Watts et al.
TABLE 4. Diez Parameters rj and Ej for 13 and 14
4′S-FMAU (13) FMAU (14)
is preponderant for 13, whereas 14 is dominated by a conformer
remarkably close to the southeast (Figure 2).
The reasons for this dramatic conformational change are
complex. The steric effects between the thymine base and the
sugar ring would be reduced for a 4′-thionucleoside with its
longer C-S bonds, thus favoring a north conformation in which
the base is pseudoaxial. O-C-C-X gauche effects are typically
of greater magnitude than S-C-C-X gauche effects,23 and
accordingly, we would expect greater σC3′H3′ f σ*C4′O4′ and
σC2′H2′ f σ*C1′O4′ interactions relative to the σC3′H3′ f σ*C4′S4′
and σC2′H2′ f σ*C1′S4′ overlap. One predicts, therefore, that the
gauche effects would also provide a strong driving force for
the south (or east) conformation in the case of the oxygen
congener. However, a greater anomeric effect in the case of
the oxygen congener23,24 would favor the north conformation.
It follows then that the observed conformational preferences
are dominated by steric and gauche effects.
It is of interest to note that whereas 4′S-FMAU (13) adopts
predominantly the north conformation, the 2′-deoxynucleoside,
that is, 4′-thiothymidine (4′S-dT), adopts a south conformation
in the solid state and a predominantly south conformation in
solution.19 However, in the latter case, evidence was presented
for the representation of the north conformation in the confor-
mational ensemble.19 The shift from a predominantly south
conformation in 4′S-dT to the north conformation in 13 must
be caused by the greater F2′ steric effect in the south conforma-
tion that outweighs the stabilization gained by the F2′-S4′ and
O3′-S4′ gauche effects in 4′S-FMAU.
Rj
ꢀja
Rj
ꢀja
φ1
φ2
φ3
φ4
φ0
1.030
0.955
0.952
1.032
1.035
-3.615
-0.355
0.435
3.478
-0.057
0.998
1.012
1.016
0.995
0.981
1.621
0.252
-0.223
-1.415
-0.229
a In degrees.
TABLE 5. Final Results from PSEUROT Calculations (Including
1H-19F Coupling Constants) for 4′S-FMAU (13) and FMAU (14)
rms error
of the fit (Hz)
a
a
nucleoside
PI (φmaxI
)
P
II (φmaxII
)
ratio
13
-4 (44)
-6 (36)
-35 (39)
199 (43)
126 (36)
116 (53)
77:23
31:69
37:63
0.000
0.595
0.000
14b
14c
a In degrees. b With φmax of both conformers constrained at 36. c With
no constraints on the minimization.
deviation from equilateral geometry.19 These parameters were
therefore obtained for both systems studied by least-squares
minimization using the DFT-calculated structures mentioned
above and the program FOURDIEZ20 (Table 4).
A generalized Karplus equation has been developed for 1H-
19F couplings and proved to be useful for this work.21 However,
because the 1H-19F coupling constant is not as well character-
ized as the H-1H coupling constant, our initial PSEUROT
1
calculations were carried out using only the three 1H-1H
coupling values. To identify all possible solutions, 2400
consecutive calculations were carried out with different initial
values of the five pseudorotational parameters, optimizing three
of them at a time. The results were sorted by their rms error,
and the best several hundred solutions were examined carefully.
Multiple possible solutions emerged (Supporting Information,
Table S1).
Evidence for an accentuated steric effect in arabinofuranosyl
nucleosides in the south conformation may be inferred by the
significant population of the north conformation in 4′-thio-
arabinoadenosine (4′S-araA).25 We propose that this unfavorable
interaction is derived from syn-axial interactions between the
CH2OH moiety at C-4′ and the substituent at C-2′. We note
that base-modified 2′F-arabinonucleosides with north as well
as southeast conformations have been reported by Seela and
co-workers.26
To differentiate between these possible solutions and to refine
1
the structures, the H-19F coupling information was included.
Conclusions
Each of the possible regions from the initial calculations was
taken in turn as the starting point for the calculations. Inclusion
of the fluorine couplings led to one set of pseudorotational
parameters for 4′-thionucleoside 13 being easily identified (Table
5). For 4′-oxo nucleoside 14, the solution of best fit cor-
responded to a very unlikely arrangement, with the two
conformers showing drastically different φmax values and the
second conformer being too highly puckered for an oxacyclic
nucleoside.22 Therefore, the calculations were also carried out
constraining the φmax of both conformers to 36°, a likely value
according to the computed structures. The phase angles and mole
fractions obtained from these two sets of calculations were
similar; both results are listed in Table 5.
Conformational analysis of 2′-deoxy-2′-fluoro-5-methyl-4′-
thioarabinouridine (4′S-FMAU) showed that it adopted north
(-6°) and south (199°) conformations with a 77% preference
for the north. This is in sharp contrast to the southeast (∼120°)
conformer that dominates the conformational equilibrium of its
4′-oxygen congener (∼65%). Arguments are presented to
suggest that the replacement of oxygen by the cognate sulfur
atom at the 4′ position leads to a decrease in the magnitudes of
C5′-base steric effects and various gauche effects and a
corresponding shift to a north conformation.
Experimental Section
Parametrization of PSEUROT for 2′-Fluoroarabino Con-
figurations. Aj and Bj parameters for these two systems were
obtained using a method similar to that of Houseknecht et al.27 All
Regardless of which of the two solutions best describes
nucleoside 14, it is clear that, as predicted by the qualitative
examination of coupling constants, a northern pseudorotamer
(23) Pinto, B. M.; Leung, R. Y. N. In The Anomeric Effect and Associated
Stereoelectronic Effects; Thatcher, G. R. J., Ed.; American Chemical
Society: Washington, DC, 1993; Vol. 539, pp 126-155.
(19) Koole, L. H.; Plavec, J.; Liu, H. Y.; Vincent, B. R.; Dyson, M. R.;
Coe, P. L.; Walker, R. T.; Hardy, G. W.; Rahim, S. G.; Chattopadhyaya, J.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 9936-9943.
(20) FOURDIEZ is a part of the PSEUROT 6.3 suite of programs.
(21) Thibaudeau, C.; Plavec, J.; Chattopadhyaya, J. J. Org. Chem. 1998,
63, 4967-4984. Thibaudeau, C.; Chattopadhyaya, J. Ph.D Thesis, Uppsala
University, 1999.
(22) The DFT calculations undertaken for the parametrization of
PSEUROT confirmed that the replacement of O4′ by S causes the value of
φmax to increase by 10-15°.
(24) Wolfe, S.; Pinto, B. M.; Varma, V.; Leung, R. Y. N. Can. J. Chem.
1990, 68, 1051-1062. Schleyer, P. V.; Jemmis, E. D.; Spitznagel, G. W.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 6393-6394.
(25) Wirsching, J.; Voss, J.; Adiwidjaja, G.; Balzarini, J.; De Clercq, E.
D. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2001, 11, 1049-1051.
(26) He, J.; Mikhailopulo, I. A.; Seela, F. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 5519-
5524. He, J.; Eickmeier, H.; Seela, F. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. C 2003, 59,
o406-o408. Peng, X.; Seela, F. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2004, 2, 2838-2846.
924 J. Org. Chem., Vol. 71, No. 3, 2006