3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ye et al. Sci China Chem
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Table 1 Optimization of reaction conditions in DCM
Optimization of the reaction conditions in DCE
b)
Yield (%) b)
Yield (%)
a)
a)
Entry
T (°C)
Time (h)
Entry
n
3a
63
52
70
74
82
83
2a
16
10
10
6
3a
37
54
55
58
60
62
60
30
62
2a
5
1
2
3
r.t.
70
70
70
70
70
4
2
4
4
4
8
1
2
3
4
5
6
1.1
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
5.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
10
11
11
13
13
11
/
c)
4
5 d)
6 d)
5
5
c)
a) Tf2O (1.1 equiv.), 2-F-Pyr. (1.2 equiv.), 1a (1.0 equiv., 0.1 M), −40 °C,
5 min; 0 °C, 10 min; then 4a (3.0 equiv.) was added, the reaction was run at
the reported temperature; b) yields determined by 1H NMR using 1,3,5-
trimethoxybenzene as an internal standard; c) the concentration of 1a was
0.25 M; d) 4a (3.0 equiv., 1.5 M in DCE) was added dropwise.
7
8 d)
e)
9
10
a) Tf2O (1.1 equiv.), 2-F-Pyr. (1.2 equiv.), 1a (1.0 equiv.) −78 °C,
30 min; 4a was added and run at room temperature for 4 h; b) yields
determined by 1H NMR using 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene as an internal
standard; c) exposured to Tf2O at −40 °C; d) exposured to Tf2O at 0 °C; e)
after addition of 4a, the reaction was run at 40 °C.
reaction: only moderate yield was obtained. The coupling of
N-(3-methoxyphenyl)benzamide (1h) with phenylacetylene
afforded a mixture of two regioisomers 3h-a and 3h-b in a
combined yield of 65%. The reaction of N-naphthyl benza-
mide 1i produced the desired product 3i in only 38% yield
and alkyne imine 2i was not detected. The reactions of
electron-rich heteroaryl carboxamides 1j and 1k gave cor-
responding quinolines 3j and 3k in 65% and 74% yield,
respectively. Surprisingly, in both cases, alkyne imines 2j
and 2k were not observed. In addition to aromatic amides,
aliphatic amides such as 1l, 1m and 1n are also suitable
substrates, which reacted with phenylacetylene 4a to afford
the corresponding quinolines 3l, 3m and 3n in 73%, 64%,
and 64% yield, respectively. In addition, The structures of
both quinoline 3m and α-alkynyl imine 2b were determined
by single crystal X-ray diffraction analysis (Figure 1) [9].
Next, scope of alkyne was surveyed (Table 4). Arylacety-
lenes bearing a methoxy group at either para- or ortho-
position of the aryl ring afforded the desired quinolines 3o
and 3p in excellent yields. The alkyne bearing a meta-sub-
stituted methoxyl group (4q) also reacted smoothly to give
3q in 74% yield. A similar yield (3r, 70%) was obtained
from the reaction of (p-tolyl)acetylene (4r). The reaction of
electron-rich heteroaryl acetylene 4t also afforded a good
yield (84%). To our good surprise, in the absence of an
additional base, electron-deficient p-nitrophenylacetylene
(4s) also reacted with benzanilide to give the corresponding
quinoline 3s, albeit in only 46% yield. While aliphatic
alkynes bearing a cyclopropyl group and an alkenyl group
(4u and 4v) served well as reaction partners, low yields were
obtained from the reactions of simple 1-octyne (4w) and that
bearing an electron-withdrawing group (Cl) at α-position
from −78 to −40 °C without affecting yield (entry 7).
However, further elevating the temperature to 0 °C resulted
in a drop of yield (entry 8). On the other hand, elevating
reaction temperature at the second stage of the reaction (after
addition of 4a) seemed to be beneficial for the reaction (entry
9).
In the light of the latter result, DCE was employed as a
solvent to replace dichloromethane (Table 2). When the re-
action with 4a was run at 70 °C for 4 h, yield of 3a increased
to 70% (entry 1), which was further improved to 74% by
running the reaction at a concentration of 0.25 M (entry 4).
Moreover, mode of addition of 4a has an impact on the
reaction: by dropwise addition of a solution of 4a in DCE
(1.5 M), yield of 3a was further improved to 82% (entry 5).
In addition, prolonging reaction time to 8 h was unrewarding
(entry 6). Thus the optimal conditions for condensation re-
action of secondary amides and alkynes were determined as
treating 1a (1.0 equiv., 0.25 M) and 2-F-Pyr. (1.2 equiv.) with
Tf2O (1.1 equiv.) in DCE at −40 °C (5 min; 0 °C, 10 min),
following by addition of 4a (3.0 equiv., 1.5 M in DCE), and
stirred at 70 °C for 4 h.
After optimizing reaction conditions, the substrate scope
was investigated and the results are summarized in Table 3.
The reaction tolerated both electron-donating (Table 3, 1b
and 1c) and electron-withdrawing groups (1d) at the benzoyl
moiety. However, moderate yield was obtained from ben-
zamides bearing a strong electron-donating (1c) or a strong
electron-withdrawing group (1d). Substituents at para-po-
sition of the N-aryl moiety (1e–1g) are detrimental for the