1100
G.G. Mohamed et al. / Spectrochimica Acta Part A 62 (2005) 1095–1101
Fig. 4. Structure of metal complexes (water of hydration is omitted).
The first estimated mass loss of 3.30% within the temperature
range 100–220 ◦C which might be attributed to liberation of
two hydrated water molecules (calculated mass loss 3.28%).
The ligand molecules were eliminated in the second and third
steps found within temperature range 220–670 ◦C with an
estimated mass loss sum to 72.28% (calculated mass loss
72.33%) which is responsibly accounted for liberation of
ligand molecule leaving UO2 residue within total estimated
mass loss 75.58% (total calculated mass loss 75.61%).
that the Ce(IV), Th(IV), UO2(II) complexes are hexacoordi-
nated and sulfasalazine ligand acted as bidentate ligand via
the deprotonated phenolic and carboxylic OH groups. The
extra coordination positions were provi−ded by the coordi-
nated water molecules and Cl− or NO3 anions. The pro-
posed structures are given in Fig. 4.
References
3.5. Kinetic studies
[1] D.B. Clyson, J.A.S. Pringle, G.M. Ranses, Biochem. Pharmacol. 16
(1967) 614.
The kinetic parameters such as activation energy (ꢁE*),
enthalpy (ꢁH*), entropy (ꢁS*) and free energy change of
the decomposition (ꢁG*) have been evaluated graphically
by employing the Coats–Redfern and Horwitz–Mitzger rela-
tions [22,23]. The calculated values of E*, A, ꢁS*, ꢁH* and
most significant result is the considerable thermal stability of
the complexes reflected from the high values of the activa-
tion energy of the decomposition. The second essential result
from Table 4 is that the entropy change ꢁS* for the forma-
tion of the activated complexes from the starting reactants is
in most cases of negative values. The negative sign of the ꢁS*
suggests that the degree of structural “complexity” (arrange-
ment, “organization”) of the activated complexes was lower
than that of the starting reactants and the decomposition reac-
tions are fast reactions [24].
[2] W.N. Beerlev, W. Pelers, K. Mager, Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 26
(1960) 288.
[3] G. Tarbini, Inst. Congr. Chemother. Proc. 5th 2 (1967) 909.
[4] Hoffman La Roches Co., Swiss Patent 416648 (1967).
[5] L.H. Schmidt, Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 23 (1969) 427.
[6] C. Sharaby, Synth. React. Inorg. Met. Org. Chem. 35 (2005) 133.
[7] A. Vaichulis, US Patent 3,272,352 (1966).
[8] M.M. Shoukry, E.M. Shoukry, Int. J. Chem. 2 (1991) 81.
[9] C. Sharaby, Spectrochim. Acta Part A, in press.
[10] J.B. Castledine, A.F. Fell, R. Modin, B. Sellberg, J. Chromatogr. 592
(1992) 27.
[11] W.M. Hosny, Synth. React. Inorg. Met.-Org. Chem. 29 (1999)
361.
[12] A.A. Soliman, G.G. Mohamed, W.M. Hosny, M.A. El-Mawgood,
Synth. React. Inorg. Met.-Org. Chem., in press.
[13] R. Sarin, K.N. Munshi, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 34 (1972) 581.
[14] (a) H. Irving, H.S. Rossitti, J. Chem. Soc. (1953) 3997;
(b) H. Irving, H.S. Rossitti, J. Chem. Soc. (1954) 2904.
[15] J.J. Filo, A. Terron, D. Mulet, V. Merno, Inorg. Chim. Acta 138
(1987) 197.
[16] (a) M.A. Zayed, F.A. Nour El-Dien, G.G. Mohamed, N.E.A. El-
Gamel, Spectrochim. Acta Part (A) 60 (2004) 2843;
(b) G.G. Mohamed, N.E.A. El-Gamel, Spectrochim. Acta Part (A)
60 (2004) 3141;
3.6. Structural interpretation
The structural information from elemental analysis, IR,
molar conductance and thermal analysis led to the conclusion
(c) G.G. Mohamed, N.E.A. El-Gamel, Vib. Spectrosc. 36 (2004) 97.