Volpe et al.
Scheme 1. Anionic Cycle of Proposed Mechanism for Ir/I-Catalyzed
Methanol Carbonylation
fused to a quartz cell, in a CaF2 IR cell sealed with serum caps, or
in the flow system described below. The sample concentration for
the measurement was typically 1-3 mM except for bulk photolysis
reactions where higher concentrations were used. The solutions were
deaerated by entrainment with argon or carbon monoxide with three
freeze-pump-thaw cycles then equilibrated under Ar or CO
(various PCO).
The time-resolved infrared spectrometer and its applications to
the reactions of metal carbonyl intermediates in migratory insertion
reactions have been described previously.7 In the current config-
uration, the IR probe is generated by a lead salt diode laser with a
single longitudinal mode selected by a CVI Digikrom Model 240
monochromator. The probe beam was overlapped at the plane of
the infrared cell with a 355 nm pump pulse from a Lumonics
HY600 Nd:YAG laser. The high-pressure/variable-temperature (HP/
VT) flow system assembled at UCSB7g allowed for the equilibration
of sample solutions for time-resolved infrared (TRIR) experiments
with various pressures of CO at the desired temperatures and
provided a steady flow of fresh sample solution to a CaF2 IR cell
for photolysis experiments.
Continuous photolysis experiments were conducted using stan-
dard procedures8 in a darkroom. The excitation source was a 200
W high-pressure mercury lamp mounted on an Oriel optical train
(UVP) with intensity regulation by an internal feedback loop. The
light from this source was first passed through an IR filter, followed
by neutral density filters to reduce intensity, and an interference
filter to isolate the mercury line at 366 nm. A lens was used to
focus the light onto the sample, and the solution was stirred
continuously. Ferrioxalate actinometry was used to evaluate light
intensities.8a,b The sample was irradiated for the specific period,
and the reaction progress was monitored by UV-visible and FTIR
spectroscopy. Quantum yields were determined by fitting plots of
incremental quantum yields, Φi (first 10-30% of the reaction), for
absorbance changes vs percent reaction with a linear equation.8c,d
The y intercept is the photoreaction quantum yield, Φ. Experiments
were carried out multiple times to ensure reproducibility.
Bulk photolysis reactions were carried out by using standard
gastight Schlenk flasks or gastight NMR tubes for experiments in
deuterated solvent. The apparatus used is an ACE Glass photo-
chemical safety UV cabinet model 7836-20 and a 200 W mercury
lamp immersed in a quartz well with flowing water for cooling
and for IR filtering.
CO migratory insertion to give an acyl intermediate are rate
limiting.4a,c In nonpolar media, this transformation is dra-
matically accelerated by added methanol and Lewis acids,
is strongly inhibited by iodide salts such as [Bu4N]I,4b and
is promoted by neutral ruthenium iodo carbonyls and main-
group iodides (e.g., InI3, GaI3, SnI2, and ZnI2).4e These
observations were interpreted in terms of 1a being activated
by iodide scavengers that promote transformation under CO
to the neutral fac-tricarbonyl complex [CH3Ir(CO)3I2], which
undergoes methyl migration and I- addition to form the acyl
complex ion fac-[Ir(C(O)CH3)(CO)2I3]- (2b). This reactivity
has been attributed to enhanced electrophilicity of the cis
carbonyl, owing to competition for metal d electrons from
the other COs.4d,e,5 Reductive elimination from 2b and
hydrolysis of the resulting acetyl iodide leads to acetic acid
formation.
The goal of the present study was to utilize photochemical
techniques to generate and time-resolved spectroscopy to
interrogate intermediates possibly relevant to methanol
carbonylation promoted by iridium salts. In the course of
this investigation, we have demonstrated that irradiation of
1a promotes an unprecedented photoinduced CO migratory
insertion to give the stable acetyl complex ion mer,trans-
[Ir(C(O)CH3)(CO)2I3]- (2a), which was isolated as the
AsPh4+ salt and structurally characterized. Here we describe
the characterization of various transient and stable species
formed under various conditions and discuss the possible
relevance of these with regard to catalytic pathways involving
iridium iodo carbonyl complexes.
(5) (a) Similar enhanced electrophilicity of coordinated CO was used to
interpret [CO] effects on the water gas shift catalytic activity of
rhodium halo carbonyl complexes in aqueous amine solutions.5b,c (b)
Lima Neto, B. S.; Ford, K. H.; Pardey, A. J.; Rinker, R. J.; Ford, P.
C. Inorg. Chem. 1991, 30, 3837-3842. (c) Ford, P. C.; Rockicki, A.
AdV. Organomet. Chem. 1988, 28, 139-217.
(6) Riddick, J. A.; Bunger, W. B.; Sakano, T. K. Organic SolVents Physical
Properties and Methods of Purification, 4th ed.; John Wiley and
Sons: New York, 1986; Vol. II.
(7) (a) Di Benedetto, J. A.; Ryba, D. W.; Ford, P. C. Inorg. Chem. 1989,
28, 3503-3507. (b) Boese, W. T.; Ford, P. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1995, 117, 8381-8391. (c) Massick, S.; Rabor, J.; Elbers, S.;
Marhenke, J.; Bernhard, S.; Schoonover, J.; Ford, P. C. Inorg. Chem.
2000, 39, 3098-3106. (d) Massick, S. M.; Mertens, V.; Jon Marhenke,
J.; Ford, P. C. Inorg. Chem., 2002, 41, 3553-3559. (e) Massick, S.
M.; Bu¨ttner, T.; Ford, P. C. Inorg. Chem. 2003, 42, 575-580. (f) Ford,
P. C.; Massick, S. M. Coord. Chem. ReV. 2002, 226, 39-46. (g)
Massick, S. M.; Ford, P. C. Organometallics 1999, 18, 4362-4366.
(8) (a) Calvert, J. G.; Pitts, J. N. Photochemistry; John Wiley and Sons:
New York, 1967; pp 783-786. (b) Malouf, G.; Ford, P. C. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 7213-7221. (c) Chaisson, D. A.; Hintze, R. E.;
Stuemer, D. H.; Petersen, J. D. Mcdonald, D. P.; Ford, P. C. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1972, 94, 6665-6673. (d) Works, C. F.; Jocher, C. J.;
Bart, G. D.; Bu, X.; Ford, P. C. Inorg. Chem. 2002, 41, 3728-3736.
(9) (a) Forster, D. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. Lett. 1969, 5, 433-436. (b) Forster,
D. Inorg. Chem,. 1972, 11, 473-475.
Experimental Section
Materials. Iridium trichloride hydrate, tetraphenylarsonium
chloride, and iodomethane were purchased from Aldrich and used
without further purification. The solvents used in these experiments
(1,2-dichoroethane (DCE), dichloromethane, acetonitrile, and tet-
rahydrofuran (THF)) were purified and dried following standard
distillation procedures.6 Deuterated acetonitrile and dichloromethane
were purchased from Cambridge Isotope Laboratories and used
without any further purification. Gases were obtained from Praxair.
Photolysis Procedures. The solutions studied by continuous and
laser flash photolysis techniques were contained in a gastight flask
1862 Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 45, No. 4, 2006