C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Table 2. Enantioselective Alkylation with Alkyl Chlorides
Table 1. Catalyst Optimization
entry
ligand
temp (
°
C)
time
% eea
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
(R,R)-Me-BPE
(R)-Me-PHOX
(R)-Ph-PHOX
23
23
23
23
23
-30
-30
-30
-30
20 min
1 h
1 h
1 h
1 h
48 h
60 h
60 h
60 h
-21 (-19b)
-24
10
(S)-Bn-PHOX
7
(R)-i-Pr-PHOX (10)
(R,R)-Me-BPE
(R)-Me-PHOX
(R)-i-Pr-PHOX (10)
(S)-i-Pr-PHOX
27 (8c)
19
11
-79d
75
a Measured by chiral HPLC. Negative ee denotes opposite enantiomer.
b With 2 mol % catalyst loading. c Reaction with benzyl bromide. d The %
ee reported as an average of four trials.
phosphido complex (D to A in Scheme 1), and (2) its noncompeti-
tive background reaction.
Having demonstrated proof of principle (eq 3), the catalytic
alkylation of 3 with benzyl chloride was examined with a variety of
chiral hydrido ruthenium complexes (Table 1). The substituted phos-
phine was isolated as the air-stable benzylmethylphenylphosphine
borane 9. Ruthenium catalysts with C2-symmetric diphosphine
ligands overall gave low enantioselectivities.10 Notably, reducing the
catalyst loading from 10 to 2 mol % resulted in only a slight de-
crease in the enantiomeric excess, demonstrating the efficiency of
the metal-catalyzed reaction (entry 1). Phosphino-oxazoline (PHOX)
ligands also resulted in low enantioselectivities (entries 2-5).
Reaction with the more reactive benzyl bromide gave a significant
decrease in the enantioselectivity (entry 5). Upon lowering the
reaction temperatures to -30 °C, however, the i-Pr-PHOX catalyst
10 afforded phosphine borane 9 in 79% ee (entry 8).
The temperature-optimized conditions with catalyst 10 were then
applied to the asymmetric alkylation of secondary phosphine 3 with
a variety of substituted benzylic chlorides (Table 2). The reaction
tolerates para-substitution, particularly electron-donating groups
(entries 3 and 4). Chloro substitution was also tolerated in the
reaction (entry 2). Substrates with substitution in the ortho position
reacted efficiently, although with lower enantioselectivities (entries
5-7). Chelating bisphosphines were efficiently synthesized (entries
7 and 8); a chiral pincer ligand (entry 8) was obtained from the
double substitution in 95% ee. Heteroaryl substrates were tolerated
(entries 9-11), giving a chiral pyridyl-pincer ligand in 84% ee
(entry 9). The reaction was demonstrated to take place efficiently
with a nonbenzylic electrophile to give ethylmethylphenylphosphine
borane in 57% ee (entry 12).
a Isolated yields. b Measured by chiral HPLC. c The % ee after a single
recrystallization. d A 33:67 mixture of C2:meso diastereomers determined
by HPLC. e A 74:26 C2:meso dr. f A 58:42 C2:meso dr. g Reaction with
ethyl bromide.
Supporting Information Available: XRD for 1 and 2-BPh4,
experimental procedures, and characterization data are available. This
References
(1) Nielsen, L. P. C.; Stevenson, C. P.; Blackmond, D. G.; Jacobsen, E. N. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 1360-1362.
(2) (a) Buhro, W. E.; Zwick, B. D.; Georgiou, S.; Hutchinson, J. P.; Gladysz,
J. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 2427-2439. (b) Crisp, G. T.; Salem,
G.; Wild, S. B. Organometallics 1989, 8, 2360-2367. (c) Bohle, D. S.;
Clark, G. R.; Rickard, C. E. F.; Roper, W. R. J. Organomet. Chem. 1990,
393, 243-285.
(3) For a recent review, see: Cre´py, K. V. L.; Imamoto, T. Top. Curr. Chem.
2003, 229, 1-40.
(4) For recent asymmetric syntheses, see: (a) Kovacik, I.; Wicht, D. K.;
Grewal, N. S.; Glueck, D. S.; Incarvito, C. D.; Guzei, I. A.; Rheingold,
A. L. Organometallics 2000, 19, 950-953. (b) Moncarz, J. R.; Laritcheva,
N. F.; Glueck, D. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 13356-13357.
(5) Fox, D. J.; Bergman, R. G. Organometallics 2004, 23, 1656-1670.
(6) Kaplan, A. W.; Ritter, J. C. M.; Bergman, R. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998,
120, 6828-6829.
In conclusion, the enhanced nucleophilicity of electron-rich
ruthenium phosphido complexes was exploited in the development
of a catalytic system for the asymmetric synthesis of P-stereogenic
phosphines. This enantioselective alkylation reaction provides access
to useful and synthetically challenging phosphine ligands in a single
step from secondary phosphines and alkyl halides. In a broader
sense, this reaction represents the activation of a nucleophile via
coordination to an electron-rich transition metal; this reactivity,
which differs from typical Lewis acid activation of an electrophile,
offers many new exciting avenues in catalysis.11
(7) An alternative method of preparing 1 from (dmpe)2RuH2 is described in
the Supporting Information.
(8) The full scope of electrophiles that react with 1 will be reported in due
course.
(9) Metal phosphido complexes typically exhibit low barriers to pyramidal
inversion: Rogers, J. R.; Wagner, T. P. S.; Marynick, D. S. Inorg. Chem.
1994, 33, 3104-3110. We are currently investigating the barrier to
pyramidal inversion in 7.
(10) Other diphosphine ligands afforded 9 with low or no enantiomeric
excess: (R,R)-DIOP (0%); (R,R)-i-Pr-DuPhos (0%); (R,R)-Me-DuPhos
(-10%); (R,R)-Et-DuPhos (-9%).
(11) By agreement of the authors, this paper should have appeared simulta-
neously on the ASAP version of the journal with the paper by Scriban
and Glueck that immediately follows this one in the paginated version of
the journal (Scriban, C.; Glueck, D. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128,
2788-2789.
Acknowledgment. The authors wish to thank Dr. Jennifer
Krumper for helpful discussions. We are grateful to Prof. David
Glueck for disclosure of results prior to publication and for agreeing
to simultaneous publication of our closely related studies. We
acknowledge financial support from NSF Grant CHE-0345488 to
R.G.B., from an NSF predoctoral fellowship to I.C.S., and from
DuPont and Merck Research Laboratories to F.D.T.
JA058100Y
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 128, NO. 9, 2006 2787