472
Kratz et al.
Arch. Pharm. Chem. Life Sci. 2005, 338, 462−472
were cultured in a humidified atmosphere of 95% air and 5% car-
bon dioxide at 37°C. Media were routinely changed every 3 days.
For subculture or experiments, cells growing as monolayer cultures
were released from the tissue flasks by treatment with 0.05%
trypsine/EDTA, and viability was monitored using the cell analyzer
system Casy 1 from Schärfe Systems (Reutlingen, Germany). For
the experiments, cells were used during the logarithmic growth
phase.
Acknowledgments
We thank the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and the
Hopp Stiftung for their financial support.
References
[1] F. Kratz, R. Mueller-Driver, I. Hofmann, J. Drevs, C. Unger,
J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 1253Ϫ1256.
MTT assay
[2] F. Kratz, A. Warnecke, K. Scheuermann, C. Stockmar, J.
Schwab, J. Lazar, P. Druckes et al., J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45,
5523Ϫ5533.
The MTT [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazolyl-2)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium
bromide] assay was performed in analogy to a literature protocol
[21]. Briefly, approximately 5000 cells were plated in each well of a
96-well tissue culture plate. Medium supplemented with 10% FCS
was added and cells were allowed to adhere for 24 h. Subsequently,
cells were pre-incubated with various drug concentrations
(0.001Ϫ60 µM) for 72 h and then labeled by adding sterile-filtered
MTT (5 mg/mL PBS). Cultures were incubated at 37°C for 2 h.
Subsequently, the supernatant was removed and 100 µL DMSO ad-
ded to each well. After an incubation time of 10 min, the extinction
of the samples was quantified with an ELISA reader (Dynatech
Laboratories Inc., Sullyfield, UK) at a wavelength of 570 nm. Four
separate cultures were determined per concentration. Results are
shown as means standard deviation of three independent experi-
ments (n ϭ 3).
[3] A. M. Mansour, J. Drevs, N. Esser, F. M. Hamada, O. A. Bad-
ary, C. Unger, I. Fichtner et al., Cancer Res. 2003, 63,
4062Ϫ4066.
[4] A. Warnecke, I. Fichtner, D. Garmann, U. Jaehde, F. Kratz,
Bioconjugate Chem. 2004, 15, 1349Ϫ1359.
[5] A. Warnecke, F. Kratz, Bioconjugate Chem. 2003, 14, 377Ϫ387.
[6] D. Gmehling, M. Medinger, K. Mross, B. Haering, F. Kratz,
C. Unger, J. Drevs et al., Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 2005,
46, 3987.
[7] F. Kratz, J. Drevs, G. Bing, C. Stockmar, K. Scheuermann, P.
Lazar, C. Unger, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2001, 11,
2001Ϫ2006.
[8] S. R. Denmeade, A. Nagy, J. Gao, H. Lilja, A. V. Schally, J. T.
Isaacs, Cancer Res. 1998, 58, 2537Ϫ2540.
Xenograft experiments
[9] S. R. Khan, S. R. Denmeade, Prostate 2000, 45, 80Ϫ83.
[10] S. R. Denmeade, J. T. Isaacs, Cancer J. Sci. Am. 1998, 4,
15Ϫ21.
The antitumor efficacy of PSA4-Arg and Doxorubicin was investi-
gated in a PSA-negative model (PC 3) and in a PSA-positive xenog-
raft model (CWR22); male Ncr nude mice were used for the PC 3
model and male NOD/SCID mice for the CWR22 transplants.
NOD/SCID mice were necessary because of the insufficient growth
of CWR22 in nude mice. The mice were held in laminar flow shelves
under sterile and standardized environmental conditions (25 2°C
[11] G. S. Coombs, R. C. Bergstrom, J. L. Pellequer, S. I. Baker, M.
Navre, M. M. Smith, J. A. Tainer, E. L. Madison, D. R. Corey,
Chem. Biol. 1998, 5, 475Ϫ488.
[12] C. F. Yang, E. S. Porter, J. Boths, D. Kanyi, M. Hsieh, B. S.
Cooperman, J. Peptide Res. 1999, 54, 444Ϫ448.
room temperature, 50
10% relative humidity, 12-h light-dark
[13] T. E. Murdter, B. Sperker, K. T. Kivisto, M. McClellan, P.
Fritz, G. Friedel, A. Linder et al., Cancer Res. 1997, 57,
2440Ϫ2445.
rhythm). They received autoclaved food and bedding (ssniff, Soest,
Germany) and drinking water ad libitum.
PC 3 and CWR22 prostate carcinomas were xenografted subcutane-
ously as fragments according to a literature protocol [22]. Mice were
randomly distributed to the experimental groups. When the tumors
had reached a palpable size, treatment was initiated. Mice were
treated intravenously in a weekly schedule with 10 mM sodium
phosphate and 5% d-glucose (pH 6.4), PSA4-Arg or Doxorubicin
(2.0 mg/mL). PSA4-Arg was dissolved in a sterile isotonic buffer
containing 10 mM sodium phosphate and 5% d-glucose (pH 6.4)
at a concentration of 6.0 mg/mL; for doses and schedules see Figs.
8 and 9 and Tables 2 and 3. Four to eight mice were used per group
for the experiments.
[14] S. R. Denmeade, C. M. Jakobsen, S. Janssen, S. R. Khan, E.
S. Garrett , H. Lilja, S. B. Christensen, J. T. Isaacs, J. Natl.
Cancer Inst. 2003, 95, 990Ϫ1000.
[15] S. R. Denmeade, W. Lou, J. Lovgren, J. Malm, H. Lilja, J. T.
Isaacs, Cancer Res. 1997, 57, 4924Ϫ4930.
[16] D. DeFeo-Jones, S. F. Brady, D. M. Feng, B. K. Wong, T.
Bolyar, K. Haskell, D. M. Kiefer et al., Mol. Cancer Ther. 2002,
1, 451Ϫ459.
[17] D. DeFeo-Jones, V. M. Garsky, B. K. Wong, D. M. Feng, T.
Bolyar, K. Haskell, D. M. Kiefer et al., Nat. Med. 2000, 6,
1248Ϫ1252.
Tumor size was measured twice weekly with a calliper-like instru-
ment in two dimensions. Individual tumor volumes (V) were calcu-
lated by the formula V ϭ (length Ϯ [width]2)/2 and related to the
values on the first day of treatment (relative tumor volume, RTV).
At each measurement day, treated/control values (T/C) were calcu-
lated as percentage for each experimental group; the optimum (low-
est) values obtained within 4 wk after treatment were used for evalu-
ating the efficacy of the compounds, and optimum T/C-values are
presented in Tables 2 and 3. The body weight of mice was deter-
mined twice weekly and related to the body weight on the first day
of treatment (body weight change, BWC). Statistical analysis was
performed with the U-test (MannϪWhitney) with p < 0.05.
[18] V. Dubois, L. Dasnois, K. Lebtahi, F. Collot, N. Heylen, N.
Havaux, A. M. Fernandez et al., Cancer Res. 2002, 62,
2327Ϫ2331.
[19] P. M. Loadman, M. C. Bibby, J. A. Double, W. M. Al-Shakhaa,
R. Duncan, Clin. Cancer Res. 1999, 5, 3682Ϫ3688.
[20] F. Kratz, A. Warnecke, B. Schmid, D. Chung, M. Gitzel, Curr.
Med. Chem. Anti-Cancer Agents 2005, in press.
[21] S. P. Cole, Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 1986, 17, 259Ϫ263.
[22] M. A. Wainstein, F. He, D. Robinson, H. J. Kung, S. Schwartz,
J. M. Giaconia, N. L. Edgehouse et al., Cancer Res. 1994, 54,
6049Ϫ6052.
2005 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim