olefination and the protected hydroxyl group at C1 should
be suitable for the formation of the δ-lactone moiety. To
ensure an efficient access to the R-keto ester 3, the enantio-
selective generation of the two nonheteroatom-substituted
stereogenic carbon atoms C2 and C10 has to be addressed.
Recognizing the Claisen rearrangement retron in the R-keto
ester 3, the achiral allyl vinyl ether 4 was selected as the
pivotal synthon.
Scheme 1. Retrosynthesis of the Key Building Block 3
It is well-known that the thermal Claisen rearrangement
of acyclic allyl vinyl ethers can be highly diastereoselective
based on the concerted nature and chairlike geometry of the
corresponding transition state.5 However, considering the
achiral nature of the allyl vinyl ether 4, an external chiral
inductor is required to control the absolute configuration of
the rearrangement product.6 Therefore, our recently imple-
mented protocol for a catalytic asymmetric Claisen rear-
rangement (CAC) should be ideally suited to solve this
problem.7 However, it was uncertain whether the highly
substituted and functionalized allyl vinyl ether 4 would be
tolerated as a substrate for our Lewis acid based CAC
protocol. Finally, a strategy that addresses the often trouble-
some diastereoselective generation of an acyclic vinyl ether
double bond was required for the synthesis of (E,Z)-4. A
convergent approach utilizing the building blocks 5-7 was
envisioned to take that synthetic hurdle.
Scheme 2 illustrates the synthesis of the Z-configured
allylic alcohol 7.
The synthesis was initiated with a Pd0-catalyzed hy-
drostannation of 2-butyne-1,4-diol 8 to afford the vinylstan-
nane 9 in excellent yield.8 Protection of the sterically less
hindered hydroxy group9 followed by iododestannation and
protection of the remaining hydroxy group as a TMS ether
provided the vinyl iodide 10. Initial attempts to perform the
subsequent cross coupling reaction in the absence of the TMS
protecting group were unsuccessful. However, the B-alkyl
Suzuki-Miyaura coupling10 between the in situ generated
borane11 from allyl benzyl ether (11) and 9-BBN12 as well
as the vinyl iodide 10 afforded the fully protected allylic
alcohol 12 along with varying amounts of the monodepro-
tected allylic alcohol 7. Complete cleavage of the TMS ether
was subsequently achieved by treatment of 12 with K2CO3
in methanol to afford the desired allylic alcohol 7 in 60%
overall yield for the cross coupling/deprotection sequence
as a single Z-configured diastereomer.
coupling constants and NOE studies. Although the absolute
configuration of xeniolide F (2) was not explicitly deter-
mined, the depicted absolute configuration at C2 and C10 is
consistent with earlier reports concerning the absolute
configuration of xenicane diterpenes from soft corals.3
Xenicanes combine unique structural features and interest-
ing biological activities with an unsolved supply issue.
However, synthetic efforts toward xenicane diterpenes are
rare.4 Therefore, we have initiated a research program aimed
at the total synthesis of members of the xenicane class of
diterpenes. Here, we report the efficient enantioselective
access to a key building block (3) in the projected total
synthesis of (-)-xeniolide F (2) and we provide a general
and enantioselective strategy for the generation of the critical
stereogenic carbon atoms C2 and C10 of the xenicane
framework.
Our retrosynthetic analysis rests on the availability of the
highly substituted acyclic R-keto ester 3 and requires the de
novo synthesis of the nine-membered carbocyclic segment
(Scheme 1). An intramolecular addition of a vinyl anion at
C7 to a carbonyl functionality at C6 may be envisioned for
this purpose. The R-keto ester function of building block 3
would be utilized to construct the C11/C12 double bond by
(5) (a) Ziegler, F. E. Chem. ReV. 1988, 88, 1423-1452. (b) Castro, A.
M. M. Chem. ReV. 2004, 104, 2939-3002.
(6) (a) Enders, D.; Knopp, M.; Schiffers, R. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
1996, 7, 1847-1882. (b) Ito, H.; Taguchi, T. Chem. Soc. ReV. 1999, 28,
43-50. (c) Nubbemeyer, U. Synthesis 2003, 961-1008.
(7) (a) Abraham, L.; Czerwonka, R.; Hiersemann, M. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 4700-4703. (b) Hiersemann, M.; Abraham, L. Eur. J.
Org. Chem. 2002, 1461-1471. (c) Abraham, L.; Ko¨rner, M.; Schwab, P.;
Hiersemann, M. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2004, 346, 1281-1294. (d) Abraham,
L.; Ko¨rner, M.; Hiersemann, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 3647-3650.
(8) Commeiras, L.; Santelli, M.; Parrain, J.-L. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 1713-
1715.
(3) (a) Vanderah, D. J.; Steudler, P. A.; Ciereszko, L. S.; Schmitz, F. J.;
Ekstrand, J. D.; Helm, D. V. d. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 5780-5784.
(b) Miyaoka, H.; Mitome, H.; Nakano, M.; Yamada, Y. Tetrahedron 2000,
56, 7737-7740. (b) Ohtani, I.; Kusumi, T.; Kashman, Y.; Kakisawa, H. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 4092-4096. (c) Ohtani, I.; Kusumi, T.; Ishitsuka,
M. O.; Kakisawa, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30, 3147-3150.
(4) For the total synthesis of (+)-coraxeniolide A, see: (a) Renneberg,
D.; Pfander, H.; Leumann, C. J. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 9069-9079. (b)
Liu, G.; Smith, T. C.; Pfander, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 4979-4982.
(9) Barrett, A. G. M.; Barta, T. E.; Flygare, J. A. J. Org. Chem. 1989,
54, 4246-4249.
(10) Miyaura, N.; Ishiyama, T.; Ishikawa, M.; Suzuki, A. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1986, 27, 6369-6372.
(11) Bo, Z.; Schlu¨ter, A. D. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 5327-5332.
(12) Brown, H. C.; Knights, E. F.; Scouten, C. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1974, 96, 7765-7770.
5706
Org. Lett., Vol. 7, No. 25, 2005