6868
O. Vassylyev et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 46 (2005) 6865–6869
J. M.; Weck, M.; Jones, C. W. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2005,
347, 161–171.
ability of (4-methoxyphenyl)boronic acid to homocou-
pling in comparison with non-substituted substrate even
in non-aqueous solution.19 The possibility of deborona-
tion of arylboronic acids with an electron-donor group
in the benzene ring under mild conditions was men-
tioned by Lapert20 and Lange,21 and the promoting
effect of silica for this pathway was reported by Schilling
and Kaufmann.22 We assume that the OH group in the
4-position favored these side-reactions.
5. (a) Phan, N. T. S.; Brown, D. H.; Styring, P. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2004, 45, 7915–7919; (b) Wang, Y.; Sauer, D. R. Org.
Lett. 2004, 6, 2793–2796; (c) Buchmeiser, M. R.; Schare-
ina, T.; Kempe, R.; Wurst, K. J. Organometal. Chem.
2001, 634, 39–46; (d) Wang, B.; Gu, Y.-L.; Yang, L.-M.;
Suo, J.-S. Fenzi Cuihua 2003, 17, 468–480; (e) Kaneda, K.
Yuki Gosei Kagaku Kyokaishi 2003, 61, 436–444; (f)
Blanco, B.; Mehdi, A.; Moreno-Manas, M.; Pleixats, R.;
Reye, C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 8789–8791; (g)
Baleizao, C.; Corma, A.; Garcia, H.; Leyva, A. J. Org.
Chem. 2004, 69, 439–446; (h) Gurbuz, N.; Ozdemir, I.;
Cetinkaya, B.; Seckin, T. Appl. Organometal. Chem. 2003,
17, 776–780; (i) Corma, A.; Das, D.; Garcia, H.; Leyva, A.
J. Catal. 2005, 229, 322–331.
The conversion of other boronic acids was low as well.
As reported earlier, the low conversion of (4-formylphen-
yl)boronic acid did not depend on the experimental
conditions.23 Only an insignificant conversion of 3-thi-
enylboronic acid was detected. Surprisingly, no reaction
occurred with (4-vinylphenyl)boronic acid. Recently, we
found that for most catalysts (except Pd(PPh3)4), (4-
vinylphenyl)boronic acid does not react with arylbro-
mides in the presence of water, while its conversion in
non-aqueous solvent systems remains low.24 As to the
non-aromatic boronic acids, vinylboronic acid dibutyl
ester yielded moderate conversions, while cis-1-propen-
ylboronic acid did not react. (Reactions with 0% yield
are not shown in Table 2.)
6. (a) Corma, A.; Garcia, H.; Leyva, A.; Primo, A. Appl.
Catal. A: General 2004, 257, 77–83; (b) Corma, A.; Garcia,
H.; Leyva, A. Appl. Catal. A: General 2002, 236, 179–185.
7. Synthetic procedure for complexes 4–6. 0.011 mol of
ligands 1–3 was dissolved in 10 mL of CH2Cl2, and a
solution of 0.01 mol of [PdCl2(C6H5CN)2] in 10 mL of
CH2Cl2 was added at room temperature. The solvent was
removed in vacuum, the residue was washed by pentane
and diethyl ether. Dichloro(N-(30-trimethoxysilyl)propyl-
1,2-ethanediamine-N,N0)-palladium (4): white crystals
(dioxane/ethanol, decomp. >180 ꢁC); IR (cmꢀ1): 774 (Si–
O–C), 909, 1074, 1189 (Si–O–C), 1456 (CH2), 2838, 2941
(CH2). Dichloro-bis[2-(20-trimethoxysilyl)ethylpyridine]-
palladium (5): yellow crystals (dioxane, decomp.
The conversion of iodo-substituted aromatic com-
pounds was much higher than the bromo-substituted
ones. In the case of 4-iodobenzoic acid, the reaction
was completed within 1 h. For the reaction with 4-iodo-
anisole, we used a solvent system with lower water con-
tent in order to provide a sufficient solubility of all
reactants.
1
>200 ꢁC); H NMR (d): 1.61 (t, 2H, SiCH2), 3.73 (s, 9H,
OCH3), 4.03 (t, 2H, Py-CH2), 7.20–7.34 (m, 2H, Py-CH),
7.69 (t, 1H, Py-CH), 9.01 (d, 1H, Py-CH); IR (cmꢀ1): 747
(Si–O–C), 770, 791 (Py), 912, 1073, 1190 (Si–O–C), 1448,
1483 (CH2), 1568, 1604 (Py), 2839, 2940 (CH2). Dichloro-
bis[1-(30-trimethylsilyl)propaneamine]-palladium (6): white
crystals (dioxane/ethanol, decomp. >210 ꢁC); IR (cmꢀ1):
774 (Si–O–C), 911, 1024, 1189 (Si–O–C), 1487 (CH2), 2935
(CH2).
In summary, immobilized dichloro(N-(30-trimethoxysil-
yl)propyl-1,2-ethanediamine-N,N0)-Pd showed a high
activity for Suzuki coupling reactions, which makes it
a useful system for biaryl compound synthesis. Most
importantly, leaching appeared negligible. Future work
will be devoted to the understanding of leaching in
different solvent systems and to the use for other
reactions.
8. Preparation of immobilized complexes 10–12. 0.01 mol of
ligands 1–3 was dissolved in 25 mL of toluene. Two grams
of previously dehydrated silica was suspended, and the
reaction mixture was kept at 100 ꢁC for 18 h. The silica
was filtered, washed with hot toluene and dried in a
vacuum. Obtained hybrid materials 7–9 were suspended in
a solution of 0.01 mol of [PdCl2(C6H5CN)2] in 2 5 mL of
i-PrOH and refluxed for 4 h. The brown product was
filtered, washed with 2-C3H7OH, CH2Cl2, and dried in a
vacuum.
References and notes
9. Zhuravlev, L. T. Langmuir 1987, 3, 316–318.
10. Loadings of the ligands and Pd were calculated on the
basis of elemental analysis.
11. For all tests, a halide aryl compound (1 mmol), a boronic
acid (1 mmol) and a base (3 mmol) were dissolved in
10 mL of a solvent. A catalyst (amount containing
0.01 mmol of Pd) was then added to the reaction mixture.
The reaction was monitored by HPLC (Shimadzu SCL-
10A with Discovery C18 column, 15 cm · 4.6 mm, 5 lm;
eluent: methanol/water, 60:40).
1. (a) Suzuki, A. Modern Arene Chemistry. In The Suzuki
Reaction with Arylboron Compounds in Arene Chemistry;
Astruc, D., Ed.; Wiley: Weinheim, Germany, 2002; pp 53–
106; (b) Bellina, F.; Carpita, A.; Rossi, R. Synthesis 2004,
2419–2440; (c) Blaser, H.-U.; Indolese, A.; Schnyder, A.;
Steiner, H.; Studer, M. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2001, 173,
3–18.
2. Panarello, A. P.; Vassylyev, O.; Khinast, J. G. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2005, 46, 1353–1356.
3. (a) Conlon, D. A.; Pipik, B.; Ferdinand, S.; LeBlond, C.
R., Jr.; Sowa, J. R., Jr.; Izzo, B.; Collins, P.; Ho, G.-J.;
Williams, J. M.; Shi, Y.-J.; Sun, Y. Adv. Synth. Catal.
2003, 345, 931–935; (b) Biffis, A.; Zecca, M.; Basato, M.
J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2001, 173, 249–274; (c) Horniak-
ova, J.; Raja, T.; Kubota, Y.; Sugi, Y. J. Mol. Catal. A:
Chem. 2004, 217, 73–80; (d) Heidenreich, R. G.; Kohler,
K.; Krauter, J. G. E.; Pietsch, J. Synlett 2002, 1118–1122.
4. (a) Yu, K.; Sommer, W.; Weck, M.; Jones, C. W. J. Catal.
2004, 226, 101–110; (b) Yu, K.; Sommer, W.; Richardson,
12. The effect of site isolation was reported in (a) Grubbs, R.;
Lau, C. P.; Cukier, R.; Brubaker, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1977, 99, 4517–4518; (b) Pugin, B. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem.
1996, 107, 273–279.
13. (a) Shimizu, K.; Koizumi, S.; Hatamachi, T.; Yoshida, H.;
Komai, S.; Kodama, T.; Kitayama, Y. J. Catal. 2004, 228,
141–151; (b) Thathagar, M. B.; Beckers, J.; Rothenberg,
G. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2003, 345, 979–985.
14. The reaction was carried out until a conversion of 30–50%
was reached. Then, the catalyst was filtered and the