Chemistry Letters Vol.34, No.7 (2005)
895
This study was supported in part by the Grant of the 21st
Century COE Program from Ministry of Education, Culture,
Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Japan. The authors
wish to thank Mr. Masahiko Bando (Otsuka Pharmaceutical
Co., Ltd.) for his support in X-ray crystallographic analysis.
References and Notes
1
For a review on trifluoromethylation, see: a) R. P. Singh and
J. M. Shreeve, Tetrahedron, 56, 7613 (2000). b) G. K. S.
Prakash and M. Mandal, J. Fluorine Chem., 112, 123 (2001).
c) J.-A. Ma and D. Cahard, Chem. Rev., 104, 6119 (2004).
a) N. R. Patel, R. L. Kirchmeier, and J. M. Shreeve, Inorg.
Chem., 32, 4802 (1993). b) C. P. Felix, N. Khatimi, and
A. J. Laurent, Tetrahedron Lett., 35, 3303 (1994). c) J. C.
Blazejewski, E. Anselmi, and M. P. Wilmshurst, Tetrahedron
Lett., 40, 5475 (1999). d) V. A. Petrov, Tetrahedron Lett., 41,
6959 (2000). e) G. K. S. Prakash, M. Mandal, S. Schweizer,
N. A. Petasis, and G. A. Olah, Org. Lett., 2, 3173 (2000). f)
G. K. S. Prakash, M. Mandal, and G. A. Olah, Synlett, 2001, 77.
a) W. H. Prikle and J. R. Hanske, J. Org. Chem., 42, 2436
(1977). b) W. H. Prikle and J. R. Hanske, J. Org. Chem., 46,
3239 (1981). c) Y. Wang and H. S. Mosher, Tetrahedron Lett.,
32, 987 (1991). d) V. A. Soloshonok and T. Ono, J. Org. Chem.,
62, 3030 (1997). e) D. W. Nelson, J. Owens, and D. Hiraldo,
J. Org. Chem., 66, 2572 (2001).
Figure 1. An ORTEP representation of the structure of 2a.
2
O
S
NH2
CF3
HN
p-Toly
NH
2 HCl
1N HCl
MeOH
HO
O
O
*
CF3
2j (>99 %de)
CF3
O
1 step
rt
92% 3 (>99 %ee)
4
3
4
Scheme 1. Synthesis of 3,3,3-Trifluoroalanine.
not proceed effectively when the reactions were tried by using
TMSCF3 in the presence of a catalytic amount of a Lewis base.
The reason for these results is not made clear yet.
a) G. K. S. Prakash, M. Mandal, and G. A. Olah, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed., 40, 589 (2001). b) G. K. S. Prakash, M. Mandal, and
G. A. Olah, Org. Lett., 3, 2847 (2001) c) G. K. S. Prakash
and M. Mandal, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 124, 6538 (2002).
a) T. Mukaiyama, Y. Kawano, and H. Fujisawa, Chem. Lett.,
34, 88 (2005). b) Y. Kawano, H. Fujisawa, and T. Mukaiyama,
Chem. Lett., 34, 422 (2005).
Next, the reaction of various chiral N-sulfinylimines with
TMSCF3 was tried by using an equimolar amount of AcON-n-
Bu4 in DMF (Table 2). Aromatic aldimines having electron-
donating or -withdrawing groups reacted smoothly to afford
the trifluoromethylated adducts in high yields with good diaster-
eosectivities (Entries 1–10). Aliphatic aldimine having no ꢀ-
proton adjacent to the imino group reacted smoothly to afford
the desired adduct in high yield whereas those having ꢀ-protons
gave the adducts in low yields because the abstraction of an
ꢀ-proton took place competitively (Entry 11). However, when
the reactions were carried out in the coexistence of an equimolar
amount of PhON-n-Bu4, the corresponding trifluoromethylated
adducts were obtained in moderate yields with good diastereo-
sectivities (Entries 12 and 13).
These trifluoromethylated adducts were easily purified by
recrystallization of the crude mixture from hexane–AcOEt
and, optically pure major diastereomers were obtained (Scheme
1).6 The absolute configuration of newly formed stereogenic
carbon was determined by X-ray analysis of compound 2a7
and the configurations of 2b and 2m were assigned by compar-
ing 19F NMR chemical shifts of 2a with that of 2b and 2m
(Figure 1).8
Thus, obtained amines were known as useful precursors for
the synthesis of ꢀ-trifluoromethyl ꢀ-amino acids. Since Demir
et al. reported that 2,2,2-trifluoro-1-(furan-2-yl)ethylamine 3
was converted into 3,3,3-trifluoroalanine 4 by oxidative cleav-
age of the furan ring (Scheme 1),9 the synthesis of 3 implies a
formal synthesis of 3,3,3-trifluoroalanine.10
It is noted that AcON-n-Bu4 behaved as an effective Lewis
base catalyst in trifluoromethylation of chiral N-sulfinylimines.
This method is quite practical since the reaction proceeded by
using mild and readily available Lewis base catalysts such as
AcON-n-Bu4 and PhON-n-Bu4, and the adducts can be purified
easily by crystallization because the catalyst is removed just
by treating with water. Further study on this reaction is now in
progress.
5
6
Recrystallization of compound 2a.
O
O
S
S
p-Toly
p-Toly
Recryst.
HN
Ph
2a (>99% de)
HN
Hexane - AcOEt
CF3
Ph
H
2a (92% de)
82 %
7
Crystal data: C15H14NOF3S (FW ¼ 313:34), monoclinic, P21,
ꢀ ꢀ ꢀ
a ¼ 8:621ð1Þ A, b ¼ 8:315ð1Þ A, c ¼ 11:0901ð8Þ A, ꢁ ¼
107:489ð6Þ , V ¼ 758:2ð1Þ A , Z ¼ 2:0, Dcalcd ¼ 1:372 g cmꢂ3
,
ꢁ
ꢀ 3
T ¼ 295 K. X-ray intensities were measured on a Rigaku
AFC-5S diffractometer with graphite-monochromated Mo Kꢀ
radiation. The final R factors was 0.052 (Rw ¼ 0:101 for all
data) for 1519 reflections with I > 2ꢂðIÞ.
8
9
Structure assignment of diastereomer was based on the
19F NMR chemical shift, which resonates at a higher field in
the (Ss,R)-isomer than in the (Ss,S)-isomer.
A. S. Demir, O. Sesenoglu, and Z. Gercek-Arkin, Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry, 12, 2309 (2001).
10 Compound 3: Determined by HPLC (CHIRALCEL OD-H,
hexane/iPrOH = 50:1, flow rate = 1.0 ml/min): tR ¼ 11:3
21
min. ½ꢀꢃD ¼ ꢂ6:7 (c 1.01, MeOH).
11 Typical experimental procedure is as follows (Table 2,
Entry 1); to a stirred solution of AcON-n-Bu4 (60.3 mg,
0.2 mmol) in DMF (1.0 mL) were added successively a solution
of chiral N-benzylidene-p-toluenesulfinamide (48.7 mg, 0.2
mmol) in DMF (0.2 mL) and TMSCF3 (43.7 mL, 0.28 mmol,
95% content) at ꢂ40 ꢁC. The mixture was stirred for 1 h at
the same temperature and quenched with saturated aqueous
NH4Cl. The mixture was extracted with AcOEt and organic
layer was washed with brine and dried over anhydrous Na2SO4.
After filtration and evaporation of the solvent, the resulted
residue was purified by preparative TLC to give the desired
product (57.1 mg, 91%) as a colorless prisms.
Published on the web (Advance View) May 28, 2005; DOI 10.1246/cl.2005.894