Cinnamic Acids with Dioxirane and Oxaziridinium Epoxidizing
Reagents under Different Conditions (∆∆Gq (kcal/mol) for Each
Reaction Is in Parentheses)a,b
Ar
solvent
DMDO
oxaz. 6
oxaz. 7
Ph
Ph
D2O
61:39
(-0.27)
59:41
(-0.22)
22:78
(0.75)
22:78
(0.75)
68:32
(-0.45)
66:32
(-0.39)
90.5:9.5
(-1.34)
90:10
96.5:3.5
(-1.97)
88:12
(-1.18)
84:16
98.1:1.9
(-2.34)
91.8:8.2
(-1.43)
92.7:7.3
(-1.51)
69:31
(-0.47)
99.8:0.2
(-3.68)
98.1:1.9
(-2.34)
99.9+:0.1
(-4.10)
99.4:0.6
(-3.03)
1:1 (v:v) iPrOD:
D2O
D2O
p-CF3Ph
p-CF3Ph
2-naph
2-naph
3
(-0.98)
54:46
Figure 2. Catalytic cycle using hydrophobic iminium salts.
1:1(v:v) iPrOD:
D2O
D2O
(-0.10)
98.7:1.3
(-2.57)
95.9:4.1
(-1.87)
99.7:0.3
(-3.44)
98.9:1.1
(-2.67)
The oxaziridinium epoxidations have been made catalytic through
the use of the associated iminium salts with oxone as a stoichio-
metric co-oxidant (Figure 2).8 These iminium-catalyzed epoxida-
tions successfully reproduce the selectivities observed in the
noncatalytic epoxidations of Table 2. Five to ten turnovers of the
iminium catalyst are consistently achieved in these reactions. The
turnover number is dependent upon the pH at which the reactions
are conducted, as decomposition of the oxaziridium to an isoquino-
linium species occurs more rapidly in more alkaline conditions (see
Supporting Information). While oxone can act as an epoxidizing
agent when not in the presence of a catalyst, this background process
is very slow compared to the rate of hydrophobic epoxidation.
We have shown previously that hydrophobically induced sub-
strate selectivity in borohydride reductions can be translated into
regioselective reactions in a diketone.1 Thus, we expect that our
selective oxygen-atom transfers will also be regioselective, and
perhaps stereoselective, in polyenes.
1:1(v:v) iPrOD:
D2O
D2O
3
1:1 (v:v) iPrOD:
D2O
(-1.30)
a Competition reactions were carried to ca. 5% epoxidation of the olefins
at room temperature in the solvent with NaHCO3 and analyzed directly by
HNMR (substrate concentrations ranged from 5 to 300 mM; see Supporting
Information for specific concentrations). b Integer ratios are within an error
(1%; other ratios are within an error of (0.2% in at least duplicate runs.
hydrophobic binding interaction was likely in the transition state
of epoxidation. Because dioxirane epoxidation exhibits a nearly
identical transition-state geometry to that for oxaziridinium epoxi-
dation,3,4 we considered dimethyl dioxirane (DMDO) a reasonable
non-hydrophobic control for the hydrophobic oxaziridiniums.
The results of the competition reactions with oxaziridium salts
6 and 7 and DMDO (Table 2) show a very large increase in
selectivity for the hydrophobic olefin when 6 or 7 is used in place
of DMDO in an aqueous medium. This selectivity increases directly
with the hydrophobicity of the olefin. In the competition reaction
of a 2-naphthyl olefin and a methyl olefin, a change in ∆∆Gq of
3.23 kcal favoring epoxidation of the 2-naphthyl olefin was
observed (but minimal chirality) when oxaziridinium 7 was
employed in place of DMDO. This corresponds to a 240-fold
relative rate increase for epoxidation of the 2-naphthyl olefin, the
largest change in selectivity we have observed in a hydrophobically
accelerated atom-transfer reaction.
When a 1:1 ratio of D2O:iPrOD was used as the solvent for the
competition reactions, little or no change is observed for reactions
involving DMDO. By contrast, with hydrophobic oxaziridinium
reagents, ca. 1 kcal of binding energy is consistently lost (Table 2)
as a result of the alcohol-induced damping of the hydrophobic effect,
and the rates of reactions are much slower. Even so, significant
selectivity is still present, indicating that a completely aqueous
solution is not required. Thus for water insoluble substrates our
demonstrated selectivities in mixed solvents, reflecting more than
just hydrophobic binding forces, could be useful.
Acknowledgment. We thank the NSF and NIH for financial
support of this work.
Supporting Information Available: NMR and mass spectra,
procedures for the synthesis of previously unreported compounds, and
procedures for competition experiments. This material is available free
References
(1) (a) Biscoe, M. R.; Breslow, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 12718-
12719. (b) Biscoe, M. R.; Uyeda, C.; Breslow, R. Org. Lett. 2004, 6,
4331-4334.
(2) (a) Breslow, R. Acc. Chem. Res. 1991, 24, 159-164. (b) Blokzijl, W,;
Engberts, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1993, 32, 1545-1579. (c) Otto,
S.; Engberts, J. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2003, 1, 2809-2820.
(3) Houk, K. N.; Liu, J.; DeMello, N. C.; Condroski, K. R. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1997, 119, 10147-10152.
(4) Washington, I.; Houk, K. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 2948-2949.
(5) Sheppard, W. A.; Sheetz, C. M. Organic Fluorine Chemistry; W. A.
Benjamin, Inc.: New York, 1969.
(6) (a) Milliet, P.; Picot, A.; Lusinchi, X. Tetrahedron Lett. 1976, 19, 1573-
1576. (b) Milliet, P.; Picot, A.; Lusinchi, X. Tetrahedron 1981, 37, 4201-
4208. (c) Bohe, L.; Hanquet, G.; Lusinchi, M.; Lusinchi, X. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1993, 34, 7271-7274.
(7) Hanquet, G.; Lusinchi, X.; Milliet, P. Tetrahedron 1993, 49, 423-438.
(8) (a) Aggarwal, V. K.; Wang, M. F. Chem. Commun. 1996, 191-192. (b)
Page, P. C. B.; Rassias, G. A.; Bethell, D.; Schilling, M. B. J. Org. Chem.
1998, 63, 2774-2777. (c) Minakata, S.; Takemiya, A.; Nakamura, K.;
Ryu, I.; Komatsu, M. Synlett 2000, 12, 1810-1812.
Extensive oxidation of substrate carboxylate groups (but not un-
ionized carboxylic groups) compete with olefin epoxidation in the
mixed solvent, while very little is observed in D2O.7
JA053660I
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 127, NO. 31, 2005 10813