arrangement in columnar self-assemblies. Mesogens with
three differently substituted oligobenzoate arms have been
synthesized using a 2-fold benzyl-protected phloroglucinol.13
The second arm has been coupled by stoichiometric control
yielding only small amounts of target molecules. In a
different context, dendritic molecules based on aromatic ether
scaffolds with up to four arms have been synthesized;
however, arm components have been attached early in the
multistep synthesis, affording only low overall yields. Thus,
dendrons previously synthesized were lost during these
procedures.14 The drawbacks can be overcome with a strategy
using orthogonal protecting groups, prior to the coupling of
arm scaffolds. These protecting groups have to be introduced
and cleaved successively, without influencing each other or
the attached benzoate scaffold. An ABC moiety based on
phloroglucinol has been synthesized earlier;15 however, in
conditions where one of the applied protecting groups, i.e.,
the benzenesulfonyl group, deprotects, benzoate functions
cleave, too. Thus, for an efficient synthesis of nonsymmetric
star oligobenzoates, a new ABC phloroglucinol derivative
should be designed. Promising phenol protecting groups for
phloroglucinol are the benzyl and the tert-butyldimethylsilyl
group, which can be cleaved individually without effect upon
the benzoate units.16
direct 3-fold O-benzylation leads to a minimum of 10% of
an additional Friedel-Crafts C-benzylated product, which
can be removed only with difficulty and in small amounts
of material by chromatography.18 Recently, Kawamoto and
co-workers developed a synthetic route to a pure 3-fold
O-benzylated phloroglucinol, which can be applied for large-
scale production.19 Here, the electron-rich benzene ring of
phloroglucinol could be deactivated vs Friedel-Crafts reac-
tions by 3-fold O-acetylation. Subsequent ester cleavage in
the presence of benzyl chloride led to the analytically pure
1,3,5-trisbenzyloxybenzene as starting material for the
synthesis of 1.
The synthetic route toward ABC core 1, starting with
1,3,5-trisbenzyloxybenzene 2, is outlined in Scheme 1.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of ABC Building Block 1
To build up the target ABC core, 1 (Figure 1), as a key
compound for the preparation of star-shaped or dendritic
molecules with different arms or dendrons, either the
protecting groups have to be attached stepwise or a protecting
group has to be removed from a 3-fold protected phloro-
glucinol. The latter strategy turned out to be the most efficient
Selective monodebenzylation was first achieved by the
method of Curtis et al.17b A subsequent etherification with
tert-butyldimethylsilyl chloride afforded the silyl ether 4 in
excellent yields. In the following debenzylation step, basic
conditions have to be avoided to not cleave the just
introduced silyl ether function. Thus, cyclohexene is em-
ployed as a hydrogen donor,17c which permits the controlled
monodeprotection in good yields. If the reaction is stopped
at the appropriate time, the single second compound isolated
apart from the target molecule is the unreacted starting
material, which can be reused in the deprotection procedure.
Reaction times that are too long result in a mixture with the
additional 2-fold deprotected product.
Key compound 1 can be used to introduce three different
arms by subsequent selective esterification and deprotection
procedures (Scheme 2). The conditions are optimized for
benzoate scaffolds.5,20 Esterification of the phenolic hydroxy
group with 3,4,5-tridodecyloxybenzoic acid provides com-
pound 5 in excellent yields. The silyl ether function is cleaved
by tetra-n-butylammonium fluoride with a small amount of
acetic acid to not provoke a transesterification process by
Figure 1. New ABC building block; a phloroglucinol core with
2-fold orthogonal protected phenolic OH groups (Bn ) benzyl).
because selective coupling of one or two protecting groups
to phloroglucinol affords mixtures of compounds which are
difficult to separate. For 1,3,5-trisbenzyloxybenzene, various
selective monodeprotection procedures are known17 and thus
it has been chosen as starting material. However, it should
be noted that its synthesis is not straightforward because
(13) Lehmann, M.; Gearba, R. I.; Koch, M. J. H.; Ivanov, D. Mol. Cryst.
Liq. Cryst. 2004, 411, 397.
(14) (a) Peerlings, H. W. I.; Struijk, M. P.; Meijer, E. W. Chirality 1998,
10, 46. (b) Kremers, J. A.; Meijer, E. W. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 4262.
(15) Wolff, S.; Hoffmann, H. M. R. Synthesis 1988, 760.
(16) Green, T. W.; Wuts, P. G. M. Protecting Groups in Organic
Synthesis, 3rd ed.; Wiley: New York, 1999.
(18) Deme, E. J. Org. Chem. 1976, 41, 3769.
(17) (a) Chow, H.-F.; Wang, Z.-Y.; Lau, Y.-F. Tetrahedron 1998, 54,
13813. (b) Curtis, W. D.; Stoddart, J. F.; Jones, G. H. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
I, 1977, 7, 785. (c) Nithyanandhan, J.; Jayraman, N. J. Org. Chem. 2002,
67, 6282.
(19) Kawamoto, H.; Nakatsubo, F.; Murakami, K. Synth. Commun. 1996,
26, 531.
(20) Wang, Q. M.; Bruce, D. W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1997,
36, 150.
722
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 4, 2006