460
L. XUE-TING ET AL.
hydrochloric acid, and then to about 9 with NaOH. After fil- (0.079 g, 0.40 mmol) was added. Two hours later, the residue
tration, the resulting solution was concentrated in vacuo. The was filtered off. The resulting light green solution was concen-
residue was extracted with water and CH2Cl2. The CH2Cl2 trated in vacuo and left undisturbed at room temperature for
layers were collected and dried overnight with Na2SO4. After two weeks, yielding light green crystals suitable for X-ray
filtration, the resulting solution was concentrated in vacuo to diffraction analysis. Yield: 0.120 g, 41.8%. Anal. Calc. for
give light yellow oily residue. Upon adding hydrochloric C32H37Cl2N5NiO6: C, 53.6; H, 5.2; N, 9.8%. Found: C, 53.9;
acid, a white solid precipitated, which was collected, washed H, 5.0; N, 9.6%. I.R. (KBr Disc, cm21): 3441(m), 3284(m),
with cold ethanol and dried. Yield: 10.1 g, 60.7%. Anal. Calc. 2927(m), 2360(w), 1611(m), 1584(w), 1512(s), 1445(m),
for: C20H32N3O2Cl3, C, 53.0; H, 7.1; N, 9.3%. Found: C, 52.7; 1426(s), 1336(w), 1304(w), 1247(s), 1208(w), 1177(m),
H, 7.1; N, 9.6%. I.R. (KBr Disc, cm21): 2935(s), 2725(br, s), 1140(w), 1099(s), 1026(s), 996(w), 958(s), 919(w), 878(w),
2556(m), 2426(s), 1615(s), 1585(m), 1518(vs), 1451(m), 840(s), 813(m), 754(w), 725(m), 622(s), 522(w), 424(w).
1303(m), 1254(vs), 1185(m), 1033(s), 972(w), 818(s), 757(w),
561(w), 532(w). 1H NMR. (D2O): 4.25 (4H, s, Ar-CH2-),
Crystallographic Data Collection and Refinement
3.38–3.45 (8H, d, NH-(CH2)2-NH), 7.05–7.45(8H, m, Ar-H),
3.85 (6H, s, -OCH3).
of the Structure
Single crystal of 1 was mounted on a glass-fiber. All
measurements were made on a Rigaku RAXIS-IV image
Preparation of [Ni(L)phenCl]ClO4 (1)
.
To the methanol solution of L 3HCl (0.181 g, 0.40 mmol)
.
was added Ni(ClO4)2 6H2O (0.146(g), 0.40 mmol) with con-
plate area detector with graphite monochromated Mo-Ka radi-
ation. The data were collected at 18 8C and corrected for
Lorentz and polarization effects. The correction for secondary
extinction was applied. The structure was solved by direct
methods, and expanded using Fourier techniques. The non-
hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically. Hydrogen
atoms were included but not refined. The final cycle of full-
matrix least-squares refinement was based on observed reflec-
tions (I . 2.00s (I)) and variable parameters. All calculations
were performed using SHELX-97 software package (Sheldrick,
1997). Crystallographic data for 1 are listed in Table 1.
Selected bond lengths and angles for 1 are listed in Table 2.
tinuous stirring, followed by addition of aqueous solution of
NaOH (4 N, 0.30 ml). After refluxing for 1 hour, phen
TABLE 1
Crystallographic data for 1
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature
C32H37Cl2N5NiO6
717.28
291(2) K
˚
0.71073 A
Wavelength
Crystal system, space group monoclinic, P2 (1)/c
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
˚
Unit cell dimensions
a ¼ 8.9670(18) A, a ¼ 908
Spectroscopic Characterization of 1
˚
b ¼ 15.274(3) A,
The medium band in the IR spectrum at 3284 cm21 is
related to n(NH) of the ligand, and two strong bands at
1099 cm21 and 622 cm21 are characteristic of uncoordinated
ClO24 . Upon coordination, two obvious absorption bands for
free phen at 1421 cm21 and 853 cm21 are each shifted
b ¼ 92.22(3)8
˚
c ¼ 24.161(5) A, g ¼ 908
3
˚
Volume
3306.6(12) A
23
.
4, 1.441 Mg m
0.800 mm21
1496
Z, Calculated density
Absorption coefficient
F(000)
upfield and downfield, i.e., to 1426 cm21 and 840 cm21
,
Crystal size
u range for data collection
Index ranges
0.22 ꢀ 0.20 ꢀ 0.20 mm
1.588 to 24.008
0 ꢁ h ꢁ 10, 217 ꢁ k ꢁ 17,
227 ꢁ l ꢁ 27
TABLE 2
˚
Selected bond lengths (A) and bond angles (8) for 1
Reflections collected/unique 7680/4472 [R(int) ¼ 0.0972]
Completeness to 2u ¼ 24.00 88.6%
Ni(1)-N(4)
Ni(1)-N(1)
Ni(1)-N(3)
2.069(5) Ni(1)-N(2)
2.122(4) Ni(1)-N(5)
2.183(5) Ni(1)-Cl(1)
2.080(4)
2.135(5)
2.447(2)
97.4(2)
Max. and min. transmission
Refinement method
0.8564 and 0.8437
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
4472/0/428
N(4)-Ni(1)-N(2) 173.3(2)
N(2)-Ni(1)-N(1)
N(4)-Ni(1)-N(5)
N(4)-Ni(1)-N(1)
N(2)-Ni(1)-N(5)
Data/restraints/parameters
Goodness-of-fit on F2
78.5(2)
81.6(2)
93.9(2)
1.005
a
N(2)-Ni(1)-Cl(1) 91.7(1)
N(1)-Ni(1)-Cl(1) 169.0(1)
N(5)-Ni(1)-Cl(1) 85.1(2)
N(3)-Ni(1)-Cl(1) 86.0(1)
N(5)-Ni(1)-N(3) 161.0(2)
b
Final R indices [I . 2s (I)]
R indices (all data)
Extinction coefficient
R1 ¼ 0.0685, wR2 ¼ 0.1709 N(1)-Ni(1)-N(5) 100.5(2)
a
b
R1 ¼ 0.0967, wR2 ¼ 0.1844 N(4)-Ni(1)-N(3)
0.0037(7)
N(2)-Ni(1)-N(3) 103.1(2)
0.620 and 20.697 e.A
N(1)-Ni(1)-N(3) 91.2(2)
N(4)-Ni(1)-Cl(1) 92.8(2)
82.1(2)
23
˚
Largest diff. peak and hole
aR1 ¼ SjjFoj 2 jFcjj/SjFoj;bwR2 ¼ SjjFoj 2 jFcjjw1/2/SjFoj w1/2
.