SHORT PAPER
Tandem Horner–Wadsworth–Emmons Olefination/Claisen Rearrangement/Hydrolysis
3195
hydrophobic acceleration effect,11 as well as effecting the
in situ hydrolysis of the intermediate a-ketoester.
CHa), 5.07 (m, 1 H, C6-CHb), 5.7 (m, 1 H, C5-CH), 7.25–7.4 (m, 5
H, Ph), 8.9 (br s, 1 H, OH).
13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): d = 35.8, 51.9, 117.7, 128.1, 129.0,
129.1, 134.4, 134.8, 160.3, 194.5.
Having established an effective tandem protocol on the
model system, we investigated the scope and limitations
of the method (Table 1). The results clearly show that the
method is particularly efficient for aryl aldehydes (entries
1–8). The reaction is compatible with both electron-donat-
ing (entries 2 and 3) and electron-withdrawing (entries 4–
6) functional groups on the aromatic core. The method is
also applicable to hindered aromatic substrates (entries 6
and 7) and to bifunctional aryl aldehydes (entry 8). Ali-
phatic aldehydes are also suitable substrates (entries 9–
12), even when highly enolisable (entry 9). The method is
highly selective for aldehydes as ketones (e.g. acetophe-
none, cyclobutanone, cyclopentanone) do not react under
these conditions. It should be noted that, in certain exam-
ples (e.g. entry 3), improved yields were obtained if the
olefination reaction was allowed to reach completion pri-
or to microwave irradiation.
+
HRMS–CI: m/z [M + NH4 ] calcd for C12H16NO3: 222.11302;
found: 222.11302.
Acknowledgment
We thank A. C. Whitwood for the assistance with X-ray crystallo-
graphy.
References
(1) Present address: Instituto de Quimica Medica CSIC, Juan de
la Cierva 3, 28006 Madrid, Spain. E-mail: EQ1@iqm.csic.es.
(2) (a) Raw, S. A.; Taylor, R. J. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126,
12260. (b) Oswald, M. F.; Raw, S. A.; Taylor, R. J. K. Org.
Lett. 2004, 6, 3997; and references cited therein. (c) Taylor,
R. J. K.; Reid, M.; Foot, J.; Raw, S. A. Acc. Chem. Res. in
press.
In conclusion, we have developed a technically simple
method for the synthesis of racemic 3-functionalised-2-
oxohex-5-enoic acids 1 in good to excellent yields
through a tandem three-step transformation involving
HWE olefination, Claisen rearrangement and hydrolysis
carried out in water under mild microwave-mediated con-
ditions. We are currently applying this methodology in
natural product synthesis.
(3) For recent reviews see: (a) Martín Castro, A. M. Chem. Rev.
2004, 104, 2939. (b) Ito, H.; Taguchi, T. Chem. Soc. Rev.
1999, 28, 43.
(4) (a) Kulkarni, M. G.; Pendharkar, D. S.; Rasne, R. M.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 1459. (b) For olefination thio-
Claisen rearrangement see: Corey, E. J.; Shulman, J. I. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1970, 92, 5522.
(5) (a) Schobert, R.; Gordon, G. J. Curr. Org. Chem. 2002, 6,
1181. (b) Loffler, J.; Schobert, R. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1 1996, 2799.
(6) Schobert, R.; Gordon, G. J.; Mullen, G.; Stehle, R.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 1121.
(7) Tanako, S.; Tomita, S.; Takahashi, M.; Ogasawara, K.
Synthesis 1987, 1116.
One-Pot Microwave-Assisted Reaction; General Procedure
To a microwave tube containing benzaldehyde (63 mL, 0.53 mmol)
and phosphonate 3 (150 mg, 0.53 mmol), was added a 10 M aque-
ous solution of K2CO3 (12 equiv). The heterogeneous mixture was
efficiently stirred and irradiated in a CEM focused microwave (Dis-
covery model) operating at 50 W at 105 °C for 10 min. The crude
material was diluted with water and extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 × 10
mL). The aqueous layer was acidified with 10% HCl solution (20
mL) and extracted with EtOAc (5 × 10 mL). The EtOAc layer was
washed with water and brine (15 mL), dried (MgSO4), the solvent
was removed under reduced pressure, affording 1a (115 mg, 88%
yield) as a waxy viscous solid; mp 64–65 °C.
(8) Ye, T.; McKervey, M. A. Chem. Rev. 1994, 94, 1091.
(9) Villieras, J.; Rambaud, M. Synthesis 1983, 300.
(10) Crystallographic data for 1a can be obtained on request from
The Director, Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre,
University Chemical Laboratory, Lensfield Road,
Cambridge CB2 1EW, UK. CCDC reference number:
255362. Selected crystallographic data: C12H12O3·C12H12O3
(dimer), M = 408.44, crystal system: Monoclinic, a = 16.103
(4), b = 5.4841 (12), c = 23.444 (5) Å, U = 2058.3 (8) Å3,
T = 115 (2) K, space group P2 (1)/c, Z = 8, m = 0.094 mm–1,
11027 reflections measured.
IR (film): 3430, 1725, 1519, 1258 cm–1.
1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): d = 2.59 (m, 1 H, C4-CHa), 2.85 (m,
1 H, C4-CHb), 4.68 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1 H, C3-CH), 5.02 (m, 1 H, C6-
(11) Gajewski, J. J. Acc. Chem. Res. 1997, 30, 219.
Synthesis 2005, No. 19, 3193–3195 © Thieme Stuttgart · New York