Presumably, the trimethylsilyl thioester generated from
addition of the thiolate to the mixed anhydride rearranges
to the trimethylsilyl thionoester under the reaction conditions.
Upon methanolysis, the thio acid is liberated. Subsequent
exposure to the azide leads to the amide according to the
mechanism outlined in Scheme 1.
trimethylsilyl thiolate formation step of entry 5, and the
overall yields were equally effective within experimental
error.
The ability to employ unprotected coupling partners, such
as 4-carboxy bezenesulfonazide (14a), enables direct sub-
sequent functionalization without having to implement a
protecting group strategy. For example, Fmoc-Ile-OH, was
converted to 15a (Table 1) and taken directly and im-
mobilized on the amine-functionalized Wang amide resin.
The same overall sequence, leading to an identically func-
tionalized resin, was achieved by formation of the N-acyl
sulfonamide on solid support (Scheme 4). Thus, Wang amide
This approach has many favorable qualities, including
reactant stoichiometry (near 1:1 for all reagents), volatility
of most reagents and reaction byproducts, reliably high
yields, and that the choice of solvent in the coupling reaction
can be determined by the solubility properties of the reactants
since the thio acid/azide amidation is effective in a range of
organic and aqueous solvents.1,16 Moreover, N-acyl sulfona-
mides often display significant water solubility. Avoidance
of aqueous workup and the lack of significant byproducts
and excess reagents, commonly used for other sulfonamide
couplings, also adds to the attractiveness of the method. In
generating the thio acid, the less convenient use of hydrogen
sulfide, sodium sulfide,15c-f or the less atom economical use
of thiols, such TMOB-thiol7 and related hydrogen sulfide
equivalents,15g,h is avoided by using bis(trimethylsilyl) sulfide.
The generation of trimethylsilyl thiolate from bis(trimeth-
ylsilyl) sulfide with methyllithium conveniently leads to
excellent overall yields of amide.15a Solutions of tetrabutyl-
ammonium fluoride in THF dried over activated molecular
sieves performed as well as methyllithium and gave yields
that were superior to those obtained with wet tetrabutylam-
monium fluoride;15b however, methyllithium reactions are
easier to monitor and are not contaminated by nonvolatile
tetrabutylammonium salts. In addition to the favorable qual-
ities mentioned above, this method is highly complementary
to other N-acyl sulfonamide syntheses. Direct amidation of
sulfonamides with active esters usually requires strong base
and/or highly active esters and excess reagents.3,17 The con-
ditions presented here are mildly basic and compatible with
a range of functionality, including acid- and base-sensitive
protecting groups as well as certain unprotected functionality.
Scheme 4
resin was coupled with commercial 14a18 and then exposed
to the crude Fmoc-Ile-SH (17) prepared according to our
method. The consumption of resin-bound azide was readily
monitored,19 and the only modification to the amidation
protocol was the use of excess 17 (2 equiv based on the
parent carboxylic acid) and methylene chloride instead of
methanol.20 Proof that we had indeed succeeded in effecting
thio acid/azide amidation on solid support was secured by
comparison of the spectral characteristics of the purified
cleavage products from the two resins, which were shown
to be identical. The overall isolated yield of the 18 was 72%
based on the loading capacity of the resin.
In Table 1, entries 4 and 5 employed trimethylsilylethyl
sulfonazide (SES-N3). We wondered if N-acyl sulfonamides
derived from the Weinreb SES group would offer the
opportunity of mild sulfonamide N-S bond cleavage (Scheme
5).21 Removal of the SES protecting group from an amine
usually requires high temperature and excess fluoride
reagent.22 These conditions are readily attributable to the poor
leaving group ability of the anionic amine. An N-acyl
sulfonamide represents a substrate with comparatively su-
For the entries in Table 1, the same procedure was
followed, modified only by the reaction time allowed for
the consumption of mixed anhydride by thiolate, a parameter
readily monitored by TLC. Coupling partners include base-
sensitive substrates (entries 1-3), acid-sensitive substrates
(entries 3-5), protected alcohol (entry 4), free alcohol (entry
5), and free carboxylic acid (14a, entries 1-3). Methyllithium
and dried tetrabutylammonium fluoride were used for the
(14) Caution: Bis(trimethylsilyl) sulfide hydrolyzes to hydrogen sulfide,
which is highly toxic. Although we have noted no problems with compounds
described in this report, azides may be explosive.
(15) For other methods to generate thio acids, see: (a) Kraus, G. A.;
Andersh, B. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 2189. (b) Schwabacher, A. W.;
Maynard, T. L. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34, 1269 and references therein.
(c) Yamashiro, D.; Blake, J. Int. J. Peptide Protein Res. 1981, 18, 383 and
references therein. (d) Pansare, S. V.; Vederas, J. C. J. Org. Chem. 1989,
54, 2311. (e) Hoeg-Jensen, T.; Holm, A.; Sorensen, H. Synthesis 1996, 383.
(f) Lee, A. H. F.; Chan, A. S. C.; Li, T. Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 833. (g)
Goldstein, A. S. Gleb, M. H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 2797. (h) Gartner,
H.; Villain, M.; Botti, P.; Canne, L. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 2239.
(16) DMSO is an exception. We believe this is due to oxidation of the
thio acid. Selenocarboxylates appear to behave similarly. See: Wu, X.; Hu,
L.; Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 8401.
(18) Carboxybenzene sulfonazide was attached to amine functionalized
Wang amide resin. The reaction was monitored until completion as
determined by the Kaiser test: Kaiser, E.; Colescott, R. L.; Bossinger, C.
D.; Cook, P. I. Anal. Biochem. 1970, 34, 595. See Supporting Information.
(19) Punna, S.; Finn, M. G. Synlett 2004, 99.
(20) The thio acid/azide amidation is compatible with a wide range of
solvents (see also, ref 16).
(21) For other examples of mild N-acyl sulfonamide cleavage, see: (a)
Kan, T.; Fukuyama, T. Chem. Commun. 2004, 353. (b) Fukuyama, T.;
Cheung, M.; Jow, C.; Hidai, Y.; Kan, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 5931.
(c) Ahmed, N.; Tsang, W. Y.; Page, M. I. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 595 and
references therein.
(22) Weinreb, S. M.; Demko, D. M.; Lessen, T. A., Demers, J. P.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1986, 27, 2099.
(17) Wieland, T.; Hennig, H. J. Chem. Ber. 1960, 93, 1236. For
alternatives applicable to solid support synthesis, see refs 2, 3d, and 3e.
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 5, 2006
825