Cu Ligand Influences on Heme-Peroxo-Cu Formation
Resonance Raman Spectroscopy. In the glovebox, 1-5 mM
THF solutions of [(2L)FeIICuI]+ (3) were prepared and transferred
to NMR tubes (∼0.5 mL of solution/tube) and capped with tight-
fitting septa. The sample tube were placed in a -95 °C cold bath
(N2/Hexane) for 10 min and oxygenated by using 16O2, 18O2, and
16/18O2. (18O2 and 16/18O2 gases were purchased from ICON, Summit,
NJ. 16O2 was purchased from BOC gases, Murray Hill, NJ.) The
labeled gases were cooled in dry ice bath for 5 min and injected
into the solution by using a Hamiltion gastight syringe. The
oxygenated samples were set in a cold bath for ∼10 min, after
which the sample tubes were frozen in liquid N2 and sealed under
their respective labeled O2 atmosphere. RR spectra were collected
on a McPherson 2061/207 spectrograph equipped with a liquid-
nitrogen-cooled LN-1100PB CCD detector. The 413-nm laser
excitation was obtained from a Coherent Innova 302 krypton laser,
and the intensity at the sample was kept below 10 mW to prevent
adverse effect from the laser illumination. A matching Kaiser
Optical supernotch filter was used to minimize interference from
the Rayleigh scattering. Frequencies were calibrated relative to
several frequency standards and are accurate to (1 cm-1. To keep
the sample at 90 K during data acquisition, the samples were kept
in a copper coldfinger immersed in liquid nitrogen. The samples
were also spun within the holder to minimize photodegradation.
Stopped-Flow Kinetics. Rapid kinetics were followed using an
SF-21 variable-temperature stopped-flow unit (Hi-Tech Scientific,
2 mm path length cell) combined with a TIDAS/NMC301-MMS/
16 VIS/500-1 diode array spectrometer (J & M; 256 diodes, 300-
1100 nm, 0.8 ms minimum sampling time). Data acquisition (up
to 256 complete spectra; up to four different time bases) was
performed using the Kinspec program (J & M). For numerical
analysis, all data were pretreated by factor analysis using the Specfit
program.85 To obtain variable O2 concentrations in solution, a gas
mixing unit was employed which consisted of two MKS PR-4000
control towers equipped with MKS general purpose Mass-Flo
controllers of type 1179A calibrated for either 200 sccm N2 (used
for O2 regulation) or 500 sccm N2 (used for argon regulation). The
regulated amounts of argon and O2 were mixed which yielded a
specific ratio of O2 to argon. The mixed gases were passed through
a drying column and then bubbled through the solution to yield a
specific concentration of O2 in the solvent. For the kinetic studies,
CH2Cl2 (UVASOL, Merck) and EtCN (pa, Merck, predistilled from
phosphorus pentaoxide) were distilled from calcium hydride and
under argon prior to use. Thermal expansion of the solvent was
taken into account.
used for the analysis of k2. The concentration profile based on
the kinetic model [(2L)FeIICuI]+ (3) + O2 f [(EtCN)(2L)FeIII-
(O2-)‚‚‚CuI(NCEt)]+ (5) and [(EtCN)(2L)FeIII-(O2-)‚‚‚CuI(NCEt)]+
(5) f [(2L)FeIII-(O22-)-CuII]+ (6), followed by (in some cases) a
slow first-order relaxation, was calculated by numerical integration
using the SPECFIT/32 program. Thermal expansion of CH2Cl2 was
taken into account using r (g/mL) ) [1.48177 + 2.61843 × 10-3
X
- 1.7766 × 10-5X2 + 2.38421 × 10-8X3, where X ) T (K)] for
the solvent density as a function of temperature. It should be noted
that the presence of 6% propionitrile was not considered to change
the temperature dependence of the solvent density from that of pure
CH2Cl2. A linear combination of the density correction factors for
6% propionitrile and 94% CH2Cl2 yielded results similar to those
obtained using 100% CH2Cl2. Figure S10 shows the Eyring plot
for the measurement of k1 (the superoxo formation), and Figure
S11 shows the Eyring plot for the measurement of k2 (the peroxo
formation).
For the reaction of (F8)FeII/[CuI(LMe2N)]+ with O2 in CH2Cl2/
6% EtCN (Scheme S1 in Supporting Information), three series of
different (F8)FeII, [CuI(LMe2N)]+, and dioxygen concentrations were
used to carry out a total of 289 measurements between -105 and
+20 °C. Of these 192 were used for the final analysis. The
concentrations of FeII, CuI, and dioxygen solutions used were the
following: 0.15 mM FeII, 0.20 mM CuI, 1.90 mM O2; 0.27 mM
FeII, 0.39 mM CuI, 1.90 mM O2; 0.15 mM FeII, 0.26 mM CuI, 0.63
mM O2. Reaction time measured ranged from 1.7 to 46 s. Figure
S12 shows the Eyring plot for the measurement of k1 (the superoxo
formation), and Figure S13 shows the Eyring plot for the measure-
ment of k2 (the peroxo formation).
Spectrophotometric Titration of [(2L)FeIII-(O22-)-CuII]+ (6).
In the glovebox, a known concentration (0.2-0.4 mM range in
toluene/10% MeCN) of a stock solution of [(2L)FeIICuI]+ (3) was
prepared and 2 mL of the solution was transferred to a 2 mm path
length Schlenk cuvette. This was capped with a 14/24 adapter
(purchased from Chemglass CG1036-14) whose opposite end was
designed to fit a rubber septum. Two appropriate size rubber septa
and a Teflon septum were used to seal the Schlenk cuvette from
the atmosphere. The cuvette assembly was then transferred to the
low-temperature UV-vis spectrometer and cooled to -75 °C.
Separately, a 250 mL two sidearm Schlenk flask, whose neck was
closed with a rubber septum and one sidearm was connected to an
oil bubbler, was filled with 1.01% O2 in Ar gas mixture (custom
mixture purchased from Potomac Airgas, Baltimore, MD) under 1
atm pressure. A Hamilton gastight syringe equipped with a 3-way
purge valve (for Ar purging of the syringe and the needle) was
used to transfer known amounts of the 1.01% O2 gas to the cold
solution of 3. To the cuvette containing a solution of 3, was added
0.5 equiv, 1 equiv, and 2 equiv of dioxygen in three separate
experiments. Each aliquot of dioxygen was bubbled directly into
the solution via syringe, and the resulting solution was allowed to
react until no spectral change was observed in the UV-vis spectrum
(typically, it takes ∼60-70 h), after which excess dioxygen was
added to the solution to reach full formation of 6 for comparison.
Note that these very long reaction times are required to complete
the irreversible (at these temperatures) Fe-Cu complex oxygenation
reaction, when a near stoichiometric amount of O2 gas is being
added to the cuvette assembly. Whereas about half the amount of
reduced starting material 3 was present with addition of 0.5 equiv
of O2, ∼90% of full formation of 6 was obtained with 1 equiv of
O2 and complete oxygenation was obtained with 2 equiv of O2.
(Consecutive addition of smaller aliquots, e.g., 0.2 equiv, of
dioxygen to the same solution did not give reliable results
presumably due to the relatively poor O2-binding ability of 3 under
For the reaction of [(2L)FeIICuI]+ (3) with O2 in CH2Cl2/6%
EtCN, 6 series of experiments were performed with the following
room-temperature reactant postmixing concentrations ([3]/[O2]/
series name): 1.64 × 10-4 M/1.90 × 10-3 M/ESTA; 2.37 × 10-4
M/1.90 × 10-3 M/ESTB; 2.26 × 10-4 M/1.90 × 10-3 M/ ESTC;
1.11 × 10-4 M/1.90 × 10-3M/ESTD; 1.10 × 10-4 M/6.00 × 10-4
M/ESTE; 2.16 × 10-4 M/6.00 × 10-4 M/ESTF. Figure 6 was made
from ESTF4 which was data collected at 168 K. Data for a total of
329 individual runs between 168 and 193 K with data collection
times between 0.04 and 1.48 s were obtained. Of these, 159 data
sets (over a temperature range 168-179 K, where the formation
of the [(2L)FeIII-(O2-)‚‚‚CuI]+ (5) superoxo species could be
observed) were used for analysis of k1 and 278 data sets (over the
temperature range 168-191 K, where the formation of the [(2L)-
FeIII-(O22-)-CuII]+ (6) peroxo species could be observed) were
(85) SPECFIT/32 is a trademark of Spectrum Software Associates,
copyright 2000-2002 Spectrum Software Associates (R. Binstead and
A. D. Zuberbu¨hler). Original publication: Gampp, H.; Maeder, M.;
Meyer, C. J.; Zuberbu¨hler, A. D. Talanta 1985, 32, 95-101.
Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 44, No. 20, 2005 7027