November 2005
1511
(25.1 mg, 68.9 mmol) were dissolved in THF–H2O (4 : 1, 0.5 ml). The reac-
tion mixture was stirred for 24 h, and then concentrated. The residue was pu-
rified with silica column chromatography (CHCl3 : CH3OHꢀ8 : 1) to afford 4
as a yellow compound (18.0 mg, 54%). 1H-NMR (CDCl3) 8.629 (1H, t,
Jꢀ5.6 Hz, NH), 8.177 (1H, d, Jꢀ7.9 Hz), 7.922 (1H, dd, Jꢀ7.9, 3.6 Hz),
7.814 (1H, dd, Jꢀ14.5, 1.6 Hz), 7.65—7.43 (m, 10H), 7.115 (1H, d,
Jꢀ7.9 Hz), 6.662 (1H, dd, Jꢀ7.9 Hz), 6.523 (1H, s), 4.075 (2H, d,
Jꢀ5.6 Hz), 3.793 (3H, s). FAB-MS m/z 594 (MꢂHꢂ) HR-FAB-MS Calcd
for C30H24F3N3O5P 594.1406, Found 594.1420.
Half Life of Compound 4 Assessed by UV Spectrophotometry
A
methanolic solution of compound 4 (0.5 mM) was irradiated with black light
at 1 cm at 0 °C. The spectrum was measured at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 5, 7.5 and
10 min. The broad peak at 360 nm decreased over time.
Irradiation of Compound 4 in Methanol-d3 (5) and 3-N-[2-Methoxy-4-
(3-trifluoromethyl-2-d3-methoxy-2-d-3-yl)benzyl]aminocarbonyl-4-
(diphenylphosphinyl)-benzoic Acid (6) Compound 2 (3.4 mg, 12.5 mmol)
was dissolved in CD3OD (2.5 ml). The solution was irradiated with black
light for 20 min. 1H-NMR (CD3OD) 7.322 (1H, d, Jꢀ7.9 Hz), 7.106 (1H, s),
7.052 (1H, d, Jꢀ8.0 Hz), 4.357 (2H, s), 3.881 (3H, s), IR (neat) 2100 cmꢁ1
.
Fig. 3. Chemiluminescence Detection of the Post-Functionalized PVDF
Membrane with Compound 7
The irradiated mixture was subjected to the Staudinger reaction with
triphenylphosphine derivative 3 (16.5 mg, 45.3 mmol) in THF–H2O (4 : 1,
0.5 ml). The product was purified with PLC (CHCl3 : CH3OHꢀ8 : 1ꢃ3 times
developments) and eluted with CHCl3 : CH3OHꢀ4 : 1 to afford a colorless
amorphous mass (2.9 mg, 39%), 1H-NMR (CDCl3) d: 8.652 (1H, t,
Jꢀ5.7 Hz), 8.237 (1H, d, Jꢀ8.0 Hz), 7.977 (1H, q, Jꢀ7.9, 3.6 Hz), 7.900
(1H, d, Jꢀ13.2 Hz), 7.716—7.490 (10H, m), 7.144 (1H, d, Jꢀ8.0 Hz), 6.895
(1H, s), 6.883 (1H, d, Jꢀ8.0 Hz), 4.101 (2H, d, Jꢀ5.7 Hz), 3.856 (3H, s). IR
(neat) 2100 cmꢁ1. FAB-MS m/z 602 (MꢂHꢂ), HR-FAB-MS Calcd for
C31H24D4F3NO6P 602.1853, Found 602.1837.
(A) Scheme of the post-functional modified PVDF membrane. (B) Chemilumines-
cence detection of blotted compound 7. Amounts blotted were, 35, 25, 15 and 7.5 pmol
for (I) to (IV), respectively.
1
and H-NMR confirmed the presence of a methylene vicinal
to the azide at 4.10 ppm. The results indicate that the azide
moiety remained after photolysis, as reported previously.23,24)
The Staudinger reaction with triphenylphosphine deriva-
Photoimmobilization of Compound 2 on PVDF Membrane PVDF
tive27) 3 with compound 2 afforded the desired ligated prod- membrane (10 cm square) was wetted with 0.5 mM of compound 2 in MeOH,
dried and irradiated by black light for 20 min on one side. After washing
uct 4 in a moderate yield. Compound 2 in methanol-d3 was
with MeOH, the membrane was dried completely. The biotinylated triph-
photoirradiated with black light to afford 5. The photolyzed
enylphosphine derivatives27) in PBS were blotted on the dried modified
membrane and heated to 50 °C for 8 h. The membrane was well washed with
mixture was subjected to the Staudinger–Bertozzi ligation
with compound 3 to afford ligated compound 6. The method
was then examined at the pmol scale, in which many pho-
toaffinity labeling experiments are usually performed. Com-
pound 2 was coated on the surface of a polyvinilidene difluo-
ride (PVDF) membrane followed by photoirradiation6) with
black light to introduce a crosslink (Fig. 3A). The membrane
was then subjected to the post biotinylation reaction with bi-
otinylated triphenylphosphine derivative 7 and the ligated bi-
otin was detected with a Streptavidin–horseradish peroxidase
(HRP) conjugate.5) The 15 pmol amount of reagent 7 was
still effective for visualization of cross-linked product on the
matrix (Fig. 3B).
MeOH, Tween-phosphate buffered saline (T-PBS) and treated with 10%-
skimmed milk/T-PBS for 1 h. After washing with T-PBS three times, the
membrane was immersed in 2000 times diluted Streptavidin–HRP with T-
PBS for 1 h, and then washed with T-PBS five times. The treated membrane
was subjected to chemiluminescence detection.
Acknowledgments The authors wish to thank Dr. Noriyuki Nakajima
(Toyama Prefectual University) for the MS spectral measurements. This re-
search was partially supported by a Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports,
Science and Technology Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on a Priority
Area, 17035006, and for the Encouragement of Young Scientists, 16710151
(M.H.), and also by Exploratory Research, 14658185, and CLUSTER (Co-
operative Link of Unique Science and Technology for Economy Revitaliza-
tion) (Y.H.).
The results show the potential utility of alkyl azide carry-
ing TPD derivatives in the application of photoaffinity bi-
otinylation, which could be useful for the ligands with tight
structural requirements.
References and Notes
1) Hatanaka Y., Nakayama H., Kanaoka Y., Rev. Heteroatom Chem., 14,
213—243 (1996).
2) Hatanaka Y., Sadakane Y., Curr. Top. Med. Chem., 2, 271—288
(2002).
Experimental
3) Gillingham A. K., Koumanov F., Hashimoto M., Holman G. D.,
“Membrane Transport: A Practical Approach,” ed. by Baldwin S. A.,
Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000, pp. 193—207.
4) Hatanaka Y., Hashimoto M., Kanaoka Y., Bioorg. Med. Chem., 2,
1367—1373 (1994).
5) Hatanaka Y., Hashimoto M., Nishihara S., Narimatsu H., Kanaoka Y.,
Carbohydr. Res., 294, 95—108 (1996).
6) Hatanaka Y., Hashimoto M., Kanaoka Y., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 120,
453—454 (1998).
7) Hashimoto M., Hatanaka Y., Chem. Pharm. Bull., 47, 667—671
(1999).
8) Hashimoto M., Hatanaka Y., Nabeta K., Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 10,
2481—2483 (2000).
9) Hashimoto M., Yang J., Holman G. D., ChemBioChem, 2, 52—59
(2001).
10) Hashimoto M., Okamoto S., Nabeta K., Hatanaka Y., Bioorg. Med.
Chem. Lett., 14, 2447—2450 (2004).
1
All H-NMR spectra were measured using JEOL JNM-FX270 and ECA-
500 spectrometers. MS spectra were obtained using JEOL JNM-LA400
spectrometers. IR spectra were obtained using JASCO FT-IR 420. All sol-
vents were of reagent grade and distilled using the appropriate methods.
3-(4-Azidomethyl-3-methoxy)-3-trifluoromethyl-3H-diazirine (2)
Compound 125) (0.1304 g, 0.422 mmol) and NaN3 (0.1478 g, 2.273 mmol)
were suspended in DMF (3 ml). The reaction mixture was stirred at room
temperature for 6 h and concentrated. The residue was partitioned between
ethyl acetate and water. The organic layer was washed with saturated NaCl,
dried over MgSO4, filtrated and concentrated. The residue was subjected to
silica column chromatography (ethyl acetate : hexaneꢀ1 : 14) to afford 2 as
a pale yellow oil (0.0752 g, 66%). 1H-NMR (CD3OD) d: 7.377 (1H, d,
Jꢀ7.4 Hz), 6.886 (1H, d, Jꢀ8.0 Hz), 6.762 (1H, s), 4.370 (2H, s), 3.875 (3H,
s). IR (neat) 2100 cmꢁ1. FAB-MS m/z 272 (MꢂHꢂ) HR-FAB-MS Calcd for
C10H9F3N5O 272.0738, Found 272.0759.
3-N-[2-Methoxy-4-(3-trifluoromethyl-3H-diazirin-3-yl)benzyl]-
aminocarbonyl-4-(diphenylphosphinyl)-benzoic Acid (4) Compound 2 11) Hatanaka Y., Kempin U., Park J.-J., J. Org. Chem., 65, 5639—5643
(15.3 mg, 56.4 mmol) and 1-methyl-2-diphenylphosphinoterephthalate 327)
(2000).