and did not appear to be improvable due to the lack of
solubility of pochonin D at low temperature. Epoxidation
of the previously reported EOM9-protected pochonin D (8,
Scheme 1) afforded a 1:1 ratio of diastereoisomers 9.
Scheme 2. Synthesis of Pochonin A
Scheme 1. From Bis-EOM Pochonin D to Pochonin A
Deprotection of the EOM group using sulfonic acid resin
(Novabiochem, 70-90 mesh, MP) in methanol led to epoxide
opening (10), as well as conjugate addition of methanol (11).
A screen of other protic acids such as acetic acid or
hexafluoro-2-propanol and Lewis acids such as Sc(OTf)3 did
not yield a suitable solution. We therefore turned our
attention toward a synthesis that would rely on silyl-protected
phenols (Figure 2). Thus, persilylation of benzoic acid 14
esterification with alcohol 15. The low yield obtained was
attributed to the lability of the ortho TBS group, although it
should be noted that these three steps were carried out
without purification of the intermediates and as such this
sequence was quite practical. Deprotonation of the benzylic
methylene followed by reaction with Weinreb amide 13
afforded metathesis precursor 16 in modest yield. Ring-
closing metathesis using second generation Grubbs catalyst11
under thermodynamic conditions12 afforded macrocyle 17
in good yield and excellent cis/trans ratio (<5% cis).
Epoxidation of the unconjugated olefin was optimal when
carried out with methyl(trifluoromethyl)-dioxirane generated
in situ.13 It afforded protected pochonin A in excellent yield
as an inseparable 3:1 diastereomeric mixture. It is interesting
to note that epoxidation with mCPBA or DMDO only
proceeded at room temperature and did not give any
diastereomeric excess. Attempts to further improve the
stereoselectivity of the epoxidation using epoxone14 were not
productive. Deprotection of the products obtained from the
epoxidation afforded a separable diastereomeric mixture and
confirmed that the major product was indeed the desired
pochonin A.15 Although the overall synthetic sequence was
short and could be carried out in only a few days, the poor
yield in the acylation reactions led us to consider alternative
protecting groups. Eventually, we decided to use SEM ethers
Figure 2. General retrosynthetic analysis.
(Scheme 2), followed by “acid-free” conversion of the silyl
ester to the acyl chloride10 yielded key intermediate 12 upon
(6) Moulin, E.; Zoete, V.; Barluenga, S.; Karplus, M.; Winssinger, N. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 6999.
(7) Neckers, L.; Neckers, K., Heat-shock protein 90 inhibitors as novel
cancer chemotherapeutics-an update. Exp. Opin. Emerg. Drugs 2005, 10,
137. Workman, P. Curr. Cancer Drug Targets 2003, 3, 297.
(8) For recent examples, see: Shen, G.; Blagg, B. S. Org. Lett. 2005, 7,
2157. Yu, X. M.; Shen, G.; Neckers, L.; Blake, H.; Holzbeierlein, J.; Cronk,
B.; Blagg, B. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127 (37), 12778. Cheung, K.-M.;
Matthews, T. P.; James, K.; Rowlands, M. G.; Boxall, K. J.; Sharp, S. Y.;
Maloney, A.; Roe, S. M.; Prodromou, C.; Pearl, L. H.; Aherne, G. W.;
McDonald, E.; Workman, P. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2005, 15, 3338.
Dymock, B. W. et al J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 4212. Llauger, L.; He, H.;
Kim, J.; Aguirre, J.; Rosen, N.; Peters, U.; Davies, P.; Chiosis, G., J. Med.
Chem. 2005, 48, 2892. Kreusch, A.; Han, S.; Brinker, A.; Zhou, V.; Choi,
H.-S.; He, Y.; Lesley, S. A.; Caldwell, J.; Gu, X.-J., Bioorg. Med. Chem.
Lett 2005, 15, 1475. Vilenchik, M.; Solit, D.; Basso, A.; Huezo, H.; Lucas,
B.; He, H.; Rosen, N.; Spampinato, C.; Modrich, P.; Chiosis, G. Chem.
Biol. 2004, 11 (6), 787.
(10) Wissner, A.; Grudzinskas, C. V. J. Org. Chem. 1978, 43, 3972.
(11) Scholl, M.; Ding, S.; Lee, C. W.; Grubbs, R. H. Org. Lett. 1999, 1,
953. Chatterjee, A. K.; Morgan, J. P.; Scholl, M.; Grubbs, R. H. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 3783.
(12) Lee, C. W.; Grubbs, R. H. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 2145.
(13) Yang, D.; Wong, M.-K.; Yip, Y.-C. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60 (12),
3887.
(14) Tu, Y.; Wang, Z.-X.; Shi, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 9806.
Wang, Z. X.; Tu, Y.; Frohn, M.; Shi, Y. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 2328.
(15) 1H NMR of pochinin A was kindly provided by Dr. Stadler (Bayer
Health Care, Wuppertal, Germany).
(9) EOM (ethoxymethyl) because of the easier availability for EOM-Cl
compared to MOM-Cl.
5638
Org. Lett., Vol. 7, No. 25, 2005