Scheme 1
Scheme 2
phenylenes of this type are important because bond alterna-
tion induced by the cyclobutadienoid rings, as pictured in
the structural drawing and supported by a calculated structure
(B3LYP/6-31G*) of 4d (for this and other calculations, see
Supporting Information), is expected to enable superdelo-
calization.5 In 4, such an effect would involve the Hu¨ckel-
aromatic 18 and 30 electron supercircuits, respectively, of
the inner and outer periphery of the polycycle.
12 created 13, possessing all the carbon atoms of 1. Finally,
bromine-iodine exchange, followed by TMS deprotection
and an intramolecular Sonogashira coupling, afforded 1. A
topological alternative to the above scheme is presented by
the approach to 1b and proceeded with comparable ef-
ficiency. Overall, the yields from 5 are 33% to 1a, 7.6% to
1b, and 16% to 1c, a rather satisfactory outcome.
We report on the synthesis of 1d and its derivatives 1a-c
and on partly successful attempts to reach 4.
The preparative strategy to 12b entailed the independent
formation of 1,2,4,5- and 1,2,3,4-substituted arene fragments
that translate into the “blue” and “red” arene units of 1
(Scheme 1), respectively. Synthesis of the “blue” building
blocks 7 and 8 (Scheme 2) commenced with a Sonogashira6
reaction (PdCl2(PPh3)2, CuI, NEt3) that targeted the more
reactive iodinated positions in 1,5-dibromo-2,4-diiodoben-
zene 5.7 The ensuing bromine-iodine exchange produced 6
in high yields, which was functionalized via a second
Sonogashira reaction, this time with TMSA, to give 7. The
final replacement of bromine with iodine furnished 8, ready
to be coupled with the “red” component.
Dodecaynes 1a-c are yellow-brown waxy solids that are
stable to air, both neat and in solution. On the other hand,
parent 1d decomposed quickly, even in solution, thus
precluding its isolation and full characterization. The elec-
tronic spectra are characterized by a lowest-energy band (λmax
) 369-377 nm) that is significantly shifted bathochromically
relative to that of the parent dehydrobenz[18]annulene (λmax
) 341 nm), a reflection of the extensive alkynyl substitution.
The NMR spectra feature the characteristically deshielded
intracyclic hydrogen signals at δ ∼7.8 ppm2 and the
1
appropriate number of H and 13C peaks. An exception is
The triynes 9, reported previously,5c,8 were chosen as the
precursors for the “red” moieties of 1 (Scheme 3). Selective
TMS removal from 9 generated the corresponding terminal
alkynes, which were coupled with iodides 8 to give the highly
functionalized diarylacetylenes 10. Compounds 10 were the
source of both pieces needed to assemble 13. Protodetri-
methylsilylation provided 11; alternatively, another bromine-
iodine exchange led to 12. Sonogashira coupling of 11 and
1c, in which the DMTS spectral regions revealed not two
but four sets of resonances for each of the three methyl
groups, illustrated for the silylmethyls on top of Figure 1.
DFT calculations predict a nonplanar configuration for 1c,
rendering these groups diastereotopic in the NMR experiment
at slow exchange. Enantiomerization, tantamount to rotation
around the core diarylalkyne bonds,9 and hence coalescence,
appears to be remarkably sluggish, as measured by VT-NMR
at 62 and 90 °C, respectively (Figure 1, bottom). Peak-shape
analysis10 provided an activation barrier of 19.4 ((0.4) kcal
mol-1. In contrast, neither acyclic precursor analogues nor
a related hexaethynyldehydrobenz[12]annulene5c were mobile
conformationally at temperatures as low as -80 °C.11
With systems 1a-d available, experiments were executed
aimed at accessing circular [8]phenylene 4. Since 1c proved
(4) For triple cyclizations of this type, see: Bruns, D.; Miura, H.;
Vollhardt, K. P. C.; Stanger, A. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 54 and references therein.
(5) For reviews of the phenylenes, see: (a) Miljanic´, O. Sˇ.; Vollhardt,
K. P. C. In Carbon-Rich Compounds: Molecules to Materials; Haley, M.
M., Tykwinsky, R. R., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2005; in press. (b)
Vollhardt, K. P. C.; Mohler, D. L. In AdVances in Strain in Organic
Chemistry; Halton, B., Ed.; JAI: London, 1996; pp 121-160. For a related
approach to circular [6]phenylene, “antikekulene”, see: (c) Eickmeier, C.;
Junga, H.; Matzger, A. J.; Scherhag, F.; Shim, M.; Vollhardt, K. P. C.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 2103.
(6) Sonogashira, K. In Handbook of Organopalladium Chemistry for
Organic Synthesis; Negishi, E.-i., Ed.; Wiley: New York, 2002; Vol. 1, pp
493 and references therein.
(7) Goldfinger, M. B.; Crawford, K. B.; Swager, T. M. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1997, 119, 4578.
(8) While 9a was not known prior to this work, it was readily prepared
using the procedure described for 9b,c (see Supporting Information).
(9) For the observation of hindered rotation in 2,2′,6,6′-tetrakis(alkynyl)-
diphenylacetylenes, see: Miljanic´, O. Sˇ.; Han, S.; Holmes, D.; Schaller,
G. R.; Vollhardt, K. P. C. Chem. Commun. 2005, 2606.
(10) (a) Oˆ ki, M. Applications of Dynamic NMR Spectroscopy to Organic
Chemistry; VCH: Weinheim, 1985. (b) Gasparro, F. P.; Kolodny, N. H. J.
Chem. Educ. 1977, 54, 258.
(11) Hisaki, I.; Vollhardt, K. P. C. Unpublished results.
4002
Org. Lett., Vol. 7, No. 18, 2005