Nagamani et al.
the azobenzene units are connected through one or more
insulating methylene units; thus, the azobenzene units
act independently.15 In the present case, each azobenzene
unit acts as a substituent on the other because they are
conjugated through the ortho oxygen linkers. 2,2′-
Dimethoxyazobenzene exhibits a typical splitting of the
π-π* band and is explained based on the steric inhibition
to planarity in these systems, which arises because of
the bulky ortho substituent.16 But, the X-ray results of
1(t,t) and 2(t) show that the azobenzene units are not
distorted from planarity to a large extent. So, it is
probable that the splitting of the π-π* band in the
absorption spectra stems from the electronic effect of the
ortho oxygen substituent as suggested by Morris and
Brode.17 Figures 6c and 7c show the absorption spectra
of the pure cis isomers 2(c) and 1(c,c) in toluene,
respectively. It is evident that the peak positions of the
cis isomers are similar to that of the trans isomers. So,
it is perceivable that at the photostationary state the
absorption of the trans isomer dominates, and the spectra
of the trans rich and cis rich states differ only in the
absorption intensity.
(iv) Photochemical Isomerization. The absorption
spectral changes that occur for 2(t) and 1(t,t) on pho-
toisomerization are as shown in Figures 6a,b and 7a,b.
Both compounds behave in a similar manner. Upon
irradiation with 366 nm light, there is a gradual decrease
in the intensity of absorption of both the π-π* bands,
and upon irradiation with 436 nm light, the absorption
intensity is recovered back (52% for 2(t) and 95% for 1-
(t,t)). The photostationary state composition was deter-
mined using NMR analysis. Compound 2(t) upon 366 nm
irradiation isomerizes to 2(c), yielding a photostationary
state composition of 26% of 2(t) and 73% of 2(c) within
2 min. Compound 1(t,t) isomerizes to 1(t,c), which
further isomerizes to 1(c,c), and a photostationary state
composition of 67% of 1(t,t) and 32% of 1(c,c) was
reached within 7 min. The recovery of 2(t) from 2(c) by
436 nm irradiation is much lower than that of 1(t,t) from
1(c,c), probably because of (i) a higher quantum yield of
the forward isomerization and (ii) a higher molar extinc-
tion coefficient of 2(t). By alternating the irradiation
wavelengths between 366 and 436 nm, we verified that
the photochemical trans-cis and cis-trans processes
could be repeated between the 366 and 436 nm photo-
stationary states for more than 16 cycles (Figures 6d and
7d).
FIGURE 8. Comparison of the rate constants of the different
transitions for 1 and 2.
state was estimated. The extinction coefficient of 2(c) was
estimated to be 5000 M-1 cm-1 (326 nm) and 3600 M-1
cm-1 (395 nm), and that for 1(c,c) was 3800 M-1 cm-1
(365 nm) and 7200 M-1 cm-1 (320 nm). As the intermedi-
ate 1(t,c) was short-lived, an accurate calculation of its
concentration and hence its molar extinction coefficient
was not feasible. Assuming that azobenzene units absorb
independently in 1(t,c), we calculated the ꢀ of 1(t,c) as
an average value of the molar extinction coefficients of
1(t,t) and 1(c,c); hence, ꢀ of 1(t,c) at 365 nm was 9400
M-1 cm-1 and at 320 nm was 18 000 M-1 cm-1. Making
use of these values of molar extinction coefficients and
the initial portion of the A320 and time plots, the quantum
yields were evaluated. For the cyclic azobenzene dimer,
Φtt-tc was evaluated to be 0.01, whereas for its precursor,
Φt-c was found to be 0.16. The lower value of the
quantum yield for the cyclic azobenzene dimer may be
due to (i) the lack of an apparent energy minimum for
the different transition state geometries between 1(t,t)
and 1(t,c) and (ii) probably the isomerization is through
a transition state having close resemblance to 1(t,t)
geometry.
(v) Thermal Isomerization. The thermal cis-trans
isomerization of the transition 2(c) to 2(t) was deter-
mined by monitoring the increase of absorbance at λmax
in the absorption spectra. The first-order rate constant
(k) of the reaction was found to be 1.3 × 10-5 s-1 at 303
K. Compound 1(c,c) isomerizes in a stepwise manner,
initially to 1(t,c), which further isomerizes to 1(t,t). The
transition from 1(c,c) to 1(t,c) is very slow and proceeds
with a first-order rate constant k ) 5.01 × 10-9 s-1 at
303 K, which was monitored by the temporal increase in
concentration of 1(t,t) with temperature by NMR analy-
sis. Compound 1(t,c) isomerizes very quickly to 1(t,t)
with a first-order rate constant k ) 8.53 × 10-3 s-1 at
303 K, which was independently determined by following
the increase of absorbance at λmax within 5 min just after
366 nm irradiation using a photodiode array detector.
The first-order rate plots of these transitions at different
temperatures (Figure 8) were used to calculate the
thermodynamic parameters of the back relaxation pro-
cess, namely, the activation energy (Ea), Arrhenius
parameter (A), activation enthalpy (∆Hq), the activation
entropy (∆Sq), and the Gibbs free energy of activation
(∆Gq). The values obtained for the different parameters
are tabulated (Table 2).
The photoisomerization quantum yields can be calcu-
lated by the temporal absorption spectra if the absorption
coefficients of the reacting molecules are known. As
described earlier with help of 1H NMR spectral data, the
composition of the isomers at the 366 nm photostationary
(15) (a) Norikane, Y.; Kitamoto, K.; Tamaoki, N. J. Org. Chem. 2003,
68, 8291-8304. (b) Tamaoki, N.; Koseki, K.; Yamaoka, T. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Eng. 1990, 29, 105-106. (c) Tamaoki, N.; Ogata, K.;
Koseki, K.; Yamaoka, T. Tetrahedron 1990, 46, 5931-5942. (d)
Tamaoki, N.; Yamaoka, T. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin. Trans. 1991, 873-
878. (e) Tamaoki, N.; Yoshimura, S.; Yamaoka, T. Thin Solid Films
1992, 221, 132-139. (f) Rau, H.; Rottger, D. Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst.
1994, 246, 143-146. (g) Tauer, E.; Machinek, R. Liebigs Ann. 1996,
1213-1216. (h) Luboch, E.; Wagner-Wysiecka, V. C.; Kravtsov; Kessler,
V. Pol. J. Chem. 2003, 77, 189-196.
(16) Gore, P. H.; Wheeler, O. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1961, 26, 3295-
3298.
(17) Morris, R. J.; Brode, W. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1948, 70, 2485-
2488.
The thermodynamic parameters for the transition to
2(t) are comparable to that of cis-trans isomerization
9310 J. Org. Chem., Vol. 70, No. 23, 2005