Choi et al.
0.71073 Å) radiation, operating at 50 kV and 30 mA and a
CCD detector; 45 frames of two-dimensional diffraction images
were collected and processed to obtain the cell parameters and
orientation matrix. All data collections were performed at
223 K. The data collection 2θ ranges are 3.24-56.88° for 1,
3.06-49.42 for 2, respectively. No significant decay was
observed during the data collection. The raw data were
processed to give structure factors using the SAINT program.
Each structure was solved by direction methods and refined
by full matrix least squares against F2 for all data using
SHELXTL software (version 5.10).30 All non-hydrogen atoms
in compounds 1 and 2 were anisotropically refined. All other
hydrogen atoms were included in the calculated positions and
were refined by using a riding model. The crystal system in
compound 1 is triclinic and has a P1h space group. The
compounds 2 cocrystallize with methanol, and crystal system
is the triclinic space groups and P1h. There are one and a half
solvent (methanol) molecules disordered in the asymmetric
unit. The disordered solvent molecules were modeled success-
fully and their contribution was also included in the structure
factor. One of oxygen atom in methanol was heavily disordered.
Therefore, the oxygen atom was divided into two parts, O50
and O50′, with an occupancy of 0.20(2) and 0.30(2), respec-
tively. However, hydrogen atoms in methanol were not in-
cluded in the calculated positions.
Determination of Quantum Yields. The quantum yield
of the photochromic ring-cyclization of 1 was determined from
the absorption changes at λmax in UV spectra upon excitation
with UV light for the ring-closure reaction and visible light
for the ring- opening reaction. The molar extinction coefficients
of 1 and 2 are 4.6 ×104 M-1 cm-1 and 4.1 × 104 M-1 cm-1 at
365 nm, respectively. The quantum yield of the photochromic
ring-cyclization of 3 was determined from the 1H NMR signal
changes of methyl resonance peak at δ 2.05. Conversion and
the number of absorbed photons were determined at a given
radiation power and absorbance of the sample. Then, quantum
yield was determined according to the method described in ref
31.
Electric Characteristics. A photocell was fabricated by
spin coating of the solution of polystyrene (90 wt %) and
compound 1 or 3 (10 wt %) and 3 (100 wt %) onto a precleaned
ITO electrode coated glass and then dried at 70 °C for 24 h.
The thickness of the polymer film was determined by an R-step
(R-step Model-500) and was about 200 nm. Au strip (purity
>99.9%, Aldrich) was vacuum deposited to a thickness of
40 nm onto the polymer film, using a mask to form devices of
Au/polymer/ITO with an active area of 0.02 cm2 per device.
During the film formation and device fabrication, the color of
the film was maintained. The current-voltage (I-V) charac-
teristics were measured on a photocell at the room tempera-
ture. Each device was analyzed at least five times. The relative
error of the analysis was about 5%. The I-V characteristics
of the device were measured in colored state by UV excitation
and then under photostationary conditions (irradiating the
device with 532 nm laser for 2 h) to convert the diarylethene
unit in an open form. The potential change from 0 to 2 V and
2 to 0 V was repeated for at least 10 cycles but there was no
detectable decomposition during the cycles.
characteristics were measured on a photocell containing
a 1 and 3 dispersed polymer layer. Figure 4 shows the
applied voltage dependence of the current for the
photocells containing 1 and 3 polymer layer. The cell
fabricated from closed form of 1 showed a sharp current
increase by the potential rise. The current at 2 V was
3.6 times larger than that of the cell prepared from the
open isomer 1 (bleached cell). The current increase by
the potential rise was also observed for the open isomer
1, but the slope of I against V of the cell fabricated from
the open form of 1 was much smaller than that of the
closed form. It demonstrates that the extension of
π-conjugation between the thienyl rings and the ethene
unit in the closed form leads higher current response in
the potential than in the open form where such π-con-
jugation is limited. In the photocell containing 3, the
current increases 2 times larger than that of the open
form at 2 V. It may be attributable to the geometrical
characteristics due to the enforced configuration of the
dithienylethene moieties in the polymeric form, where
dithienylethene moieties are chemically bound. The
electric-current characteristics depends on the carrier
conductivity (σ) of the layer, and the slope of I-V curve
relates to resistance (1/σ). Compounds with phenylquino-
line groups show high electrical transport characteris-
tics;15 thus, the diarylethenes with such groups are also
regarded as having electrical conductivity. Importantly,
having a photochromic diarylethenes unit, the electrical
properties can be modulated by UV and visible light,
which can increase and decrease, respectively, the elec-
trical conductivity. Indeed the electrical conductivity,
estimated typically from the slope of a linear region in
an I-V plot, is much enhanced in the closed form and
reduced in the open form, as shown in Figure 4. The
electrical modulation was possible by optically by using
UV and visible light sources. The I-V plot for the pure
film of 3 is shown in Figure 4C, indicating large increase
in conductivity when it is excited by UV light.
In summary, we have synthesized a series of photo-
chromic compounds incorporating bis(phenylquinoline)-
unit and investigated the photophysical and electric
transport properties. Compounds 1 and 3 show a high
quantum yield due to the enforced antiparallel conforma-
tion of the dithienylethene moieties. Good transport
characteristics were observed in the colored form of the
diarylethenes with phenylquinoline group.
Experimental Section
All reactions were carried out under an argon atmosphere.
1,2-Bis(2-methyl-3-thienyl)perfluorocyclopentene,2 3,3-diben-
zoylbenzidine,28 and 1,2-bis(5-acetyl-2-methyl-3-thienyl)per-
fluorocyclopentene15 were synthesized using a modified pro-
cedure from previous references. For general experimental
details and instrumentation, see our previous publication.29
X-ray Crystallography. Suitable crystals of 1 and 2 were
obtained from the recrystallization in the presence or absence
of UV light in MeOH/THF. The crystals of 1 and 2 were
attached to glass fibers and mounted on a diffractometer
equipped with a graphite-monochromated Mo KR (λ )
1,2-Bis[5-(4-phenylquinolinyl)-2-methyl-3-thienyl]per-
fluorocyclopentene (1). A mixture of 1,2-bis(5,5’-diacetyl-
2-methyl-3-thienyl)perfluorocyclopentene (1 g, 2.21 mmol),
2-aminobenzophenone (0.959 g, 4.86 mmol), and diphenyl
phosphate (11 g) in toluene (10 mL) was purged with argon
for 20 min. The mixture was refluxed at 120 °C overnight. The
mixture was precipitated into 10% triethylamine/ethanol. The
product was purified on silica gel column (eluent 1:1 CH2Cl2/
1
hexane) to give 1 in 70% yield: mp 204 °C; H NMR (CDCl3)
δ 8.12 (d, J ) 8.10 Hz, 2H), 7.85 (d, J ) 8.10 Hz, 2H), 7.73 (s,
(28) Pelter, M. W.; Stille, J. K. Macromolecules 1990, 23, 2418.
(29) (a) Kim, S.; Kim, J. S.; Kim, S. K.; Suh, I.-H.; Kang, S. O.; Ko,
J. Inorg. Chem. 2005, 44, 1846. (b) Lee, T.; Jung, I.; Song, K. H.; Lee,
H.; Choi, J.; Lee, K.; Lee, B. J.; Pak, J. Y.; Lee, C.; Kang, S. O.; Ko, J.
Organometallics 2004, 23, 5280.
(30) SHELXTL NT Crystal Structure Analysis Package, Version
5.14; Bruker AXS, Analytical X-ray System, Madison, WI, 1999.
(31) Mejiritski, A., Polykarpov, A. Y., Sarker, A. M., Neckkers, D.
C., J. Photochem. Photobiol. 1997, 108, 289.
8296 J. Org. Chem., Vol. 70, No. 21, 2005