Reactivity of Palladium(0) Complexes
Organometallics, Vol. 17, No. 14, 1998 2959
Ta ble 1. 31P NMR Ch em ica l Sh iftsa of th e
P a lla d iu m (0) Com p lex Gen er a ted in Situ in
Mixtu r es of P d (d ba )2 a n d 2TF P
(n g 2) in DMF a n d THF a s In vestiga ted by 31P
NMR Sp ectr oscop y. In DMF, a set of 2 broad signals
δ1 and δ2 of equal magnitude were observed in the 31P
NMR spectrum of a mixture of Pd(dba)2 + 2TFP while
the signal δ0 of the free ligand was not detected (Table
1), eq 6. As already established for PPh3,2,8 the presence
Pd(0)(dba)(TFP)2
solvent
TFP δ0
δ1
δ2
PhPdI(TFP)2 δ3
DMF
THF
-76.19
-75.24
-36.26
-36.54
-33.71
-33.84
-28.36
-27.83
Pd(0)(dba)2 + 2TFP f Pd(0)(dba)(TFP)2 + dba (6)
31P NMR chemical shifts of the complex PhPdI(TFP)2 resulting
from the oxidative addition with PhI. In ppm vs H3PO4 as an
external reference.
a
of two different phosphorus atoms is due to a monoli-
gation of the ligand dba in the complex Pd(dba)(TFP)2.
However, the signals were too broad (∆ν1/2 ) 85 Hz) to
allow determination of the coupling constant J PP. In
to express the concentration of SPd(0)L2 comparatively
to that of SPd(0)L3 and Pd(0)(dba)L2. Depending on the
basic properties of the phosphines, evolution of the
concentration and of the intrinsic reactivity of SPdL2
(k in eq 5) could be antagonist, leading to nonlinear
correlation of the reactivity with the basicity of the
phosphine, as established for para-substituted tri-
phenylphosphines.5
Catalytic reactions involve successive elemental steps
(oxidative addition, ligand exchange, reductive elimina-
tion, etc.) whose respective rates depend on the nature
of the ligand with, as a consequence, a possible inversion
of the rate-determining step. In palladium(0)-catalyzed
reactions involving aryl halides, it is generally admitted
that the first step of the catalytic cycle is oxidative
addition of a palladium(0) complex with the aryl halide.
It is, therefore, of interest to compare the reactivity of
the oxidative addition of the palladium(0) complexes
generated in situ in mixtures of Pd(dba)2 with phos-
phines ligands as a function of the ligand. In 1988, a
new ligand tri-2-furylphosphine (TFP) was tested by
the presence of 10 equiv of phenyl iodide, a new signal
at δ3 appeared instead of δ1 and δ2 (Table 1). This signal
characterizes the trans complex PhPdI(TPF)2 formed in
the oxidative addition (eq 7).9
Pd(0)(dba)(TFP)2 + PhI f PhPdI(TPF)2 + dba (7)
In the mixtures of Pd(dba)2 + nTFP (n > 4), the two
signals at δ1 and δ2 disappeared and a broad signal was
detected at δ4 (e.g., n ) 8, δ4 ) -64.46 ppm, ∆ν1/2
)
6
Farina6a in reactions catalyzed by mixtures of Pd(dba)2
202 Hz). Despite the excess of ligand, the signal of the
free phosphine at δ0 was never observed. This means
that addition of more than 2 equiv of TFP to Pd(dba)2
affords a palladium(0) complex involved in an equilib-
rium with the ligand (eqs 8 and 9). In the presence of
7
or Pd2(dba)3 and phosphine ligands. More efficient
catalytic systems were very often observed when switch-
ing from triphenylphosphine to tri-2-furylphosphine.6,7
We wish, therefore, to report our investigation on the
comparative reactivity of {Pd(dba)2 + nTFP} with that
of {Pd(dba)2 + nPPh3}2 in oxidative addition with
phenyl iodide. In DMF, {Pd(dba)2 + nTFP} is always
more reactive than {Pd(dba)2 + nPPh3} whatever n (n
g 2). In THF, {Pd(dba)2 + nTFP} is more reactive than
{Pd(dba)2 + nPPh3} when n > 6 whereas it is less
reactive when n < 6. This may have important conse-
quences on the kinetics of the overall catalytic reaction.
Pd(0)(dba)(TFP)2 + TFP U
TFP
SPd(0)(TFP)3 + dba
K0
(8)
(9)
TFP
SPd(0)(TPF)3 U SPd(0)(TPF)2 + TFP
K2
phenyl iodide, the signals δ3 of PhPdI(TFP)2 and δ0 of
the free ligand were detected. We noticed that in
mixtures of Pd(dba)2 + 4TFP, the two signals of Pd-
(dba)(TFP)2 were no longer observed, but surprisingly,
no other signals could be detected in the 31P NMR
spectrum. However, after addition of 10 equiv of PhI
into the NMR tube, the signals δ3 of PhPdI(TFP)2 and
δ0 of free TFP were observed, suggesting that the signal
of the palladium(0) formed from Pd(dba)2 + 4TFP was
so broad that it could not be detected.
Resu lts a n d Discu ssion
Id en tifica tion of th e P a lla d iu m (0) Com p lexes
F or m ed in Situ in a Mixtu r e of P d (d ba )2 + n TF P
(7) For the use of Pd2(dba)3 + nTPF, see: (a) Farina, V.; Hauck, S.
I. Synlett 1991, 3, 157. (b) Farina, V.; Krishnan, B. J . Am. Chem. Soc.
1991, 113, 9585. (c) Farina, V.; Firestone, R. A. Tetrahedron 1993, 49,
803. (d) Farina, V.; Krishna, B.; Marshall, D. R.; Roth, G. P. J . Org.
Chem. 1993, 58, 5434. (e) Siesel, D. A.; Staley, S. W. Tetrahedron Lett.
1993, 34, 3679. (f) Siesel, D. A.; Staley, S. W. J . Org. Chem. 1993, 58,
7870. (g) Badone, D.; Cardamone, R.; Guzzi, U. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994,
35, 5477. (h) Busacca, C. A.; Swestock, J .; J ohnson, R. E.; Bailey, T.
R.; Musza, L.; Rodger, C. A. J . Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 7553. (i) Yang,
Y.; Wong, H. N. C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 50, 9583. (j) Casson, S.;
Kocienski, P.; Reid, G.; Smith, N.; Street, J . M.; Webster, M. Synthesis
1994, 1301. (k) Wagner, R. W.; J ohnson, T. E.; Li, F.; Lindsey, J . S. J .
Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 5266. (l) Caldirola, P.; Chowdury, R.; J ohansson,
A. M.; Hacksell, U. Organometallics 1995, 14, 3897. (m) Koo, S.;
Liebeskind, L. S. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 3389. (n) Goux, C.;
Massacret, M.; Lhoste, P.; Sinou, D. Organometallics 1995, 14, 4585.
(o) Bao, Z.; Chan, W. K.; Yu, L. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 12426.
(p) Attwood, M. R.; Raynham, T. M.; Smyth, D. G.; Stephenson, G. R.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 2731. (q) Wolfe, J . P.; Rennels, R. A.;
Buchwald, S. L. Tetrahedron 1996, 52, 7525. (r) Fournier-Nguefack,
C.; Lhoste, P.; Sinou, D. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 4353.
The same investigation was undertaken in THF
(Table 1) but will not be discussed here since the 31P
NMR spectra were very similar to those reported by
Farina for mixtures of Pd2(dba)3 and 4TFP.7b
(8) Herrmann, W. A.; Thiel, W. R.; Brossmer, C.; O¨ fele, K.; Prier-
meier, T.; Scherer, W. J . Organomet. Chem. 1993, 461, 51.
(9) (a) The complex PhPdI(TPF)2 was also slowly formed by addition
of 2 equiv of TFP to a solution of PhPdI(PPh3)2 according to the
reaction: PhPdI(PPh3)2 + 2TFP f PhPdI(TPF)2 + 2PPh3 (eq I). (b)
Substitution of TFP by PPh3 in PhPdI(TPF)2 to form PhPdI(PPh3)2 is
faster than in eq I,9a suggesting that PPh3 is a better ligand than TPF
for palladium(II), i.e., PPh3 is more basic than TFP.7b