Z.-Z. Liu et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 16 (2006) 1282–1285
1285
J.; Guzman, C.; Jimeno, J.; Demetri, G. D. J. Clin. Oncol.
2004, 22, 1480; (d) Laverdiere, C.; Kolb, E. A.; Supko, J.
G.; Gorlick, R.; Meyers, P. A.; Maki, R. G.; Wexler, L.;
Demetri, G. D.; Healey, J. H.; Huvos, A. G.; Goorin, A.
M.; Bagatell, R.; Ruiz-Casado, A.; Guzman, C.; Jimeno,
J.; Harmon, D. Cancer 2003, 98, 832; (e) Aune, G. J.;
Furuta, T.; Pommier, Y. Anti-cancer Drugs 2002, 13, 545;
(f) Ryan, D. P.; Puchalski, T.; Supko, J. G.; Harmon, D.;
Maki, R.; Garcia-Carbonero, R.; Kuhlman, C.; Winkel-
man, J.; Merriam, P.; Quigley, T.; Jimeno, J.; Manola, J.;
Demetri, G. D. Oncologist 2002, 7, 531.
lines, respectively. As shown in Table 1, most of the
compounds showed considerable cytotoxicities to these
three cell lines, while the ester analogs (18–35) showed
stronger cytotoxicity than that of amide analogs (47–
56) in general. Although a general structure–activity
relationship of the simplified analogs of Et 743 to anti-
cancer effect could not be summarized from these data,
the following points were noteworthy: compound 25
had better inhibitory activity to HCT-8 cells, com-
pounds 18, 23, 25, 28, and 31 had stronger activities
against BGC-823 cells, compound 31 showed the most
significant activity.
3. Corey, E. J.; Gin, D. Y.; Kania, R. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1996, 118, 9202.
´
4. Cuevas, C.; Perez, M.; Martın, M. J.; Chicharro, J. L.;
Fernadez-Rivas, C.; Flores, M.; Francesch, A.; Gallego,
´
´
In conclusion, we have synthesized a class of simplified
analogs of Et 743. The preliminary structure–activity
relationship study indicated that the ester analogs had
stronger activity than that of the amide analogs, and
1-naphthalene carboxylate ester analog 31 showed the
most significant activity against BGC-823 tumor cells.
´
P.; Zarzuelo, M.; de la Calle, F.; Garcıa, J.; Polanco, C.;
Rodrıguez, I.; Manzanares, I. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 2545.
´
5. Endo, A.; Yanagisawa, A.; Abe, M.; Tohma, S.; Kan, T.;
Fukuyama, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 6552.
6. Martinez, E. J.; Owa, T.; Schreiber, S. L.; Corey, E. J.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1999, 96, 3496.
7. Tang, Y. F.; Liu, Z. Z.; Chen, S. Z. Tetrahedron Lett.
2003, 44, 7091.
8. Jeedigunta, S.; Krenisky, J. M.; Kerr, R. G. Tetrahedron
2000, 56, 3303.
Acknowledgments
9. Wang, Y.; Liu, Z. Z.; Chen, S. Z.; Liang, X. T. Chin.
Chem. Lett. 2004, 15, 505.
10. Mancuso, A. J.; Swern, D. Synthesis 1981, 165.
11. (a) Lane, J. W.; Chen, Y.; Williams, R. M. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2005, 27, 12684; (b) Magnus, P.; Mathews, K. S.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 12476.
We thank the National Natural Sciences Foundation of
China (No. 30472077) and Beijing Municipal Natural
Sciences Foundation (No. 7042041) for financial
support.
12. Mosman, T. J. Immunol. Methods 1983, 65, 55.
20
References and notes
13. Compound 30: mp: 111–113 °C, ½aꢁD +64.4 (c 0.59,
CHCl3); 1H NMR (300 MHz, d ppm, CDCl3): 7.53 (d,
1H, J = 4.2 Hz, C@CH), 7.52 (d, 1H, J = 4.8 Hz,
C@CH), 7.06 (t, 1H, J = 4.2, 4.8 Hz, C@CH), 6.61 (s,
2H, Ar-H), 6.44 (s, 1H, Ar-H), 6.43 (s, 1H, Ar-H), 4.28
(dd, 1H, J = 4.2, 10.8 Hz, 22-H), 4.17 (s, 1H, 21-H), 4.03
(t, 1H, J = 3.6 Hz, 1-H), 3.96 (dd, 1H, J = 4.8, 10.8 Hz,
22-H), 3.86 (s, 3H, CH3O), 3.85 (s, 3H, CH3O), 3.80 (s,
3H, CH3O), 3.77 (s, 3H, CH3O), 3.54 (s, 1H, 11-H), 3.38
(d, 1H, J = 7.8 Hz, 13-H), 3.32 (d, 1H, J = 11.7 Hz, 3-H),
3.04 (dd, 1H, J = 7.8, 17.7 Hz, 14-H), 2.55 (d, 2H, 4-
H + 14-H), 2.42 (d, 1H, J = 11.7 Hz, 4-H), 2.33 (s, 3H, –
NCH3). 13C NMR d (300 MHz, CDCl3, ppm): 161.54
(C@O), 148.00, 147.97, 147.61, 146.23, 133.40 (–CH–),
132.85, 132.34 (–CH–), 127.72 (–CH–), 127.47, 126.52,
124.46, 123.03, 118.17 (–CN), 112.14 (–CH–), 110.56
(–CH–), 110.28 (–CH–), 110.08 (–CH–), 68.50 (–CH2–),
62.90 (–CH–), 60.83 (–CH–), 60.78 (–CH–), 56.59 (–CH–),
56.03 (–CH3), 55.88 (–CH3), 55.87 (–CH3), 55.64
(–CH–), 55.56 (–CH3), 41.69 (–CH3), 32.83 (–CH2–),
25.73 (–CH2–). FABMS (m/z): 576 (M+1), 549 (MꢀCN),
434, 244, 204 (100%), 190, 111.
1. (a) Rinehart, K. L.; Holt, T. G.; Fregeau, N. L.; Keifer, P.
A.; Wilson, G. R.; Perun, T. J.; Sakai, R.; Thompson, A.
G.; Stroh, J. G.; Shield, L. S.; Seigler, D. S. J. Nat. Prod.
1990, 53, 771; (b) Rinehart, K. L.; Holt, T. G.; Fregeau,
N. L.; Stroh, J. G.; Keifer, P. A.; Sun, F.; Li, L. H.;
Martin, D. G. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 4512; (c) Wright, A.
E.; Forleo, D. A.; Gunawardana, G. P.; Gunasekera, S.
P.; Koehn, F. E.; McConnell, O. J. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55,
4508; (d) Guan, Y.; Sakai, R.; Rinehart, K. L.; Wang, A.
H.-J. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 1993, 10, 793.
2. For clinical data, see: (a) Ryan, D. P.; Supko, J. G.; Eder,
J. P.; Seiden, M. V.; Demetri, G.; Lynch, T. J.; Fischman,
A. J.; Davis, J.; Jimeno, J.; Clark, J. W. Clin. Cancer Res.
2001, 7, 231; (b) van Kesteren, Ch.; de Vooght, M. M.;
Lopez-Lazaro, L.; Mathot, R. A.; Schellens, J. H.; Jimeno,
J. M.; Beijnen, J. H. Anti-cancer Drugs 2003, 14, 487; (c)
Garcia-Carbonero, R.; Supko, J. G.; Manola, J.; Seiden,
M. V.; Harmon, D.; Ryan, D. P.; Quigley, M. T.;
Merriam, P.; Canniff, J.; Goss, G.; Matulonis, U.; Maki,
R. G.; Lopez, T.; Puchalski, T. A.; Sancho, M. A.; Gomez,